Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions.
about
Ballast water regulations and the move toward concentration-based numeric discharge limits.Global ballast water management and the "same location" concept: a clear term or a clear issue?Relative invasion risk for plankton across marine and freshwater systems: examining efficacy of proposed international ballast water discharge standards.Prioritising surveillance for alien organisms transported as stowaways on ships travelling to South AfricaRelationship between propagule pressure and colonization pressure in invasion ecology: a test with ships' ballast.Attenuation and modification of the ballast water microbial community during voyages into the Canadian ArcticEffect of shipping traffic on biofouling invasion success at population and community levelsAbsolute estimates of the propagule pressure of viable dinoflagellates across Canadian coasts: the variable influence of ballast water exchangeInvasion risk of the pond slider turtle is underestimated when niche expansion occursBiological introduction risks from shipping in a warming ArcticCan tropical macrophytes establish in the Laurentian Great Lakes?Strength in size not numbers: propagule size more important than number in sexually reproducing populationsConfronting the wicked problem of managing biological invasionsPropagule pressure in the presence of uncertainty: extending the utility of proxy variables with hierarchical modelsHybrid system increases efficiency of ballast water treatmentAn overview of thirty years of research on ballast water as a vector for aquatic invasive species to freshwater and marine environmentsInvasion history and vector dynamics in coastal marine ecosystems: A North American perspectiveRichness–abundance relationships for zooplankton in ballast water: temperate versus Arctic comparisonsBiofouling animals in fresh water: biology, impacts, and ecosystem engineeringDomestic ships as a potential pathway of nonindigenous species from the Saint Lawrence River to the Great LakesRelative comparison and perspective on invasive species in the Laurentian and Swedish Great LakesA review of developments in ballast water managementClimate change, non-indigenous species and shipping: assessing the risk of species introduction to a high-Arctic archipelagoRapid Invasive Species Detection by Combining Environmental DNA with Light Transmission SpectroscopyOrigin matters: alien consumers inflict greater damage on prey populations than do native consumersFluctuating salinity improves survival of the invasive freshwater golden mussel at high salinity: implications for the introduction of aquatic species through estuarine portsPhysical dispersion and dilution of ballast water discharge in the St. Clair River: Implications for biological invasionsRole of domestic shipping in the introduction or secondary spread of nonindigenous species: biological invasions within the Laurentian Great LakesShip-borne Nonindigenous Species Diminish Great Lakes Ecosystem Services
P2860
Q34698464-D9D81860-916D-44A4-BA0D-8A1095B1BF2BQ34698524-BB080FE9-B42D-400F-9C7A-C9DF45DA0FD2Q35170826-512B1C59-63E8-440E-BCBF-1BBD2862B660Q36335717-2E0F8EFB-13CF-4FA6-9D4A-01ECA20EF9C3Q51169704-E449ADE2-7468-4ADB-96A5-EEF1FA7E3B03Q56333156-0FBC9BB5-6D87-410A-8847-23B9ADCBEE1FQ56378001-AAF15338-A837-4D18-A064-E0D84DDD43A1Q56384366-E10C0977-E65E-454E-9846-643CDCB81200Q56393603-BD64D555-61C9-4EA8-A2BB-249CFB2389B6Q56414608-AA026549-54A3-4928-BC1E-0AC251D55E25Q56418265-FF154502-A804-40D5-A2DF-1E48A7BBDBB7Q56418849-5F1565EA-FC30-4537-A346-26881BD3F59AQ56420483-972DCCCF-EF19-4111-BE3A-0A19637BA2E6Q56424739-B05AFB2F-F8EB-4556-934E-A2DB69B30013Q56435466-1E3FB144-C691-455B-86FC-1E508D4E686DQ56440984-586C96EE-C6E1-4E4B-93F5-8A254BE5F0FEQ56440995-891EBD36-6F1E-40CE-AC61-E8AC45AAEEB8Q56448509-0757829C-3AA4-4410-8D0D-BCB127D0193BQ56452443-84E2F298-526A-4050-9849-9888776B5B0AQ56452625-20CD7E18-F974-495E-A8AB-5ACCFEF0F648Q56458261-C61EE364-2BA1-4A27-9701-60D186B75B24Q56458662-15A0ECA0-138B-4F46-924C-41EDF4E9F5B6Q56459567-81CF61FC-CAC4-4167-B610-7F856DC0EA56Q56462445-FF186748-A2B0-46F7-8672-4B6059180145Q56487668-F70B9F37-AE72-4604-B155-7C7723653633Q56503558-E3F8BEEA-8B9D-4700-8450-3DB3BFBC671BQ56506796-9AA8DB8B-EF88-4964-834B-D08B47DAC90DQ56544143-AB32CAF1-8244-4EF5-AA07-5922AC3F4BC2Q56564078-A6A3E325-687F-40A4-9F3A-4B04708D240C
P2860
Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions.
@ast
Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions.
@en
type
label
Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions.
@ast
Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions.
@en
prefLabel
Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions.
@ast
Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions.
@en
P2093
P356
P1476
Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions.
@en
P2093
Chris J Wiley
Hugh J MacIsaac
Laurent Jean
Matthew G Deneau
P304
P356
10.1021/ES102655J
P407
P577
2011-03-09T00:00:00Z