Comparative validity of three methods for assessment of the quality of primary health care.

Comparative validity of three methods for assessment of the quality of primary health care.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33773226
Assessing the Quality of Sick Child Care Provided by Community Health WorkersAn evaluation of methods for assessing the quality of case management for inpatients with malaria in Benin.Unannounced standardized patients: a promising method of assessing patient-centered care in your health care system.The quality of clinical maternal and neonatal healthcare - a strategy for identifying 'routine care signal functions'Development and Validation of an Index to Measure the Quality of Facility-Based Labor and Delivery Care Processes in Sub-Saharan Africa.Evaluation of a volunteer community-based health worker program for providing contraceptive services in Madagascar.Adherence to management guidelines in acute respiratory infections and diarrhoea in children under 5 years old in primary health care in Botswana.Satisfaction with Quality of Care Received by Patients without National Health Insurance Attending a Primary Care Clinic in a Resource-Poor Environment of a Tertiary Hospital in Eastern Nigeria in the Era of Scaling up the Nigerian Formal Sector HeaComparison of methods for assessing quality of care for community case management of sick children: an application with community health workers in MalawiQuality of care provided to febrile children presenting in rural private clinics on the Kenyan coast.Community health workers adherence to referral guidelines: evidence from studies introducing RDTs in two malaria transmission settings in Uganda.Quality in intensive care units: proposal of an assessment instrument.A literature review of quantitative indicators to measure the quality of labor and delivery care.Empowering patients or general practitioners? A randomised clinical trial to improve quality in reproductive health care in Belgium.Measuring effective coverage of curative child health services in rural Burkina Faso: a cross-sectional study.Observe Before You Leap: Why Observation Provides Critical Insights for Formative Research and Intervention Design That You'll Never Get From Focus Groups, Interviews, or KAP Surveys.“They'll Change What They're Doing If They Know that You're Watching”: Measuring Reactivity in Health Behavior Because of an Observer's Presence— A Case from the Peruvian Amazon
P2860

Comparative validity of three methods for assessment of the quality of primary health care.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33773226
description
1999 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1999 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1999 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1999年の論文
@ja
1999年論文
@yue
1999年論文
@zh-hant
1999年論文
@zh-hk
1999年論文
@zh-mo
1999年論文
@zh-tw
1999年论文
@wuu
name
Comparative validity of three ...... uality of primary health care.
@ast
Comparative validity of three ...... uality of primary health care.
@en
type
label
Comparative validity of three ...... uality of primary health care.
@ast
Comparative validity of three ...... uality of primary health care.
@en
prefLabel
Comparative validity of three ...... uality of primary health care.
@ast
Comparative validity of three ...... uality of primary health care.
@en
P1433
P1476
P2093
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P577
P5875
P698
P356
P1433
P1476
Comparative validity of three ...... uality of primary health care.
@en
P2093
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P577
P5875
P698