Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
about
A critical review of scoring options for clinical measurement tools.Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: quantifying preferences for healthcare through citizens' juriesValuing patients' experiences of healthcare processes: towards broader applications of existing methods.What matters to patients? A systematic review of preferences for medication-associated outcomes in mental disordersAttitudes and acceptance of oral and parenteral HIV preexposure prophylaxis among potential user groups: a multinational studyDepressive symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder as determinants of preference weights for attributes of obstetric care among Ethiopian womenMeasuring preferences for analgesic treatment for cancer pain: how do African-Americans and Whites perform on choice-based conjoint (CBC) analysis experiments?Appropriate disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia: identifying the key behaviours of 'best practice'.Quantifying public preferences for different bowel preparation options prior to screening CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment.Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting.Patient acceptability of larval therapy for leg ulcer treatment: a randomised survey to inform the sample size calculation of a randomised trialInvolving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?When outcome is a balance: methods to measure combined utility for the choice between induction of labour and expectant management in mild risk pregnancy at termWillingness to pay for social health insurance among informal sector workers in Wuhan, China: a contingent valuation studyHow should the impact of different presentations of treatment effects on patient choice be evaluated? A pilot randomized trial.Cost-effectiveness of an intervention to reduce emergency re-admissions to hospital among older patients.Cost effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the debates surrounding decision rules.Patients' preferences for treatment of hepatitis CThe role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany.Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: a mixed methods approach to message developmentConsumer preferences for hearing aid attributes: a comparison of rating and conjoint analysis methodsUsing qualitative methods to inform the trade-off between content validity and consistency in utility assessment: the example of type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's disease.Using a multidimensional unfolding approach to assess multiple sclerosis patient preferences for disease-modifying therapy: a pilot studyRural practice preferences among medical students in Ghana: a discrete choice experimentWhat Matters to Women When Making Decisions About Breast Cancer Chemoprevention?The impact of economic evaluation on quality management in spine surgery.Measuring consumer preference for models of diabetes care delivered by pharmacistsDifferent patient subgroup, different ranking? Which quality indicators do patients find important when choosing a hospital for hip- or knee arthroplasty?Patients' perceptions of the value of current vision: assessment of preference values among patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization--The Submacular Surgery Trials Vision Preference Value Scale: SST Report No. 6Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) with multicriteria decision analyses (MCDA): field testing of the EVIDEM framework for coverage decisions by a public payer in Canada.The use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic review.The willingness of US pediatric dentists to use atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) with their patients: a conjoint analysisAvailability of treatment drives decisions of genetic health professionals about disclosure of incidental findings.The development of a short instrument to identify common unmet needs in older people in general practice.Multinational evidence of the applicability and robustness of discrete choice modeling for deriving EQ-5D-5L health-state values.Adjusting for treatment refusal in rationing decisionsPatient preferences for disease-modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis therapy: a choice-based conjoint analysis.Prioritizing strategies for comprehensive liver cancer control in Asia: a conjoint analysisThe use of research evidence on patient preferences in pharmaceutical coverage decisions and clinical practice guideline development: exploratory study into current state of play and potential barriers.Are Thai MSM willing to take PrEP for HIV prevention? An analysis of attitudes, preferences and acceptance.
P2860
Q26778156-B8DD44DA-7868-495D-AD84-89D4B085FCA7Q26863705-89D6BE51-4B8A-451F-9094-439F702BDB50Q27691635-AD978DD0-EEDB-44A6-8EDE-DFADA0771935Q28080858-20074997-A203-40D4-BB44-F1C7A3EC9C7DQ28478776-DF6CE9B3-F0BB-45A7-A9AB-210487FD06D1Q28484336-B5C0772A-B95D-420E-8DF9-487099795D92Q28659121-AFE86954-60B3-473B-8423-C6D67BFAE64FQ30482151-C8A2EC67-A863-41B4-8E09-0609CFB2F3E5Q30576161-11743DED-0830-4AB4-969F-38EC83D0D746Q30826805-BE7903C8-8210-4FD7-AA01-20034BAC486AQ33256125-0BBCFC03-C249-42B7-AD23-6E1ACEF2CEBBQ33287934-6207911A-DD44-4AD1-8F71-2681FBE5A4FEQ33289914-53B8A042-B080-44C4-AD36-40993AC33504Q33292029-9292CAFE-57D3-4A2C-9CB2-FAFAD1D2216CQ33386824-8D76A7BB-73C4-4E6C-801D-438BAB0F0C77Q33510685-8A2BEE4A-D11C-4F7C-945A-4808DDA8317DQ33606843-1AF5B40A-79EC-4AC6-A206-17F18D6F43ADQ33615461-0CBC9AFD-5F1F-4D20-B581-B8F039B65298Q33618773-A9F0FB38-4F1F-44D1-8AB9-BE162BB0E209Q33625517-47B1ECF2-48BD-447F-88C7-5C0E43CD7E6AQ33695793-47A86237-BCDD-4D65-80CA-F2460DAE8693Q33748839-B40070CF-8491-4668-9DFE-CF25515D2CEDQ33768847-CD026047-F4FD-4C36-8525-64F022C717B1Q33834019-DC3E6D41-9EE7-421B-9B92-7820815C5214Q33910927-276DD593-EF0A-4B01-B3F7-F6D3F406841AQ33971662-4657085B-93E9-4C53-B988-8E9FDCB7FDF5Q34053153-CB3C0D6E-28A9-42E3-B6C6-DDE9542F2C30Q34066120-530AFBE5-92DF-4EA9-9D74-7228C02717A8Q34081875-759237FD-0470-4611-8C31-1EECA2AB75C0Q34086884-CBD99945-CA58-4DFF-B85D-2EEE64C2D760Q34169202-8A8F8EB5-7989-4AAC-8B0B-4E1DC1D25630Q34175423-26EBD00E-E52B-4157-AF19-3A90C15A7528Q34215648-32B11667-10A7-4DBA-AEBE-2659D8BF4A06Q34249537-A21AD354-7A64-416B-ACC9-C71C52FD01F9Q34337683-B2734F55-9ED4-45CA-BA48-E48A3C8235F2Q34421901-047CADBE-8A9C-42F3-9405-3B53481B00FFQ34446128-435BE85A-8407-4056-AFA0-DD40CE131D55Q34461341-A27DDCF2-100C-4427-BDD1-0B240DF9B1F8Q34499510-46032627-D8EA-4B74-A781-CBBDB7B88A80Q34559293-7D75850A-0999-4A4D-A89A-3544BBE6A2A7
P2860
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
description
2001 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2001 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2001 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2001年の論文
@ja
2001年学术文章
@wuu
2001年学术文章
@zh-cn
2001年学术文章
@zh-hans
2001年学术文章
@zh-my
2001年学术文章
@zh-sg
2001年學術文章
@yue
name
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
@ast
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
@en
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
@nl
type
label
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
@ast
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
@en
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
@nl
prefLabel
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
@ast
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
@en
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
@nl
P2093
P31
P1476
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques
@en
P2093
E M Russell
E R van Teijlingen
P577
2001-01-01T00:00:00Z