Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.
about
Developments in Screening Tests and Strategies for Colorectal CancerAchieving the best bowel preparation for colonoscopyWhat do people fear about cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of cancer fears in the general populationQuantifying public preferences for different bowel preparation options prior to screening CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment.Public stated preferences and predicted uptake for genome-based colorectal cancer screening.The impact of supplementary narrative-based information on colorectal cancer screening beliefs and intentionFactors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study.A low-volume polyethylene glycol solution was associated with an increased suboptimal bowel preparation rate but had similar recommendations for an early repeat colonoscopy, procedure times, and adenoma detection rates.Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among women in rural central Pennsylvania: primary care physicians' perspective.Estimating an area-level socioeconomic status index and its association with colonoscopy screening adherencePatterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake in newly eligible men and women.Insights in public health: public health perspectives on colorectal cancer screening.Colorectal cancer screening of high-risk populations: A national survey of physicians.The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening.Is discussion of colorectal cancer screening options associated with heightened patient confusion?The association of type and number of chronic diseases with breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.A population-based study of the extent of colorectal cancer screening in men with HIVBarriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer screening in Vietnamese Americans: a qualitative analysis.Predictors of colonoscopy use one year after colonoscopy: prospective study of surveillance behavior for colorectal cancer.Underuse of surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancerAffective science perspectives on cancer control: strategically crafting a mutually beneficial research agendaUnderstanding Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Kentucky.Microbiota-based model improves the sensitivity of fecal immunochemical test for detecting colonic lesionsFactors associated with delayed patient appraisal of colorectal cancer symptoms.What Do Men Want from a Health Screening Mobile App? A Qualitative Study.Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data.Beyond Adherence: Health Care Disparities and the Struggle to Get Screened for Colon Cancer.Crafting Appealing Text Messages to Encourage Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Completion: A Qualitative Study.Gastroenterologists' perceived barriers to optimal pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation: results of a national surveyPsychological Barriers and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A French Qualitative StudyAmerican Indian perceptions of colorectal cancer screening: viewpoints from adults under age 50.Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.Increasing colon cancer screening in primary care among African Americans.Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: a conceptual framework to guide research.More Than Just Accuracy: A Novel Method to Incorporate Multiple Test Attributes in Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Including Point of Care Tests.Unwillingness to participate in colorectal cancer screening: examining fears, attitudes, and medical mistrust in an ethnically diverse sample of adults 50 years and older.Laypersons' views of material incentives for enhancing colorectal cancer screening.Integrating men's health and masculinity theories to explain colorectal cancer screening behavior.Factorial validity and invariance of four psychosocial constructs of colorectal cancer screening: does screening experience matter?DNA from fecal immunochemical test can replace stool for detection of colonic lesions using a microbiota-based model
P2860
Q26778581-FF547233-C211-4B5E-A0B8-DD9800B7AB05Q27028024-1397237D-196E-4157-BA85-17B5307156D6Q30245230-F1F8A496-C777-4340-99B7-24C63C1E8548Q30576161-61D7BCBA-00F5-4B82-B3D3-10A76FAD06A6Q30577041-9508DE09-B5AD-4FD1-8B51-2B2DF4F78ABEQ30640156-74895FE7-C065-47E8-BCCF-BFFBD33FDD77Q30653993-4D45FD46-87A8-4855-9149-2A6A1AF34E2FQ33610747-85001129-8162-42DE-90E3-882E84EEBF24Q33728706-C2F29C3A-7782-42FB-8966-588AE36BCFCCQ33778827-2F1965E5-4466-4196-A427-07FB5E1DD4FFQ33848136-F04AADF1-5FE5-4B0B-BC12-EF90DD8FD483Q33908335-6783A642-CD34-4281-B416-E09DA03E733AQ34137951-5D0229AE-20C4-4AA3-950C-DED8F77F8195Q34160358-82F566DC-2215-4AF2-9A35-0A8DD91C7B88Q34292879-C6CB472E-7A93-435C-9E67-A13168751F66Q34755647-26702CF8-B474-4A43-A611-C9BB3C53A891Q35052601-1732FBB6-F0E5-4128-B92D-133933143733Q35101340-961E3355-080A-452B-986D-43237D1CB2F3Q35136258-56478144-ADFD-4D2D-B13F-B0FA8F0B27A1Q35577838-F18F7B38-B7EF-4F97-BEB2-7BD4EE419319Q35627906-4E896D45-F35A-4B98-9187-F99E48981CB3Q35758744-E5BE6AB4-A132-437C-B74C-4031FDF2B500Q35983252-DFC4E899-E6BC-4B08-BFC0-613BB1386E65Q36159057-7DB48662-AF80-4769-B5C0-F9A85F5CFD33Q36242923-3E572190-8C25-4399-84ED-C41FB2DDC75EQ36372543-E64AD98D-A053-4689-B54F-F03188ADC210Q36386254-F02E14D2-0D72-4D85-9AC6-24E24A4D215BQ36441083-C0389621-436E-4C25-AC69-9BDE58065881Q36573844-1F3E4E3B-5415-4C36-9262-CA3E0B0C369AQ36622707-80FE3D3F-3C50-4276-8AC8-43A53EB63C51Q36632561-9C700D5B-AC8B-400E-92D9-6E1182FB3D1BQ36646541-47A221A7-D73A-4925-A1C0-B20575A15647Q36754895-887C7CFF-269F-4800-815B-6B8F4C935B51Q37130477-8DE5D761-C8C9-453A-B9B6-C2B8382A94A9Q37193879-1CFD8712-BE73-403A-A481-55D0F2B9E8D1Q37252467-399D1BA1-FA51-48F3-8BD9-90CFD478EDB2Q37333638-CC18B89A-679B-46E8-A309-80830AC2DACBQ37360846-148D14E6-AD80-4EEB-800A-BC4CF0FEDE5AQ37381436-6699C602-C87C-4595-B25A-889E922E7DCBQ37414675-3EE4B901-BAEE-44B4-A6EB-872E3B33446B
P2860
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2010 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
name
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.
@ast
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.
@en
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.
@nl
type
label
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.
@ast
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.
@en
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.
@nl
prefLabel
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.
@ast
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.
@en
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.
@en
P2093
Anton J Kuzel
Kelly J Devers
Resa M Jones
Steven H Woolf
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2010.01.021
P577
2010-05-01T00:00:00Z