When experts disagree (and better science won't help much): using structured deliberations to support endangered species recovery planning.
about
Comparing multi-criteria decision analysis and integrated assessment to support long-term water supply planning.Structuring decisions for managing threatened and endangered species in a changing climate.Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation.Connecting Earth observation to high-throughput biodiversity dataMapping the integrative field: taking stock of socio-technical collaborations
P2860
When experts disagree (and better science won't help much): using structured deliberations to support endangered species recovery planning.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2012 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
name
When experts disagree (and bet ...... red species recovery planning.
@ast
When experts disagree (and bet ...... red species recovery planning.
@en
When experts disagree
@nl
type
label
When experts disagree (and bet ...... red species recovery planning.
@ast
When experts disagree (and bet ...... red species recovery planning.
@en
When experts disagree
@nl
prefLabel
When experts disagree (and bet ...... red species recovery planning.
@ast
When experts disagree (and bet ...... red species recovery planning.
@en
When experts disagree
@nl
P2093
P1476
When experts disagree (and bet ...... red species recovery planning.
@en
P2093
Graham Long
James G Geiger
Mary Colligan
Melissa Laser
Robin Gregory
P356
10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2012.03.001
P577
2012-04-18T00:00:00Z