One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study.

One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33599092

about

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial).Prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse.Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol)Uterine-preserving POP surgery.Pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function.Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse.Functional Outcomes for Incontinence and Prolapse Surgery.The Design of a Randomized Trial of Vaginal Surgery for Uterovaginal Prolapse: Vaginal Hysterectomy With Native Tissue Vault Suspension Versus Mesh Hysteropexy Suspension (The Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial)Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: abdominal and vaginal approaches.Hysteropexy compared to hysterectomy for uterine prolapse surgery: does durability differ?Where to for pelvic organ prolapse treatment after the FDA pronouncements? A systematic review of the recent literature.Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation.Management of pelvic organ prolapse and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Manchester-Fothergill and the Elevate Posterior technique for the correction of a cervical elongation and large enterocele in a patient with bladder exstrophy and multiple surgeries.Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation versus hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with Prolift™ mesh.Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion.The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.Native Tissue Repairs for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.The effects of prolapse surgery on vaginal wall sensibility, vaginal vasocongestion, and sexual function: a prospective single centre study.Long-term functional outcomes following mesh-augmented posterior vaginal prolapse repair.Long-term outcome of native tissue reconstructive vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse at 86 months: Hysterectomy versus hysteropexy.Combined sacrospinous hysteropexy and cystopexy using a single anterior incision.Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse and uterine descent in the Netherlands.Surgical options for apical prolapse repair.Sacrospinous ligament fixation for hysteropexy: does concomitant anterior and posterior fixation improve surgical outcome?Safety and one year outcomes following vaginally assisted laparoscopic uterine sacropexy (VALUES) for advanced uterine prolapse.Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: a randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh.A comparison of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as treatment for uterine descent.Prediction of time to return to work after gynaecological surgery: a prospective cohort study in the Netherlands.Evaluation of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy vs. Uterosacral Suspension for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Assessment.Predictors of persistent detrusor overactivity in women with pelvic organ prolapse following transvaginal mesh repair.The Manchester repair: an instructional video.

P2860

Q24197762-A3AC4264-B0DA-416C-8E4A-169C52F45269 Q33821406-359717AE-56C4-4F91-9B17-AA693156EF2E Q34201944-3C48C322-10F1-4A27-B05A-29E7D0D3E20C Q34624579-441303B7-C5CD-47D2-8F77-8030A573E341 Q35021383-6C299109-625F-457D-AC33-B258D24BC3A0 Q35021401-5669EC02-1339-48B8-8FB0-A2D54EF60CB4 Q35881662-7568590F-E425-4E77-A7B2-DEDBC3A10507 Q35980919-1FAFA5F3-5A21-4593-A099-C20B1AB63323 Q36310610-E37A9856-F294-4680-8BAD-59C3D728A771 Q37033826-6CBF94B0-CADB-4029-9963-575A1A362987 Q37948631-EF0CE55F-2E1C-44A8-BACD-94D3A0D8128D Q37981896-F96CBA5B-5283-4889-949B-7A70505B6654 Q38073115-FE12A1E5-90DA-4104-A3C4-4423481E3D97 Q38108746-9D9284F1-2F81-49AF-A93D-5A3C45E121A5 Q38115704-83C95D1F-7BDD-451F-91D3-05326A7A02B4 Q38314383-A3AEB400-C0EA-4366-9E72-0019E53F1135 Q38323656-DEE8B994-6948-4940-9E19-F4C7E8480D95 Q38638603-FCB1245C-D023-4F98-A942-39A41B3CDB68 Q38886559-CF6D3543-D42B-4426-8C16-6CC25358AFAA Q38916624-DE63A912-1D8C-4388-9252-D8DA7221CA43 Q38970649-E6C77817-7668-4FFA-955A-2F9B415128FE Q39117151-600AF0F8-E1B0-4D2D-AEB1-4BF0B856C7A2 Q39160593-90D09C4D-4BCF-44F5-8000-2CA5CF1D7674 Q39333352-DA08AFDF-1C24-4BDD-B507-62210BED93E7 Q39532258-3FE37112-BD98-4640-AFD5-E93B1358F242 Q40266329-49D6609E-D392-4154-8B09-CC63CD7D534D Q40677977-5A7F20CD-2776-4E59-9AEE-B075B195797F Q44687190-CABB642A-1109-44F0-AF5B-A3289E1809B0 Q46009970-65816D65-1CFC-4DD5-B2C0-47A7CC345993 Q47878042-4B53FFB0-6355-4CF5-B24E-BCC49C48626E Q48232522-6E0B0051-8345-47D2-AD53-42374217F61A Q48606009-9CB5674E-0FDE-48DF-9033-C6B1EF0FD6FD Q48693325-8A203B4E-05B6-440B-9F77-F243B5D05653 Q50752542-BB819C5E-4EC9-4A0E-B211-1C319D89ADBE Q51029997-37AC6D9A-49D3-45A2-B1D8-3BFC1F67BD14 Q51554683-47F47D8A-B6FD-4252-BE25-907335164964 Q52718345-9F2694AB-BD37-4DE1-8DFD-19B8BDBD48C2

