about
Glucose concentration in capillary blood of dairy cows obtained by a minimally invasive lancet technique and determined with three different hand-held devices.Validity and responsiveness of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing physical activity during pregnancyEvaluation of the Steelex M600H coagulometer prothrombin time-international normalized ratio assay with Steelex test reagents.Reproducibility, accuracy and concordance of Accutrend Plus for measuring circulating lipid concentration in adultsEvaluation of three commercial varicella-zoster virus IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in comparison to the fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antigen testA comparison between two different automated total 25-hydroxyvitamin D immunoassay methods using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.Options to Expand HIV Viral Load Testing in South Africa: Evaluation of the GeneXpert® HIV-1 Viral Load Assay.Comparison of Formulas for Calculating Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in General Population and High-risk Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.Requirement for Appropriate Methodology to Evaluate the Clinical Relevance of the Difference in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentrations Obtained by Different Methods.Preanalytical investigations of phlebotomy: methodological aspects, pitfalls and recommendations.Understanding Bland Altman analysis.Development and Validation of a High-Throughput Mass Spectrometry Based Urine Metabolomic Test for the Detection of Colonic Adenomatous PolypsComparison of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for cerebrospinal fluid measurement of amyloid β1-42 and total tau.Low perfusion index affects the difference in glucose level between capillary and venous bloodAmmonium and arsenic trioxide are potent facilitators of oligonucleotide function when delivered by gymnosis.Reappraisal of the reliability of Doppler echocardiographic estimations for mean pulmonary artery pressure in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a study from a tertiary centre comparing four formulae.Verification of a novel point-of-care HbA1c device in real world clinical practice by comparison to three high performance liquid chromatography instruments.Comparison of Four Automated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Immunoassays: ADVIA Centaur XP, ARCHITECT I2000sr, Elecsys E170, and Unicel Dxi800.Computed exercise plasma lactate concentrations: A conversion formula.Risk analysis and assessment based on Sigma metrics and intended use.Evaluation of the analytical performances of the Cobas c513 analyser for HbA assay
P2860
Q30390349-5B855FE4-33CD-4A63-A7F3-774928D5A950Q33731899-6111B75D-0DD8-456F-849A-062AD09AB5A6Q33773117-D8E27D2C-D25E-4B39-A092-1EED13A68623Q33773174-36D9C6F6-567F-4A64-B8FD-3A28A3204013Q36154756-64F2B934-DC57-4B5D-BBE1-ADCD653F4B4BQ36211916-C7FBBAB3-90E0-4E17-BD89-96EB42DC9111Q36228238-66E9BB88-387D-402E-815F-0A57E49789FBQ37318528-184231CA-4819-48C6-B0DC-F8B8BE0E52E4Q37639139-9B6FD895-827F-4FC7-8E40-209B75C21217Q37739745-BAC7507F-C8C9-4B3F-BA44-EFED49022F62Q38537567-6AD013ED-7C04-448C-8BD2-2AAC3EAD2495Q41666769-51B73019-BCFD-4ADD-94AD-22FF222CA486Q41788413-555D2D63-6A36-40FC-8646-144EC36C6A02Q41789014-E4DFD9F0-402A-4468-B238-90E7E7463A3AQ52664595-8E48F69D-D147-4DF3-B5E3-D73ECEE075E1Q53272503-822FA0ED-9A73-4C1C-AEAF-2DDA39FB8B3EQ55290503-F216FD64-380C-4B1A-8EB8-55D56EAFB7A8Q55371382-1F6965B7-914E-433B-9FA1-EE1E4F9C41C3Q55496653-0FE00243-586A-4EC0-9EFB-1F27346AA38AQ55690218-189A07BF-130C-4FD2-B4CC-51904FF1195AQ59133703-A0109544-EE45-4980-BB28-8E423318B99B
P2860
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.
@ast
Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.
@en
Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.
@nl
type
label
Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.
@ast
Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.
@en
Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.
@ast
Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.
@en
Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.
@nl
P356
P1433
P1476
Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression
@en
P2093
Lidija Bilić-Zulle
P356
10.11613/BM.2011.010
P577
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z