Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes.
about
Creating an effective clinical registry for rare diseasesEfficient, quality-assured data capture in operational research through innovative use of open-access technology.Short EpiData course: do participants use the data entry tool two years post-training?Data validation and other strategies for data entry.The Danish National Lymphoma Registry: Coverage and Data QualityA hybrid solution for extracting structured medical information from unstructured data in medical records via a double-reading/entry system.Patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for traumatic or degenerative meniscal tears: comparative prospective cohort study.Patient-reported outcome after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between lateral and posterior approach.The effect on physical performance of a functional assessment and immediate rehabilitation of acutely admitted elderly patients with reduced functional performance: the design of a randomised clinical trial.Sudden Unexpected Death in North Carolina (SUDDEN): methodology review and screening resultsThe effect of posterior and lateral approach on patient-reported outcome measures and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis, undergoing total hip replacement: a randomised controlled trial protocol.Feasibility of 4 patient-reported outcome measures in a registry settingGuideline concordant detection and management of depression among Alaska Native and American Indian people in primary careA comprehensive stroke center patient registry: advantages, limitations, and lessons learnedTranslation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Oxford hip score: Assessed against generic and disease-specific questionnaires.Self-Reported Cognitive Concerns in People With Lower Limb Loss.Knee Arthroscopy Cohort Southern Denmark (KACS): protocol for a prospective cohort study.Do different types of bearings and noise from total hip arthroplasty influence hip-related pain, function, and quality of life postoperatively?Signs of knee osteoarthritis common in 620 patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery for meniscal tear.Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively.Meningococcal carriage in the African meningitis belt.Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications.Association of self-reported cognitive concerns with mobility in people with lower limb loss.Health-related quality of life in patients with high-grade gliomas: a quantitative longitudinal study.Open access tools for quality-assured and efficient data entry in a large, state-wide tobacco survey in India.Cross-Sectional Assessment of Factors Related to Pain Intensity and Pain Interference in Lower Limb Prosthesis Users.CHF-PROM: validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with chronic heart failure.
P2860
Q26741126-4E0622DF-3100-4128-AD26-B950FBD5E1E8Q30488350-824A88DA-6672-4CCB-94E8-7F22FA23F6BCQ30488792-05B3DB0C-26CE-4F94-8F80-9411ED8FB9E8Q30811599-1C7C0A8F-A5EB-4F33-B7EF-EF8D5B4205FDQ31110238-35D2564C-0696-4618-ABF4-A46DEF281C2EQ31125586-5E87ECAB-80CB-413C-B2CE-3398F35B865EQ33647326-62FD89A5-DA5D-4173-A7D7-5A43FB5C39ADQ33697017-B4DB1DA1-C053-4726-AABE-E407B9A03F12Q33795644-FF85313F-22D2-4841-ADA8-E543E5CAE14CQ34304389-8366C914-1131-40C8-BA45-829A662B4156Q34438886-00FF1499-345A-447E-8AD1-27EE2C437299Q36188939-7260D6E2-1A9F-4706-BC76-91ECCC29DE84Q36233896-48905637-3B72-4E5B-BFDD-4D08C32CC26AQ36603914-84B0DE5E-DC71-4082-BF76-25254D2BC90EQ36765513-EA9292B8-50FE-4C87-B93D-BB35EE998CE7Q36945627-E5B288A2-DFDF-4838-9507-06BC1F423004Q37256423-DB6084A1-E255-40C2-83C9-86F05B09A952Q37428892-ED6E1FDD-A126-4DD3-B508-3A9088C954DEQ37597186-27AD77C3-C6D7-4FD7-80C7-5663512EC502Q37614715-0C2DF531-EA9E-4EB2-ADAF-8E821AF9E02DQ37632051-289C971E-71F1-433C-902A-345551CA7BD8Q37693136-F1CF02A8-5F94-4133-B8F4-C04CAA8690B0Q39275537-4F2E6098-295B-4CD6-A844-7C8FB94DAAB5Q41705962-99C00692-D55E-4D85-94C2-855B6E15E1C6Q45157933-65871F2C-D357-4BF5-BCE4-5B03A282952CQ50244331-74B9E93E-5A26-4B09-94E7-EA9A5BCC6913Q52648355-4C8A518E-8E5F-44B7-A9E9-A2EEE37C20AB
P2860
Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2012 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
name
Quality of data entry using si ...... of patient-reported outcomes.
@ast
Quality of data entry using si ...... of patient-reported outcomes.
@en
Quality of data entry using si ...... of patient-reported outcomes.
@nl
type
label
Quality of data entry using si ...... of patient-reported outcomes.
@ast
Quality of data entry using si ...... of patient-reported outcomes.
@en
Quality of data entry using si ...... of patient-reported outcomes.
@nl
prefLabel
Quality of data entry using si ...... of patient-reported outcomes.
@ast
Quality of data entry using si ...... of patient-reported outcomes.
@en
Quality of data entry using si ...... of patient-reported outcomes.
@nl
P2860
P50
P921
P1433
P1476
Quality of data entry using si ...... of patient-reported outcomes.
@en
P2860
P304
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0035087
P407
P577
2012-04-06T00:00:00Z