P2860

One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33599092

description

2009 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2009 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2009 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2009年の論文

@ja

2009年論文

@yue

2009年論文

@zh-hant

2009年論文

@zh-hk

2009年論文

@zh-mo

2009年論文

@zh-tw

2009年论文

@wuu

name

One-year follow-up after sacro ...... e descent: a randomized study.

@ast

One-year follow-up after sacro ...... e descent: a randomized study.

@en

type

label

One-year follow-up after sacro ...... e descent: a randomized study.

@ast

One-year follow-up after sacro ...... e descent: a randomized study.

@en

prefLabel

One-year follow-up after sacro ...... e descent: a randomized study.

@ast

One-year follow-up after sacro ...... e descent: a randomized study.

@en

P1433

Q33599092-CD6B0699-CD01-44E2-9D5F-68CD666DD82E

P1476

Q33599092-652D2FBB-C6C5-4E19-BCF1-7D230B238213

P2093

Q33599092-3942DD2C-0C36-4A5D-AD7F-44B50D30B060

Q33599092-640476F3-0A7E-4DF6-A2C8-B4C6AD7EE419

Q33599092-95151CBD-72F7-442D-A604-0394EA1986C0

Q33599092-BCCF031C-AB01-4554-8871-70924B713E3C

Q33599092-ED059745-89E1-4E18-B95A-583FA9771E87

P2860

Q33599092-1440FBA2-A78D-4661-83AA-BA06C52BB742

Q33599092-2FC9F549-3E0E-4C7C-9D1F-92A235C1576C

Q33599092-65F7DCD4-B8BB-43F2-AFED-063BEFEBD981

Q33599092-E223D473-6D8B-4D6F-AE38-E44359406A72

Q33599092-ED042320-B0D2-4A5C-A35D-6E81BD105E11

P2888

Q33599092-0FF5D875-2EA9-4EDC-B14F-3FF6A426F2E8

P304

Q33599092-31C209AB-C0B9-4733-8D14-D13BCCC10800

P31

Q33599092-CB0F35CF-4534-4D5C-A481-03483F108260

P356

Q33599092-4385CFDC-B8D6-4DE0-9181-4EA8458E3ABF

P433

Q33599092-5961E8CD-CE95-464F-AB44-ED8D6038B769

P478

Q33599092-BBC88401-89CC-4D36-88F4-0283645898DF

P577

Q33599092-A1B964DB-754D-40FC-B8E6-4D8F02B4AF4C

P5875

Q33599092-8FBC3AE3-3C53-41D7-B614-3ED6AF76D8CD

P6179

Q33599092-CAB2D125-9862-43EC-8257-3EC805A4386F

P698

Q33599092-157D63D1-53BC-4EA0-A0BF-469A96FAD36B

P921

Q33599092-EC460F30-8ACD-4A3A-AADD-05AB5F730A1F

Q33599092-FD567235-2902-450B-BD1D-3D85C0228417

P932

Q33599092-19554AE6-FA24-4436-BF2D-9F48B50E1A7C

P356

S00192-009-1014-7

P1433

International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

P1476

One-year follow-up after sacro ...... e descent: a randomized study.

@en

P2093

Carl H van der Vaart

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Peter Heintz

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Steven E Schraffordt Koops

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Viviane Dietz

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yolanda van der Graaf

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Surgical management of uterine prolapse in young women.

Sexual functioning after vaginal hysterectomy or transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension for uterine prolapse: a comparison.

Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal clinical trials: coping with the challenge of missing values.

Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited.

P2888

s00192-009-1014-7

P304

209-216

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00192-009-1014-7

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

21

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2009-10-16T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

38015876

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1002021919

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

19834635

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

P932

2808513

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string