Variability among institutional review boards' decisions within the context of a multicenter trial.
about
Easy-to-read informed consent forms for hematopoietic cell transplantation clinical trialsEthical considerations of research policy for personal genome analysis: the approach of the Genome Science Project in JapanAccelerating regulatory progress in multi-institutional researchParticipant-Centric Initiatives: Tools to Facilitate Engagement In ResearchEmerging issues in paediatric health research consent forms in Canada: working towards best practicesThose Responsible for Approving Research Studies Have Poor Knowledge of Research Study Design: a Knowledge Assessment of Institutional Review Board Members.Ethical and logistical considerations of multicenter parental bereavement researchApplying research ethics guidelines: the view from a sub-saharan research ethics committee.A survey of the SWISS researchers on the impact of sibling privacy protections on pedigree recruitment.Human subjects protection issues in QUERI implementation research: QUERI SeriesHow good does the science have to be in proposals submitted to Institutional Review Boards? An interview study of Institutional Review Board personnel.The structure and function of research ethics committees in Africa: a case study.Ethical considerations in the collection of genetic data from critically ill patients: what do published studies reveal about potential directions for empirical ethics research?Ethics review as a component of institutional approval for a multicentre continuous quality improvement project: the investigator's perspective.Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking.Industry-sponsored pharmaceutical trials and research ethics boards: are they cloaked in too much secrecy?Institutional review board barriers and solutions encountered in the Collaboration Among Pharmacists and Physicians to Improve Outcomes Now Study: a national multicenter practice-based implementation trial.Research risk for persons with psychiatric disorders: a decisional framework to meet the ethical challenge.Variation among institutional review boards in evaluating the design of a multicenter randomized trialHow variability in the institutional review board review process affects minimal-risk multisite health services research.Variations among Institutional Review Board reviews in a multisite health services research study.Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way?Institutional variability in a minimal risk, population-based study: recognizing policy barriers to health services research.Is your ethics committee efficient? Using "IRB Metrics" as a self-assessment tool for continuous improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, ThailandPractice-based research network studies in the age of HIPAA.Human subjects issues and IRB review in practice-based research.Are central institutional review boards the solution? The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group's report on optimizing the IRB process.Randomized trials in vulnerable populations.Variability in institutional review board assessment of minimal-risk research.Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services researchSurrogate receptivity to participation in critical illness genetic research: aligning research oversight and stakeholder concerns.Informed consent in genomics and genetic research.Protecting vulnerable research subjects in critical care trials: enhancing the informed consent process and recommendations for safeguards.A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learnProtecting subjects with decisional impairment in research: the need for a multifaceted approach.Bench-to-bedside review: human subjects research--are more standards needed?Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: stakeholder perspectivesEvaluation of clinical innovation: a gray zone in the ethics of modern clinical practice?Confronting the Ethical Conduct of Resuscitation Research: a consensus opinion.Use of altered informed consent in pragmatic clinical research.
P2860
Q27014760-F7E5864C-C1BF-445C-AA99-C6812CD9150EQ28607430-2CDE101E-85A9-4AEC-B6E4-3D637719C918Q28651738-970FA5E0-E48A-4411-A526-EB6FBE009B81Q28658381-9EE96AB2-807C-40F9-B824-90AC3098BF1DQ28708977-F65EAB1F-6936-430C-93E4-B375891977C2Q30278493-07AF70D8-981F-44E9-9B05-09215F92ED35Q30428347-FFF1A898-AF43-4C6E-BAF4-3177C827B360Q30431359-12C6B3B3-AB8F-4CEC-878F-47AB0C50DCD6Q30436684-B6314AD7-1A33-4822-B69C-27A0F88BEFC2Q30481583-0352CE16-3474-43C0-A331-62D182DB8CAAQ30571254-9C9172FC-2D34-46CA-A673-DD12A0A1A123Q33270364-0A1B83EE-81C5-4533-850D-2BDFCBB83279Q33517601-DE781E3E-EAE2-4B2C-8AF8-A92EE8507D12Q33645906-E1DEDFF8-C557-406B-8A8E-56542018C9A8Q33719347-DD300398-AFF1-4555-88C7-2EAE3D803B74Q33787682-21028A2F-77EF-45FC-84D3-CC8DE24597E7Q33827250-2A21FABC-BD8A-48A2-8F40-187B4705D17EQ33831746-884DC381-1FCB-4427-B186-D4267591E67AQ34076286-A405DC65-4D32-443A-87EF-181C07FAAEF2Q34240492-3754DE18-AE94-428E-9896-5926520176D2Q34337189-1696E733-0442-4640-AA11-D2BB8B0CD592Q34337195-0015DEEB-EB48-400F-BF83-9F998931928EQ34337572-02584F13-26A7-4860-AA91-9CC1B4ECA7C8Q34536109-ACE711A1-5B25-4475-BE34-651D8E64E0DBQ34629624-7F67CCBA-648D-4849-ABC0-6EF9C7495C34Q34629630-EAB54C58-920F-449C-8F55-772ACA0B23D6Q34713422-6AA790C4-A418-4D0F-86ED-412B17EFF426Q34751800-57F65064-E397-42B4-B6E4-E4198D84B1C0Q35013591-69824EA0-DE13-4F63-89B9-D302F45066F3Q35193591-70449C62-1DB6-4FDF-BAAF-E0D8FC29F768Q35298698-7541D8E9-859C-48EC-9AF0-3CE0F4895176Q35551797-D0C3D3A7-A11A-43DC-98CF-115DEBFFF34DQ35574019-20F4B111-A15A-4166-BB2D-5BD77A172649Q35606493-EC1F4360-FF6F-48FA-A4EE-704706AE517FQ35616213-DB5D011C-B0C2-4FBE-B608-3C45890A671BQ35629913-A155826D-168E-4E67-81D9-94E831B54A92Q35649408-F81DB468-2B8D-4754-883D-42545A4753A9Q36293544-09CE3C55-373A-4CCC-B682-69B8FF996984Q36303606-AD35EE3F-9228-469C-8CDD-75ED5F2DE078Q36397913-C1860DF3-DC23-49A5-8F56-92D36EE3FD3F
P2860
Variability among institutional review boards' decisions within the context of a multicenter trial.
description
2001 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2001 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2001 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2001年の論文
@ja
2001年論文
@yue
2001年論文
@zh-hant
2001年論文
@zh-hk
2001年論文
@zh-mo
2001年論文
@zh-tw
2001年论文
@wuu
name
Variability among institutiona ...... ontext of a multicenter trial.
@ast
Variability among institutiona ...... ontext of a multicenter trial.
@en
Variability among institutiona ...... ontext of a multicenter trial.
@nl
type
label
Variability among institutiona ...... ontext of a multicenter trial.
@ast
Variability among institutiona ...... ontext of a multicenter trial.
@en
Variability among institutiona ...... ontext of a multicenter trial.
@nl
prefLabel
Variability among institutiona ...... ontext of a multicenter trial.
@ast
Variability among institutiona ...... ontext of a multicenter trial.
@en
Variability among institutiona ...... ontext of a multicenter trial.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Variability among institutiona ...... ontext of a multicenter trial.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1097/00003246-200102000-00002
P407
P577
2001-02-01T00:00:00Z