Prospective randomized double-blind pilot study of site-specific consensus atlas implementation for rectal cancer target volume delineation in the cooperative group setting.
about
Improving radiotherapy quality assurance in clinical trials: assessment of target volume delineation of the pre-accrual benchmark case.Development of a software for quantitative evaluation radiotherapy target and organ-at-risk segmentation comparison.Target Contour Testing/Instructional Computer Software (TaCTICS): A Novel Training and Evaluation Platform for Radiotherapy Target Delineation.Consequences of anorectal cancer atlas implementation in the cooperative group setting: radiobiologic analysis of a prospective randomized in silico target delineation study.Human-computer interaction in radiotherapy target volume delineation: a prospective, multi-institutional comparison of user input devices.A pilot prospective feasibility study of organ-at-risk definition using Target Contour Testing/Instructional Computer Software (TaCTICS), a training and evaluation platform for radiotherapy target delineation.Expert Consensus Contouring Guidelines for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.ACR appropriateness criteria® resectable rectal cancerProspective assessment of an atlas-based intervention combined with real-time software feedback in contouring lymph node levels and organs-at-risk in the head and neck: Quantitative assessment of conformance to expert delineation.Dosimetric impact of inter-observer variability for 3D conformal radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy: the rectal tumor target definition case.Quantitative assessment of target delineation variability for thymic cancers: Agreement evaluation of a prospective segmentation challenge.Uncertainties in target volume delineation in radiotherapy - are they relevant and what can we do about them?Automatic segmentation software in locally advanced rectal cancer: READY (REsearch program in Auto Delineation sYstem)-RECTAL 02: prospective study.Critical discussion of evaluation parameters for inter-observer variability in target definition for radiation therapy.Interobserver variation in parotid gland delineation: a study of its impact on intensity-modulated radiotherapy solutions with a systematic review of the literature.A review of interventions to reduce inter-observer variability in volume delineation in radiation oncology.Compared planning dosimetry of TOMO, VMAT and IMRT in rectal cancer with different simulated positions.The prognostic value of residual nodal disease following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer in patients with complete primary tumor response.Increasing consistency and accuracy in radiation therapy via educational interventions is not just limited to radiation oncologists.Reflections on the current status of commercial automated segmentation systems in clinical practice.Results of the Australasian (Trans-Tasman Oncology Group) radiotherapy benchmarking exercise in preparation for participation in the PORTEC-3 trial.Pelvic recurrence after definitive surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective investigation of implications for precision radiotherapy field design.Automatic segmentation of the clinical target volume and organs at risk in the planning CT for rectal cancer using deep dilated convolutional neural networks.Clinical validation of atlas-based auto-segmentation of pelvic volumes and normal tissue in rectal tumors using auto-segmentation computed system.Characterisation of rectal motion during neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer with image-guided tomotherapy: implications for adaptive dose escalation strategies.The role of delineation education programs for improving interobserver variability in target volume delineation in gastric cancer.The impact of contour variation on tumour control probability in anal cancer.Variability of clinical target volume delineation for rectal cancer patients planned for neoadjuvant radiotherapy with the aid of the platform Anatom-e.
P2860
Q27690859-200DAF2C-F588-4707-A225-952BD33F0E9EQ30486369-C55F3D01-6078-4BF3-9EF3-6B204B039A13Q34583833-DDA285A1-F9FF-4AAB-822B-1315846736CFQ34643927-1E0F2B28-5A04-4665-A9EF-D52C0A2E22A5Q35233429-E437A675-807F-4638-A669-F36626B61987Q35625117-AE3DF498-4CDF-46BE-A775-01EC74F1FD1CQ35783521-3D1111A4-8695-4E2E-84E8-C62DCBBB704BQ36371152-A49A06FE-E128-45B2-8043-D268FDCEF5C0Q36996679-608AC97C-9DD7-4248-8E63-5F19BF4D31DEQ37038061-E3ADD3B5-AA00-4CFF-9CE5-C076B5415D9DQ37201170-06EEDD47-97D8-4561-BB21-AA8AD0FD3A2BQ37258706-32E8ED3D-2ECE-4927-99F0-59783BE06459Q37520623-BEA696C9-8BA4-48E6-8990-48AB4EC91347Q37979128-B2D89C89-8976-4881-998D-4A0F0EDAF30EQ38027829-20BD060B-4419-4846-B28D-F23A284D8493Q38832522-212C7DB1-2E5C-4B63-9CF2-056C71B6A1F8Q41091862-9A78EBA5-3044-48B5-8F45-27BBFFC96057Q41333966-C31E4833-EAE9-4477-A036-D090CB343A21Q42396771-34FBD16E-1F67-4A68-B226-7034F5C667B9Q42916511-F434F908-C152-46BD-81B7-25F01A1FA7A6Q44134996-42F7FA7E-2937-4618-B072-7A5600CEB8CEQ47197379-E2035CC1-87CC-4566-BF08-83191C404642Q47894839-9E046802-21BB-41F6-A0B1-23CC334A7C1DQ48314129-45715BFA-8789-4F0A-96F4-1E8749CAE5A9Q53166461-B7E1F3AF-4549-4CAA-8112-A6FCD0553A82Q53239142-DED9B6D0-BD22-4B58-B351-ADC89E9B8923Q54944151-B809AA6C-6229-4121-96C1-2B97339ECC98Q55177986-4FE1D2E8-0FE8-4303-B3A3-6ED89A147355
P2860
Prospective randomized double-blind pilot study of site-specific consensus atlas implementation for rectal cancer target volume delineation in the cooperative group setting.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2010 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
name
Prospective randomized double- ...... the cooperative group setting.
@ast
Prospective randomized double- ...... the cooperative group setting.
@en
Prospective randomized double- ...... the cooperative group setting.
@nl
type
label
Prospective randomized double- ...... the cooperative group setting.
@ast
Prospective randomized double- ...... the cooperative group setting.
@en
Prospective randomized double- ...... the cooperative group setting.
@nl
prefLabel
Prospective randomized double- ...... the cooperative group setting.
@ast
Prospective randomized double- ...... the cooperative group setting.
@en
Prospective randomized double- ...... the cooperative group setting.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P1476
Prospective randomized double- ...... the cooperative group setting.
@en
P2093
Alan W Katz
Anna M Harris
Camille McGann
Carlo G N Demandante
Charles R Thomas
Coen R N Rasch
Daniel Baseman
Daniel T Chang
David T Marshall
Jennifer L Harper
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.IJROBP.2009.11.012
P407
P577
2010-04-18T00:00:00Z