Performance of different separation methods interfaced in the same MS-reflection TOF detector: a comparison of performance between CE versus HPLC for biomarker analysis.
about
Classical MALDI-MS versus CE-based ESI-MS proteomic profiling in urine for clinical applications.Recent advances in the combination of capillary electrophoresis with mass spectrometry: from element to single-cell analysis.CE-MS for the analysis of intact proteins 2010-2012.Clinical proteomic biomarkers: relevant issues on study design & technical considerations in biomarker development.On-line CE/ESI/MS interfacing: recent developments and applications in proteomics.Recent advances in capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry for clinical proteomic applications.Clinical applications of capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry in biomarker discovery: Focus on Bladder Cancer.Recent developments in capillary and microchip electroseparations of peptides (2011-2013).CE-MS-based proteomics in biomarker discovery and clinical application.Proteomic biomarkers in kidney disease: issues in development and implementation.Epidemiologic design and analysis for proteomic studies: a primer on -omic technologies.Body fluid peptide and protein signatures in diabetic kidney diseases.Proteomic strategies in the search for novel pancreatic cancer biomarkers and drug targets: recent advances and clinical impact.The proteomic landscape of renal tumors.Implementation of CE-MS-identified proteome-based biomarker panels in drug development and patient management.Simultaneous separation and detection of anions and thiophilic cations using capillary-size anion exchange chromatography with suppressed conductivity detection.
P2860
Q31148183-F5EB155A-C93A-4F76-9AB0-9D5331417A9DQ34480649-002EC51B-9ADD-470D-9F07-29C5AAB91738Q34480662-6CC00435-7DC8-420E-9736-01F819716348Q37714579-926909C3-38BA-41A5-841B-93A349F30E32Q38034203-70241193-B738-4D4A-80C1-528A3DF2D63BQ38091336-C7910244-9DBB-42C4-B79A-A9AB6EF990AFQ38130892-628A2BE7-6E1A-47EF-85C6-6DE79821596DQ38164318-19AEB9D5-C1FD-4E8B-BBB0-05A21612FD4EQ38340358-070E41AD-C041-4F99-B329-015070CC46C8Q38341211-42E38EE7-4D95-4FF9-890A-52ACCA77BC8BQ38384848-429F168C-D4BD-487E-B0FE-A4EBD6D0E05AQ38553924-EEB814CA-F04F-40CA-B8C7-87D79EFFD4D2Q38777938-E91A15F9-91E7-469F-A009-9C628FCB36DAQ38803559-5C5023E9-55F0-4A37-8D21-A5A892F32053Q38906256-5360B79D-8A0A-4ABF-BF8F-355F99378959Q47405968-E51927FC-FC75-4A5D-8B84-CA1F8BCC7B0B
P2860
Performance of different separation methods interfaced in the same MS-reflection TOF detector: a comparison of performance between CE versus HPLC for biomarker analysis.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2012 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
name
Performance of different separ ...... s HPLC for biomarker analysis.
@ast
Performance of different separ ...... s HPLC for biomarker analysis.
@en
Performance of different separ ...... s HPLC for biomarker analysis.
@nl
type
label
Performance of different separ ...... s HPLC for biomarker analysis.
@ast
Performance of different separ ...... s HPLC for biomarker analysis.
@en
Performance of different separ ...... s HPLC for biomarker analysis.
@nl
prefLabel
Performance of different separ ...... s HPLC for biomarker analysis.
@ast
Performance of different separ ...... s HPLC for biomarker analysis.
@en
Performance of different separ ...... s HPLC for biomarker analysis.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1433
P1476
Performance of different separ ...... s HPLC for biomarker analysis.
@en
P2093
Julia Franke
Julien Gonzalez
Panagiotis Zerefos
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/ELPS.201100415
P577
2012-02-01T00:00:00Z