Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies? - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?

Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33797843

about

Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial.Measuring agreement between rating interpretations and binary clinical interpretations of images: a simulation study of methods for quantifying the clinical relevance of an observer performance paradigm.Listening to Women: Expectations and Experiences in Breast Imaging A nonparametric procedure for comparing the areas under correlated LROC curves Estimating the receiver operating characteristic curve in studies that match controls to cases on covariates.Estimating the relative utility of screening mammography.The Reproducibility of Changes in Diagnostic Figures of Merit Across Laboratory and Clinical Imaging Reader Studies.

P2860

Q33620494-8C5515DB-816E-4637-9A3D-5B0E79246EED Q35961719-F3161E64-49D9-4B6A-9B8D-6ED134822C76 Q36108606-8CD2E81A-3A86-46DF-B65E-A8A259E6CB86 Q36746611-EED5A6D8-0576-44BB-B5A1-6DDBD7F1B87C Q36920209-8E21D620-F509-4130-B502-35795BBD487C Q40084415-0247FB45-0776-4123-86AD-C47A65E5D529 Q40482756-D752DCC7-AFB2-48C0-8BFE-05C0C751EDE0

P2860

Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33797843

description

2010 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2010 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2010 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2010年の論文

@ja

2010年論文

@yue

2010年論文

@zh-hant

2010年論文

@zh-hk

2010年論文

@zh-mo

2010年論文

@zh-tw

2010年论文

@wuu

name

Is an ROC-type response truly ...... observer performance studies?

@ast

Is an ROC-type response truly ...... observer performance studies?

@en

type

label

Is an ROC-type response truly ...... observer performance studies?

@ast

Is an ROC-type response truly ...... observer performance studies?

@en

prefLabel

Is an ROC-type response truly ...... observer performance studies?

@ast

Is an ROC-type response truly ...... observer performance studies?

@en

P1433

Q33797843-1349B300-D77A-40BC-B948-3A7A1656111A

P1476

Q33797843-B5B80AD4-5162-4CDB-83B0-D30CBB783E74

P2093

Q33797843-3536CD66-7838-48E0-8429-EF434558FD8F

Q33797843-3D8D1038-9A0C-4361-8D06-E207CE8BAEA2

Q33797843-58BFA873-D638-4A89-881E-2CD5BB5F8A14

Q33797843-89263D17-E11B-4634-A606-1E3FE398CC35

Q33797843-ADCC5BDB-698A-4289-AC6A-15BC091F6A13

Q33797843-D8EA430F-3272-4CF9-BAE7-3D3945790B6F

Q33797843-F23C2517-1784-420F-81DA-10A96387F1D7

Q33797843-F399BA82-A00E-4CE6-8660-FF3D0814D902

P2860

Q33797843-0E3083EE-6A49-414B-87BF-256314699435

Q33797843-162A108C-2B5F-4396-A603-7D7C635BF3D0

Q33797843-1FA4CB4A-A957-4318-8E98-EB2047267B84

Q33797843-44F61650-B03C-4A52-970D-CA6CDEAA4B70

Q33797843-45A19C0E-1107-44C7-86CB-9F8B917D2C60

Q33797843-5271D817-47E8-4BC2-B09B-C3C12E69BAB8

Q33797843-6219A88E-6CC0-4F37-8E4B-6527BF10CB6B

Q33797843-6C3EDCBC-73BD-4899-80B1-99229A09475E

Q33797843-86BA2357-A60B-48A9-8706-26A867957934

Q33797843-99B1AB84-90DD-4584-A3A5-A41B9A7813E6

P304

Q33797843-6144A4B7-01B8-48A5-BFAF-8DC9AE38E916

P31

Q33797843-2E818A6C-9425-42CD-90DB-9FE76436F566

P356

Q33797843-5F124E9A-7BD9-487F-BBB2-658757025CC4

P433

Q33797843-B1F68C35-12AF-46AC-AE21-75C74600BA13

P478

Q33797843-6DE3CAAB-BCA7-4299-B77E-5CAA1B7F584B

P577

Q33797843-8AC88A43-264A-4A9D-A25F-DA324BA87C0B

P5875

Q33797843-6FA14C33-B1F8-44BD-91B6-1E3998892530

P698

Q33797843-8917CA4C-F052-460C-BA4E-42C1549D40B8

P932

Q33797843-E513EB92-7095-4517-97D7-A1FD8F9E79A3

P356

J.ACRA.2009.12.012

P1433

Academic Radiology

P1476

Is an ROC-type response truly ...... observer performance studies?

@en

P2093

Andriy I Bandos

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Christiane M Hakim

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

David Gur

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Denise M Chough

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Howard E Rockette

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jules H Sumkin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Margarita L Zuley

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Marie A Ganott

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial

Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography

The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

A comparison of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz and Obuchowski-Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.

Collecting 48,000 CT exams for the lung screening study of the National Lung Screening Trial.

The prevalence effect in a laboratory environment: Changing the confidence ratings.

Pulmonary nodules: estimation of malignancy at thin-section helical CT--effect of computer-aided diagnosis on performance of radiologists.

"Binary" and "non-binary" detection tasks: are current performance measures optimal?

Agreement of the order of overall performance levels under different reading paradigms.

The "laboratory" effect: comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations.

P304

639-645

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1016/J.ACRA.2009.12.012

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

5

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

17

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2010-03-16T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

42254902

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

20236840

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

2856622

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string