Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality.
about
Overestimating outcome rates: statistical estimation when reliability is suboptimalProfiling quality of care: Is there a role for peer review?Clinical peer review in the United States: history, legal development and subsequent abuseAdverse drug events in older hospitalized patients: results and reliability of a comprehensive and structured identification strategyA new implicit review instrument for measuring quality of care delivered to pediatric patients in the emergency departmentPhysician cost profiling--reliability and risk of misclassificationHospital deaths and adverse events in Brazil.Sins of omission: getting too little medical care may be the greatest threat to patient safety.The reliability of assessing the appropriateness of requested diagnostic tests.Application of a trigger tool in near real time to inform quality improvement activities: a prospective study in a general medicine ward.Measurement of patient safety: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of adverse event detection with record review.Preventable mortality evaluation in the ICUStrengths and weaknesses of working with the Global Trigger Tool method for retrospective record review: focus group interviews with team members.Detection of adverse events in a Scottish hospital using a consensus-based methodology.Agreement between drugs-to-avoid criteria and expert assessments of problematic prescribing.A structured implicit abstraction method to evaluate whether content of counseling before prostate cancer screening is consistent with recommendations by experts.Reducing interrater variability and improving health care: a meta-analytical review.Methods for assessing the preventability of adverse drug events: a systematic review.A structured judgement method to enhance mortality case note review: development and evaluation.Reviewing deaths in British and US hospitals: a study of two scales for assessing preventability.The prevalence of potentially preventable deaths in an acute care hospital: A retrospective cohort.The measurement of active errors: methodological issues.Commentary on Sharek: adverse events and errors-important to differentiate and difficult to measureHealth care accreditation surveyor styles typology.Two-epoch cross-sectional case record review protocol comparing quality of care of hospital emergency admissions at weekends versus weekdays.
P2860
Q24674055-68CFEE73-854B-4C16-8033-37AA237C61F5Q24796419-AC4237D4-051B-4502-B120-66206BD21C8EQ26830461-A7F23074-ED50-4DEA-AC74-6CE3490DBBA6Q28535074-978527F8-9A73-4066-9B62-F06AEF51C561Q33294929-23E6F24F-58E2-4B63-B2C6-220B9493ACAFQ33883885-6F9CD7E4-E045-411D-B452-2AAA01F18731Q34022361-B81BEF1D-12D2-47DC-A3AE-1CFF7CA43936Q34723789-9D669ACB-D02C-496A-830B-79403578A5BEQ35065035-C993B04C-A950-400B-9B22-F440D177FDA5Q35290897-BB871137-006D-4F7C-9E12-6FA130047D52Q36109869-68F36657-33AC-4F0E-B4C6-3B55B06C2717Q36925695-56523733-65D1-4BC9-9A0A-BD620ED83140Q37208299-A7AC53FC-BDB9-4854-9F19-77741F79F19FQ37340028-628668EA-2C64-4CC8-888C-084802FD5AD2Q37378459-29A57728-42C6-4ECE-A93C-6FDCE9D6B2F8Q37456772-DC06069C-FF28-4641-929B-44CD3D2FFF7FQ37897276-B92DDB13-E4AA-4000-8C02-3F5DC8AD8FDFQ37971470-561AC196-267B-45C7-9D65-4891B101C014Q38122669-33EE4D20-BB05-4252-9487-BBC87067FDB7Q38873905-CEF6ADD5-F90A-4D27-BD29-B7B0B18427B4Q38948317-9A2F30D9-403D-4096-87B1-8CD9CD78AF7AQ41814758-470CE9E7-AEFA-4A50-99A8-362B091794A4Q42704303-6BC782F4-28E4-43F9-ADF3-9EAF286C6E92Q46025272-7CB47EC8-6E51-49AD-83BB-315536E6FD0AQ47217964-1752A56B-EDDA-4A8E-847A-1F7D8A51D2D4
P2860
Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality.
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2000 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年論文
@yue
2000年論文
@zh-hant
2000年論文
@zh-hk
2000年論文
@zh-mo
2000年論文
@zh-tw
2000年论文
@wuu
name
Discussion between reviewers d ...... er review of hospital quality.
@ast
Discussion between reviewers d ...... er review of hospital quality.
@en
type
label
Discussion between reviewers d ...... er review of hospital quality.
@ast
Discussion between reviewers d ...... er review of hospital quality.
@en
prefLabel
Discussion between reviewers d ...... er review of hospital quality.
@ast
Discussion between reviewers d ...... er review of hospital quality.
@en
P2093
P1433
P1476
Discussion between reviewers d ...... er review of hospital quality.
@en
P2093
Bernstein SJ
DeMonner S
Hayward RA
P304
P356
10.1097/00005650-200002000-00005
P577
2000-02-01T00:00:00Z