Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
about
Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery: Current State and Future PerspectiveIdiopathic scoliosis in children and adolescents: assessment with a biplanar X-ray deviceAssessment of the axial rotation of the pelvis with the EOS® imaging system: intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and accuracy study.Patient-specific 3D models created by 3D imaging system or bi-planar imaging coupled with Moiré-Fringe projections: a comparative study of accuracy and reliability on spinal curvatures and vertebral rotation data.Anterior Overgrowth in Primary Curves, Compensatory Curves and Junctional Segments in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.Maintenance of Derotation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: a Novel Technique Measuring Postoperative Vertebral Rotation by Pedicle Screw Position.EOS imaging versus current radiography: A health technology assessment study.Three dimensional analysis of brace biomechanical efficacy for patients with AIS.Prognostic Value of Bone Mineral Density on Curve Progression: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of 513 Girls with Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisRadiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT- IRSSD "John Sevastic Award" Winner in Imaging Research.Semiautomated 3D Spine Reconstruction from Biplanar Radiographic Images: Prediction of Intervertebral Loading in Scoliotic Subjects.A comprehensive review of thoracic deformity parameters in scoliosis.EOS(®) biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations.Low-dose biplanar skeletal survey versus digital skeletal survey in multiple myeloma.The Height-Width-Depth Ratios of the Intervertebral Discs and Vertebral Bodies in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis vs Controls in a Chinese Population.Upright, prone, and supine spinal morphology and alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosisGeometric sensitivity of patient-specific finite element models of the spine to variability in user-selected anatomical landmarks.The use of a photogrammetric method for the three-dimensional evaluation of spinal correction in scoliosis.Imaging in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Children with Idiopathic Scoliosis.Whole spine CT for evaluation of scoliosis in children: feasibility of sub-milliSievert scanning protocol.Characterizing the differences between the 2D and 3D measurements of spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.The effects of the three-dimensional deformity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on pulmonary function.Bi-planar spinal stereoradiography of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: considerations in 3D alignment and functional balance.
P2860
Q26771334-9379F713-D651-4E19-A065-0221840FE211Q34332799-789E22BC-F2E6-4A84-88DC-6660539ED84EQ34940248-D11AE73B-161C-4155-91D9-122325197E42Q36057171-D7402141-D012-40AC-8235-406BC2C5252AQ36088795-78E97009-8DF6-4BE1-823F-AA6C1BC949B6Q36523024-4F02CB1F-6725-4FDE-BE10-027C77E06329Q36983302-B4397E64-71F0-4DBE-AF36-B197D2F1A2E1Q37456469-12772F9C-0B28-4B12-ABBF-15496BFB94DCQ37518542-56305B92-7E99-4A90-A172-E5DCAA6E94E2Q37543453-5EBBBACC-9492-4B9C-A41D-EF4402AF0302Q37595057-B86F07FC-2435-47AA-83CD-763B053FCB9BQ38252664-EEEF0001-A7BA-482E-8473-2E09034D0276Q38592829-B3A66354-1002-4643-A97F-5F2F8BD7EDA3Q40099406-BC70DAA7-F3FB-42B4-B3A9-608F927BD4B3Q42120773-DCEE6C56-1DC4-42B1-8288-6E4FEB5A17E2Q42210538-7CEE1960-89E2-4149-AAE3-2234AEB515C0Q44776198-39E6B001-10A3-4C2F-9E9C-A892E676AFDDQ48044658-1762CC4B-0FF8-4640-BB0E-CCF8F13E5CACQ49240618-7F2FA57A-FFAC-48A3-A7CC-C66BC892A23EQ53133638-A01A260E-669C-4C20-AB69-ECBF239C97D7Q53698799-8E65ADAB-5A3C-42F5-91DF-266480477F92Q53843465-5A9E0222-C220-429A-99D6-F9EE18E6EA37Q54009613-81D42ED2-4739-4419-9747-473D2E13D24F
P2860
Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012 թուականի Յուլիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2012 թվականի հուլիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
name
Comparison of 3-dimensional sp ...... OS versus computed tomography.
@ast
Comparison of 3-dimensional sp ...... OS versus computed tomography.
@en
Comparison of 3-dimensional sp ...... OS versus computed tomography.
@nl
type
label
Comparison of 3-dimensional sp ...... OS versus computed tomography.
@ast
Comparison of 3-dimensional sp ...... OS versus computed tomography.
@en
Comparison of 3-dimensional sp ...... OS versus computed tomography.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of 3-dimensional sp ...... OS versus computed tomography.
@ast
Comparison of 3-dimensional sp ...... OS versus computed tomography.
@en
Comparison of 3-dimensional sp ...... OS versus computed tomography.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Comparison of 3-dimensional sp ...... OS versus computed tomography.
@en
P2093
Diana A Glaser
Peter O Newton
P304
P356
10.1097/BRS.0B013E3182518A15
P407
P577
2012-07-01T00:00:00Z