Interpreting the results of secondary end points and subgroup analyses in clinical trials: should we lock the crazy aunt in the attic?
about
Interventions to improve return to work in depressed peopleSelenium supplementation for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseaseElectroconvulsive therapy for depressionInterventions to improve occupational health in depressed peopleGuidelines for the Reporting of Treatment Trials for Alcohol Use DisordersRecommendations for the Design and Analysis of Treatment Trials for Alcohol Use DisordersResearch Review: Emanuel Miller Memorial Lecture 2012 - neuroscientific studies of intervention for language impairment in children: interpretive and methodological problemsWhy not prescribe the best drugs for hypertension now?Evaluating guidelines across primary care-secondary care interface. Methodological weaknesses and poor reporting undermine authors' conclusions.A nutrient approach to prostate cancer prevention: The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT).Selenium and prostate cancer prevention: insights from the selenium and vitamin E cancer prevention trial (SELECT).Is the randomized clinical trial the gold standard of research?Is a subgroup claim believable? A user's guide to subgroup analyses in the surgical literatureSubgroup analysis of large trials can guide further research: a case study of vitamin E and pneumoniaTranscranial magnetic stimulation for treating depression.Effects of wheat and oat-based whole grain foods on serum lipoprotein size and distribution in overweight middle aged people: a randomised controlled trial.Using effectiveness studies for prescribing research, part 2.Evaluation of the Prevention and Reactivation Care Program (PreCaP) for the hospitalized elderly: a prospective nonrandomized controlled trial.Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic reviewRealism in evidence based medicine: interpreting the randomised controlled trial.Cluster randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of primary care mental health workersHow well does the evidence on pioglitazone back up researchers' claims for a reduction in macrovascular events?What can we do about exploratory analyses in clinical trials?Predicting who will benefit from an Expert Patients Programme self-management course.The STICH trial (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure): mode-of-death results.Using Bayes factors for testing hypotheses about intervention effectiveness in addictions research.Does prior exposure to stimulants in children with ADHD impact cardiovascular parameters from lisdexamfetamine dimesylate?Vitamin E and the risk of pneumonia: using the I 2 statistic to quantify heterogeneity within a controlled trial.Toll-like Receptor Expression and Signaling in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Correlate With Clinical Outcomes in Acute Hepatitis C Virus Infection.Multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial of perhexiline as a metabolic modulator to augment myocardial protection in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy undergoing cardiac surgery.Therapeutic inferences for individual patients.Does dalteparin PROTECT better than heparin?Vitamin D and tuberculosisClopidogrel reloading in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention on chronic clopidogrel therapy: results of the ARMYDA-4 RELOAD (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) randomized trial.Effect of subretinal injection on retinal structure and function in a rat oxygen-induced retinopathy model.Individualised mindfulness-based stress reduction for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy of curative intent: a descriptive pilot study.Effects of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy and physical exercise on sick leave and employment in primary care patients with depression: two subgroup analyses.Ophthalmic statistics note 7: multiple hypothesis testing—to adjust or not to adjust.Is 'starting on time' useful (or useless) as a surrogate measure for 'surgical theatre efficiency'?Do shock absorbing insoles in recruits undertaking high levels of physical activity reduce lower limb injury? A randomized controlled trial.
P2860
Q24187462-B04F5901-FF71-4CA4-A911-97512AA47708Q24201670-D075C5C5-8B26-43FB-915F-F362384FB125Q24234841-0AF9CFF0-9520-481E-AD8F-F06016AC5C35Q24243142-BC1062C1-8CA6-4793-80C8-08D3B918F3AAQ26779440-00F7F73F-3C96-4893-887C-2A90804863E1Q27013929-701E982E-D3E7-4B84-B245-05CF6F1B940CQ27013961-920C9DCF-060D-4536-852C-E6595F00CF22Q30333019-75416682-699E-4DA3-95CE-3102CD9A2EDFQ33807431-FF40F91A-E643-4A4B-8A78-7E9D1BAF1195Q34142018-1E3645CF-D069-42C1-969B-D6CC381612B2Q34336747-925391DA-A219-4EDA-A5F4-8CD5FE676DA6Q34432594-FA9BBD85-231B-4F6F-9826-953E30283E4EQ34527654-E37BF821-4CC4-4E5E-BB08-FFC8F06252A6Q34612178-26642ED2-4D31-4CC2-A320-656743F8AD02Q34699266-EE029D25-A8BA-4A8B-ABC7-FC8596759D36Q34935059-EBC5B06D-06AB-4DB8-A1C0-A86B1A4856BAQ35020901-A34045A6-08A9-4661-8808-E4754469D1ABQ35298386-B1B31765-16E1-44C9-AEA2-6EE6F296FD16Q35813697-6F95AEBF-8621-4B44-82C0-FACD31E7E2C6Q35887072-FF636EEB-F7C4-4803-86B7-ED5DFEB96686Q36093455-58DAD415-EF7C-4B4B-B22A-CD98B8CFD1BDQ36279476-1A53A709-E87B-4FA5-961B-D347F792BC50Q36359600-F018B849-EC6E-4755-A925-D450048D4CFCQ36474069-C28E9F3B-070A-4104-A506-73EAD00E53D7Q37312814-25B8131C-69E7-475D-B7DB-AFA5886DC2FAQ37417696-ACC34F3A-67BD-4E32-8D31-F9C64382477EQ39834928-33FA3706-2BDE-4448-B159-C0BA8529C2F6Q40485461-5A035A2F-09C5-40F9-B10C-799B93EA6E02Q40708778-A8B8286A-AA12-4ACE-9B59-2ECC3CC90CF9Q41652782-C04A0B8F-B286-44AF-8B0B-B074031C5748Q41685481-1F61B0F6-6764-4B24-9F8F-3B2ECA40E088Q42223536-B9BE89B0-91ED-4B0A-B909-E46BB4197934Q42426556-0B8B261A-194E-49A2-ABE7-BD890F17E417Q43110182-98F6B440-F55A-422F-8D7E-7CB27B4306F0Q47113822-7D46C764-A25B-4454-BFCA-97816D111F8FQ47575453-C4D60CE2-64AD-49E0-8485-E8EF8727D0A5Q47757400-621D3335-D908-4268-A4DF-5B7B0233B0C0Q48165989-23FFCC9A-CD2A-4257-9E3B-33AADD21BBE7Q48169845-2B0DE398-B284-49E4-9151-3CF50C4AAD57Q51295111-5C54DA9E-C9CB-40BC-A19B-A837652D0990
P2860
Interpreting the results of secondary end points and subgroup analyses in clinical trials: should we lock the crazy aunt in the attic?
description
2001 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2001 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2001 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2001年の論文
@ja
2001年論文
@yue
2001年論文
@zh-hant
2001年論文
@zh-hk
2001年論文
@zh-mo
2001年論文
@zh-tw
2001年论文
@wuu
name
Interpreting the results of se ...... k the crazy aunt in the attic?
@ast
Interpreting the results of se ...... k the crazy aunt in the attic?
@en
type
label
Interpreting the results of se ...... k the crazy aunt in the attic?
@ast
Interpreting the results of se ...... k the crazy aunt in the attic?
@en
prefLabel
Interpreting the results of se ...... k the crazy aunt in the attic?
@ast
Interpreting the results of se ...... k the crazy aunt in the attic?
@en
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Interpreting the results of se ...... k the crazy aunt in the attic?
@en
P2093
Freemantle N
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJ.322.7292.989
P407
P577
2001-04-01T00:00:00Z