Obstetrical outcome valuations by patients, professionals, and laypersons: differences within and between groups using three valuation methods.
about
A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.Correlation analysis of visual analogue scale and measures of walking ability in multiple sclerosis patients.
P2860
Obstetrical outcome valuations by patients, professionals, and laypersons: differences within and between groups using three valuation methods.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Նոյեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի նոյեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
Obstetrical outcome valuations ...... using three valuation methods.
@ast
Obstetrical outcome valuations ...... using three valuation methods.
@en
Obstetrical outcome valuations ...... using three valuation methods.
@nl
type
label
Obstetrical outcome valuations ...... using three valuation methods.
@ast
Obstetrical outcome valuations ...... using three valuation methods.
@en
Obstetrical outcome valuations ...... using three valuation methods.
@nl
prefLabel
Obstetrical outcome valuations ...... using three valuation methods.
@ast
Obstetrical outcome valuations ...... using three valuation methods.
@en
Obstetrical outcome valuations ...... using three valuation methods.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Obstetrical outcome valuations ...... using three valuation methods.
@en
P2093
Ben Wj Mol
Denise Bijlenga
Erwin Birnie
Gouke J Bonsel
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/1471-2393-11-93
P577
2011-11-12T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1021984247