Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)
about
Hemispheric specialization in selective attention and short-term memory: a fine-coarse model of left- and right-ear disadvantagesNeural organization of linguistic short-term memory is sensory modality-dependent: evidence from signed and spoken language.Coherence of the irrelevant-sound effect: individual profiles of short-term memory and susceptibility to task-irrelevant materialsThe impact of broadband noise on serial memory: changes in band-pass frequency increase disruption.The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory.Auditory distraction and short-term memory: phenomena and practical implications.Noise disturbance in open-plan study environments: a field study on noise sources, student tasks and room acoustic parameters.Irrelevant speech effects and sequence learning.Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.Cross-modal Informational Masking of Lipreading by Babble.Reification of phonological storage.Irrelevant speech effects and statistical learning.Evaluating models of working memory through the effects of concurrent irrelevant information.Sound source location modulates the irrelevant-sound effect.Visual distraction and visuo-spatial memory: a sandwich effect.Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall.Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression.Disruption by speech of serial short-term memory: the role of changing-state vowels.Articulatory suppression and the irrelevant-speech effect in short-term memory: does the locus of suppression matter?Office noise and employee concentration: identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements.The Relative and Perceived Impact of Irrelevant Speech, Vocal Music and Non-vocal Music on Working MemoryCan ‘Hebb’ Be Distracted? Testing the Susceptibility of Sequence Learning to Auditory DistractionBackground Sound Impairs Interruption Recovery in Dynamic Task Situations: Procedural Conflict?Attentional and perceptual sources of the auditory attentional blink
P2860
Q30444719-D1EFFBAB-12C9-4167-B938-F77B974A9225Q30487487-C66DC752-45BE-4955-9A9C-D202AEF3F875Q30490147-BD1E24A2-3CEB-4532-9F73-D2714CACC27EQ30539731-C4CDD68E-A2AB-4DD6-BC40-FDAF20E014A9Q34084929-9F964008-CD64-480D-98B8-E760BD130143Q34243690-7040EE7C-FCDB-4823-BDE2-4B7A9BBE2EE1Q34320301-3D4016E9-54BC-44BB-A803-3D3AF3005C6DQ38372307-DCE0BCC7-1B55-4A1C-B322-E4AA6CD1E215Q38396998-9D5BAFF1-C72F-440C-BC6C-5E788767B702Q38401757-B2731934-7965-44A7-8237-AA75B1EE1D48Q38418814-E0389941-80F2-422D-BF96-878DF2809A58Q38419072-A57823B6-A206-4DF9-9AE5-8DE17F90F00EQ38427405-A620888C-3034-4CAC-9D6C-F6FA12614C9DQ47094219-7A4A23CF-3AD1-4201-8A96-683054C0094CQ47424331-50D854FE-4AC0-4C7F-B588-8566A3B9DC78Q51870499-9AFDAD6A-958A-47D9-809A-573F8BFF498BQ51887411-00DFB20F-8A9F-4982-8688-074D4F281E7DQ51890608-B8017570-5DD9-4CB4-ABD9-59C6C45604B2Q51929199-33DAD891-9CAD-445B-88C6-92EC0573AE41Q51929756-4325A701-30CE-42FD-BF5F-31F29C4FB639Q51946169-5998C9AD-7F53-4700-8AE6-0417D3A0613AQ51956161-A277ABD3-38D6-4C28-83B8-DC0848CA6EAFQ51957870-40ADC47D-4561-4F94-B421-36A1A3D41ECEQ52004883-8AB521A3-D5DE-403B-BF20-1F9A250BE774Q52023985-53AAE109-3A7E-449A-9C80-7E5F2DD38E51Q52042384-92B70FFD-FB7A-48C9-8DF7-750359196737Q52563140-7901746C-5FBE-4CFD-B84D-B7E29866BB62Q56335094-02C7B07D-89A2-4DB7-A40F-0B233F73035CQ58173491-99CDC93D-D49A-41A3-BFAC-33F9C763791FQ58173521-D250A40F-AC0F-4B04-8982-09574FB62159Q58173546-C9507E4F-8DB2-46F8-8E01-90741D8EA274
P2860
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2000 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年論文
@yue
2000年論文
@zh-hant
2000年論文
@zh-hk
2000年論文
@zh-mo
2000年論文
@zh-tw
2000年论文
@wuu
name
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)
@ast
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)
@en
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath
@nl
type
label
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)
@ast
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)
@en
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath
@nl
prefLabel
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)
@ast
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)
@en
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)
@en
P2093
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.3758/BF03214370
P577
2000-09-01T00:00:00Z
P6179
1009027219