Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients.
about
Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers for assisted reproductionContemporary genetic technologies and female reproductionEndometrial receptivity array: Clinical applicationWhy we should transfer frozen instead of fresh embryos: the translational rationaleAn endometrial gene expression signature accurately predicts recurrent implantation failure after IVF.Changes in the transcriptome of the human endometrial Ishikawa cancer cell line induced by estrogen, progesterone, tamoxifen, and mifepristone (RU486) as detected by RNA-sequencingHuman S100A10 plays a crucial role in the acquisition of the endometrial receptivity phenotype.Endometrial receptivity profile in patients with premature progesterone elevation on the day of HCG administration.Research resource: interactome of human embryo implantation: identification of gene expression pathways, regulation, and integrated regulatory networks.Reproductive efficiency of human oocytes fertilized in vitro.The effect of luteal phase progesterone supplementation on natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial.Early developing pig embryos mediate their own environment in the maternal tract.Physiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantationBioinformatic detection of E47, E2F1 and SREBP1 transcription factors as potential regulators of genes associated to acquisition of endometrial receptivityDifferent ART outcomes at increasing peak estradiol levels with long and antagonist protocols: retrospective insights from ten years experience.Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy.Human Endometrial Transcriptomics: Implications for Embryonic Implantation.Expression of PRB, FKBP52 and HB-EGF relating with ultrasonic evaluation of endometrial receptivity.Effect of luteal-phase support on endometrial microRNA expression following controlled ovarian stimulation.Outcomes of day 3 embryo transfer with vitrification using Cryoleaf: a 3-year follow-up study.Progesterone administration for luteal phase deficiency in human reproduction: an old or new issue?Comparison of the clinical outcomes between fresh blastocyst and vitrified-thawed blastocyst transferThe endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial comparing clinical results from natural modified cycle and exogenous hormone stimulation with GnRH agonistMinimal Stimulation In Vitro Fertilization: A Better Outcome.Compartmentalized gene expression profiling of receptive endometrium reveals progesterone regulated ENPP3 is differentially expressed and secreted in glycosylated form.Effect of progesterone supplementation on natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial.Endometrial signaling pathways during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction technology.Review: follicular waves in the human ovary: a new physiological paradigm for novel ovarian stimulation protocols.Deciphering the molecular basis of uterine receptivity.Assisted reproductive technology results: why are live-birth percentages so low?Abnormal implantation after fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles.Time-lapse observation and transcriptome analysis of a case with repeated multiple pronuclei after IVF/ICSI.Supraphysiologic estradiol is an independent predictor of low birth weight in full-term singletons born after fresh embryo transfer.Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.Colony stimulating factor-1 and leukemia inhibitor factor expression from current-cycle cannula isolated endometrial cells are associated with increased endometrial receptivity and pregnancy.Optimal embryo transfer strategy in poor response may include freeze-all.Endometrial response of beef heifers on day 7 following insemination to supraphysiological concentrations of progesterone associated with superovulation.Excessive ovarian stimulation up-regulates the Wnt-signaling molecule DKK1 in human endometrium and may affect implantation: an in vitro co-culture study.Endometrial gene expression analysis at the time of embryo implantation in women with unexplained infertility.
P2860
Q24195066-F505B1EB-5A73-45F3-9096-F3B4129CC9F6Q24635098-1DEB6D9C-A2BC-427C-AE9D-A85653AE89FBQ26779887-51AD6AB3-1C6B-4122-B6BE-778A617EB06EQ26853193-721BA7AA-8EEA-4489-921C-1BDB37F917EEQ27301455-4087F516-D4E1-4AD5-8B9C-1407AC0652D7Q28677420-972656B0-BF8E-496E-86E2-7D35F3C92BA5Q30787185-267C900F-48D0-4752-9277-9DF98C07F22FQ33616493-13E617D9-B093-48B3-8171-562C60A44E67Q33636729-62D8D48A-38D6-4A41-B939-716DB9E8D3A2Q33876800-3395DE00-1F87-42A6-B219-E39012B0DF57Q34011784-8C20F1E6-F3D2-47F2-A501-312937923CEDQ34070191-64F97620-9B6F-4DD9-9C96-B74C60E3C5DEQ34217411-D5A47C18-774A-4647-9844-9E59E8075A8FQ34320970-825BD67A-49B3-4B24-815E-D08DFB0BDCAEQ34578834-04737C66-3F90-4AC1-9180-2A32EA3D199CQ35205814-8EB97D09-4D46-4A8E-8922-6F7988533056Q35700751-D4A31C15-72E1-4A8D-8A9C-09C7354BD103Q35795576-6783A55F-7B2E-4C01-9934-75CCED1C9F6DQ35842550-0091CD3A-7074-4C2E-A503-19E3A2763B51Q36290928-B3158974-BCEA-4438-8B72-4C76C65BD66BQ36295584-6E01F3CD-C035-4AA5-908F-73073B593C4DQ36301761-33930EF3-7D65-47C0-895A-C900C92A9F34Q36484639-51B765A7-4176-4466-8840-2E7D5C2AC845Q37059999-84685A53-9E64-4C2B-B544-3100BB0E9BA8Q37101692-EDF85C3A-5E2C-4077-BE08-6B22518B279EQ37281960-318B2DB4-08F3-4942-B380-ED2BE7B463FDQ37362902-56582897-10B5-45E4-BDFC-F77D40AA4893Q37433468-960F00A8-2616-4312-9BA3-8E4DEBF03F13Q37741685-F25D1AE8-371E-4730-BF04-31D42649E954Q38052497-8EBA51D0-DBA1-417E-9189-8B656B583B0BQ38210367-6F6D2C6B-1DC7-4794-BADE-A2F9E2FF5643Q38401438-53A0ACDD-AFA7-4069-8952-DBCE2CDCC896Q38712780-7CD9C1D3-4E7E-4915-BCA6-A3D853BB83F2Q38785772-20E7F918-1E45-479D-9AED-C6791593C680Q38871869-23DE9236-3650-4F6F-A560-4510ABCC4BA0Q41494843-5FF88EBB-C354-4561-B678-02311E7576A2Q41597978-29D67848-18D5-4EED-9B4A-3E9D0778C034Q42715677-CEF0B34D-9F31-4DAE-A0BF-25B2E14E8FBDQ43231828-43DC262F-9440-4A07-958C-A91E7F71CEAFQ43603262-A40812FA-54EA-47EF-A4F0-67DDB08B54EA
P2860
Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2009 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
name
Gene expression profile of hum ...... cycles for the same patients.
@ast
Gene expression profile of hum ...... cycles for the same patients.
@en
type
label
Gene expression profile of hum ...... cycles for the same patients.
@ast
Gene expression profile of hum ...... cycles for the same patients.
@en
prefLabel
Gene expression profile of hum ...... cycles for the same patients.
@ast
Gene expression profile of hum ...... cycles for the same patients.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Gene expression profile of hum ...... d cycles for the same patients
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1093/HUMREP/DEP039
P407
P577
2009-02-26T00:00:00Z