Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in five leading Chinese medical journals - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in five leading Chinese medical journals

Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in five leading Chinese medical journals

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33651237

about

Aminophylline for bradyasystolic cardiac arrest in adults Aminophylline for bradyasystolic cardiac arrest in adults Reporting quality of abstracts in phase III clinical trials of systemic therapy in metastatic solid malignancies A systematic review of Chinese randomized clinical trials of SSRI treatment of depression Reporting characteristics of cancer pain: a systematic review and quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals.Characteristics of randomized trials published in Latin America and the Caribbean according to funding source The rate commitment to ISO 214 standard among the persian abstracts of approved research projects at school of health management and medical informatics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Forty-five years of schizophrenia trials in Italy: a survey.Abstracts reporting of HIV/AIDS randomized controlled trials in general medicine and infectious diseases journals: completeness to date and improvement in the quality since CONSORT extension for abstracts.Worldwide trends in volume and quality of published protocols of randomized controlled trials Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis.A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and m Pharmacy journal abstracts published in PubMed that abide by the CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines.Quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading journals of periodontology and implant dentistry: a survey.Reporting completeness of abstracts of systematic reviews published in leading dental specialty journals.Reporting of critical care trial abstracts: a comparison before and after the announcement of CONSORT guideline for abstracts Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis.Schizophrenia trials conducted in African countries: a drop of evidence in the ocean of morbidity?Barriers to translating EU and US CVD guidelines into practice in China.Structure formats of randomised controlled trial abstracts: a cross-sectional analysis of their current usage and association with methodology reporting.Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways?Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts on age-related macular degeneration health care: a cross-sectional quantification of the adherence to CONSORT abstract reporting recommendations.

P2860

Q24187691-492A8172-580E-4FC7-92E9-B5B88315EA36 Q24200423-89791087-6EBF-459C-AD46-BDEF4F710CCC Q26801019-1546C571-8978-47AB-8106-CA80E9392BD9 Q26829417-44AE7C96-B34B-4222-859B-863902721495 Q33919787-DEB0BDD5-3564-4E91-AEBE-E6B21DAE34A3 Q34590075-7D579FE7-35B1-404A-A095-850F0FFEB4D5 Q35205162-CAEA2454-4F0B-4D7A-B7B5-19EAFF6FCD7B Q35996302-852F89C3-4AEF-4A16-97DA-22A44EEE02A2 Q36163056-90D7F52E-A399-4EF1-95A2-051B357E3A3D Q36309066-D780E713-6F77-4131-A9C3-FBC42BFF3A44 Q37177363-2E66A669-AF74-41B0-A154-7225B8547DBF Q37340837-FFD71EDE-0ECA-40B2-A3D5-183056094428 Q37706127-40DCB2CF-2AB0-4FF9-8E5A-AC3FEA045932 Q37973396-5FEED8B2-1A53-46AF-82CA-C7C734098478 Q38089321-00FB93FD-DE5A-4FD6-8140-C8A73E94354F Q39097328-DF9BFF35-3097-431A-8CCB-604C8E2D2BB5 Q41894515-230133FB-1FC7-47E8-843B-B4E398936944 Q42326625-19BDF75A-9EB6-4BDF-B254-1651BD34F008 Q47206945-C569CD2C-9F1A-4E4A-BCD9-A85A42A29DDE Q47566435-281F2DFE-AB14-45CE-B8A9-3FC3CAC2F363 Q53528573-B6E46589-71B0-4F9E-82AC-2B90573422A0 Q55009572-E39B52DF-9EE3-436D-9140-4241D1796A01

P2860

Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in five leading Chinese medical journals

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33651237

description

2010 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2010 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2010 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2010年の論文

@ja

2010年論文

@yue

2010年論文

@zh-hant

2010年論文

@zh-hk

2010年論文

@zh-mo

2010年論文

@zh-tw

2010年论文

@wuu

name

Assessment of the quality of r ...... ading Chinese medical journals

@ast

Assessment of the quality of r ...... ading Chinese medical journals

@en

type

label

Assessment of the quality of r ...... ading Chinese medical journals

@ast

Assessment of the quality of r ...... ading Chinese medical journals

@en

prefLabel

Assessment of the quality of r ...... ading Chinese medical journals

@ast

Assessment of the quality of r ...... ading Chinese medical journals

@en

P1433

Q33651237-A989E8F0-B0E1-4721-8CA9-2F19714E68B3

P1476

Q33651237-2884FE77-663F-4CC7-AD28-A3B8DB45F45E

P2093

Q33651237-3B321EE3-B6D8-4706-B8FD-A99EA367E6AE

Q33651237-59F1069C-FA8D-448E-8B5D-39D2EE163F4F

Q33651237-7E3242DA-C512-4631-B1E3-596688DC6E26

Q33651237-A8AA8833-DF7C-4C98-8D09-201934D46A7C

Q33651237-B322B847-233F-4E09-9E4E-3A05910E7056

Q33651237-E16EDFF9-324D-4923-82A1-8CDC9DE2030F

Q33651237-FBB4F93E-7263-4911-925E-1E3177B4F73D

P2860

Q33651237-120216B4-15B5-4E9D-9E99-8B75E23555FA

Q33651237-1C2B3D55-F68A-4CB1-A272-3DF83A3F0BFD

Q33651237-23630C59-CFEF-4AE3-9D6A-E3A8D2BDD4B1

Q33651237-2D172561-186C-40EB-B767-A033E2B8C61F

Q33651237-2E28D03E-4ABB-4DBC-8FE4-989CB7C46185

Q33651237-4F4A4119-2706-4FFF-8825-88C0322548B3

Q33651237-56913123-5923-4EAE-94F8-2A97D481690B

Q33651237-83F55267-2271-430D-997D-2F238642BC40

Q33651237-859344DD-AD8B-4DEB-8B66-9D39B7B52B37

Q33651237-86334A15-0344-4325-B10E-82E2B9FB595C

P304

Q33651237-BE293575-4DE5-4001-B6E8-0FAEC3BF4481

P31

Q33651237-BE7C3F9C-2F79-497E-9E20-9B9873075F90

P356

Q33651237-97BEEFCE-078B-4074-8170-DF6467457B8B

P407

Q33651237-9EAAA36E-C011-4BB0-95A6-73D812F90E07

P433

Q33651237-893A0949-09F2-4C0C-B22C-5632A1B30977

P478

Q33651237-AA53FA71-6F46-49DC-95A4-29589A0F08F2

P577

Q33651237-DFC816B9-74B1-452D-9D42-9963B8FF5D5C

P5875

Q33651237-597A01A2-F513-4B5E-84FC-F62AF9D734EB

P698

Q33651237-4499386C-9C9D-426B-B3A5-6DAC74A06EC8

P932

Q33651237-3F9794EC-3D97-4AA7-86B7-51C1654CDC58

P356

JOURNAL.PONE.0011926

P1433

P1476

Assessment of the quality of r ...... ading Chinese medical journals

@en

P2093

Changlin Ai

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jing Li

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ling Wang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mingming Zhang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sally Hopewell

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yaolong Chen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yurong Duan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Quality of abstracts in 3 clinical dermatology journals.

CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration.

Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed.

The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine: a survey of 13 randomly selected journals from mainland China.

For randomized controlled trials, the quality of reports of complementary and alternative medicine was as good as reports of conventional medicine.

The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement.

An assessment of the quality of randomised controlled trials conducted in China.

The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.

Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals.

Family physicians' use of medical abstracts to guide decision making: style or substance?

P304

e11926

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0011926

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

5

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2010-08-02T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

45509233

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

20689853

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

2914031

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string