Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?
about
Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in womenMeasuring outcomes in urogynecological surgery: "perspective is everything"The Design of a Randomized Trial of Vaginal Surgery for Uterovaginal Prolapse: Vaginal Hysterectomy With Native Tissue Vault Suspension Versus Mesh Hysteropexy Suspension (The Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial)Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.Transischioanal trans-sacrospinous ligament rectocele repair with polypropylene mesh: a prospective study with assessment of rectoanal function.
P2860
Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2010 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
name
Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?
@ast
Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?
@en
Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?
@nl
type
label
Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?
@ast
Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?
@en
Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?
@nl
prefLabel
Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?
@ast
Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?
@en
Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?
@en
P2093
Anthony Visco
Cathie Spino
Charlie W Nager
Edward Varner
Ingrid Nygaard
Joseph Schaffer
Matthew D Barber
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Susan Meikle
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.AJOG.2010.06.071
P407
P577
2010-08-21T00:00:00Z