Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated Measures - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated Measures

Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated Measures

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33750745

about

Qualitative Versus Quantitative Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: Applications for the US and Abroad Quantitative Volumetric K-Means Cluster Segmentation of Fibroglandular Tissue and Skin in Breast MRI.Synthesized Mammography: Clinical Evidence, Appearance, and Implementation.

P2860

Q33850485-E9B0A003-B87B-498B-BFA7-2C731F9550BC Q47642637-EEDA8AA3-0A91-4634-A6A8-0BAF5CB5F6F7 Q52607623-D9ACF7E5-3C38-48EA-AB23-FEAF22EE2D75

P2860

Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated Measures

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33750745

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2017 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年論文

@yue

2017年論文

@zh-hant

2017年論文

@zh-hk

2017年論文

@zh-mo

2017年論文

@zh-tw

2017年论文

@wuu

name

Agreement between Breast Perce ...... ohort Using Automated Measures

@ast

Agreement between Breast Perce ...... ohort Using Automated Measures

@en

type

label

Agreement between Breast Perce ...... ohort Using Automated Measures

@ast

Agreement between Breast Perce ...... ohort Using Automated Measures

@en

prefLabel

Agreement between Breast Perce ...... ohort Using Automated Measures

@ast

Agreement between Breast Perce ...... ohort Using Automated Measures

@en

P1433

Q33750745-4DFA8B5C-64F5-4919-82B7-7F8F0331666C

P1476

Q33750745-F53BFDBA-E827-4677-B8C6-BDAF1CA8708B

P2093

Q33750745-0D5230F6-D322-4031-8D00-FA65AEC54E1B

Q33750745-1DD88610-E4B8-41F8-A36A-806E0F5DE40F

Q33750745-2EE51F3B-3396-4370-B971-EFD7A7D2D97D

Q33750745-88AD8D0B-E729-477F-BCAA-8CD58AD9F92D

Q33750745-A0E08AB3-D170-49C4-8ECF-2BC1C3F42BCD

P2860

Q33750745-0D980D3E-B747-4B94-B3BE-EB7D48DBE1C5

Q33750745-0EE9AEB4-64B7-474A-82EF-E8103F23BA32

Q33750745-1D2440FD-909A-4399-AEBF-5FCD91410544

Q33750745-22A19D68-3051-4A3D-8BF8-4EDA3474A832

Q33750745-286A67EA-EFC8-494C-AC26-EAEF0708263E

Q33750745-2B1EC029-ED18-44FE-82B2-6FBCAA451E20

Q33750745-2BC2F171-542C-432E-BDEE-28ABAF4031B8

Q33750745-385582CD-02EA-4046-B70C-C2861D051208

Q33750745-3E96A687-8852-4598-96BC-771880CE46FC

Q33750745-4582353B-13D9-4EBB-B9C9-48C7225E9953

P304

Q33750745-B7177954-ABE7-4C2B-A3B1-8BB999F5E62E

P31

Q33750745-BE3F76C7-972A-4F4A-9DEF-2ACC5FF99D0D

P356

Q33750745-49959EB5-2FD6-4FA0-A0DE-4A6A58047E8B

P407

Q33750745-1F2F33CB-7153-4B91-85A6-65F80B750504

P433

Q33750745-B863ED07-BE4C-4FD4-9082-426A7311A74A

P478

Q33750745-59701054-29CA-4E0D-97EE-FC9B94ACFCA0

P50

Q33750745-1E81597A-A49C-432A-BCE1-F2A7CA0DC9CC

P577

Q33750745-3082EBE5-C000-40AC-BB26-4820A8764CA4

P698

Q33750745-12356B66-3F5A-4393-AFB3-07C1A1B10CA0

P932

Q33750745-9C475D28-3C87-4085-93BD-FAC7759BE7F6

P356

RADIOL.2016161286

P1433

P1476

Agreement between Breast Perce ...... ohort Using Automated Measures

@en

P2093

Aimilia Gastounioti

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Brad M Keller

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Despina Kontos

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Emily F Conant

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lauren Pantalone

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Vision 20/20: Mammographic breast density and its clinical applications

Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods

Comparison of fully and semi-automated area-based methods for measuring mammographic density and predicting breast cancer risk

Assessing within-woman changes in mammographic density: a comparison of fully versus semi-automated area-based approaches

Assessment of a fully automated, high-throughput mammographic density measurement tool for use with processed digital mammograms

Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer

Reliability of the percent density in digital mammography with a semi-automated thresholding method.

Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.

Screening outcomes following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in a general-population screening program.

Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer

P304

673-680

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1148/RADIOL.2016161286

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

283

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2017-01-25T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

28121523

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

5452882

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string