Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics.
about
New advances of preimplantation and prenatal genetic screening and noninvasive testing as a potential predictor of health status of babiesClinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic reviewEmbryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoringNon-invasive methods for embryo selectionAre there optimal numbers of oocytes, spermatozoa and embryos in assisted reproduction?Relative kinetic expressions defining cleavage synchronicity are better predictors of blastocyst formation and quality than absolute time points.Prediction model for aneuploidy in early human embryo development revealed by single-cell analysisInter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations.Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trialsAnalysis of embryo morphokinetics, multinucleation and cleavage anomalies using continuous time-lapse monitoring in blastocyst transfer cycles.Selection of competent blastocysts for transfer by combining time-lapse monitoring and array CGH testing for patients undergoing preimplantation genetic screening: a prospective study with sibling oocytesAssessing morphokinetic parameters via time lapse microscopy (TLM) to predict euploidy: are aneuploidy risk classification models universal?Abnormal early cleavage events predict early embryo demise: sperm oxidative stress and early abnormal cleavage.Morphokinetic analysis of cleavage stage embryos and its relationship to aneuploidy in a retrospective time-lapse imaging study.Using the Eeva Test™ adjunctively to traditional day 3 morphology is informative for consistent embryo assessment within a panel of embryologists with diverse experienceA quantitative approach to blastocyst quality evaluation: morphometric analysis and related IVF outcomes.Aneuploidy rates and blastocyst formation after biopsy of morulae and early blastocysts on day 5.Time-Lapse Video Microscopy for Assessment of EYFP-Parkin Aggregation as a Marker for Cellular Mitophagy.Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: a blinded, multi-centre studyThe impact of paternal factors on cleavage stage and blastocyst development analyzed by time-lapse imaging-a retrospective observational studySelecting embryos with the highest implantation potential using data mining and decision tree based on classical embryo morphology and morphokinetics.Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo originTime-lapse variables and embryo gender: a retrospective analysis of 81 live births obtained following minimal stimulation and single embryo transfer.Morphokinetic behavior of euploid and aneuploid embryos analyzed by time-lapse in embryoscope.Could time-lapse embryo imaging reduce the need for biopsy and PGS?Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3Polarity and cell division orientation in the cleavage embryo: from worm to human.Pronuclear morphology evaluation for fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles: a systematic review.Morphokinetic Characteristics and Developmental Potential of In Vitro Cultured Embryos from Natural Cycles in Patients with Poor Ovarian ResponseA simple and rapid flow cytometry-based assay to identify a competent embryo prior to embryo transferDiagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability.Collapse of blastocysts is strongly related to lower implantation success: a time-lapse study.Mammalian pre-implantation chromosomal instability: species comparison, evolutionary considerations, and pathological correlations.Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryo.Successful Implantation from the Embryonic Aspect.Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.Association between growth dynamics, morphological parameters, the chromosomal status of the blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer.Assessment of human embryo development using morphological criteria in an era of time-lapse, algorithms and 'OMICS': is looking good still important?Comparison of the morphokinetic parameters of embryos according to ovarian reserve in IVF cycles.Vertebrate Embryonic Cleavage Pattern Determination.
P2860
Q26822531-F2C57CD8-8A14-409F-A1A9-F4C1D1BCD68FQ26827106-88067666-4643-49FE-9F35-1DB43B828D22Q26995448-5BDB871D-70F9-48F7-B2AE-CE57C8C0DB30Q28067249-C61FAA48-4781-4855-9027-139B8F5F51ECQ28077711-04505FCE-03A0-4745-8434-2103CD6B4845Q30615610-40AAD8D4-8C74-4ECF-B92A-48751DD7F5DAQ30658086-B9C925CE-2A0F-4FA9-9D1E-CA24E11E49F3Q31140293-C68D79A6-80A9-46EC-B977-CB1416EBC5DCQ33752021-6AFE9803-79B3-4AD8-992A-CCF4BC82AF07Q33820389-C2E6335B-A35A-41AF-8BED-ABA9B3F7F605Q33830129-2FB6F7D3-6434-4C7F-9711-DFEB7BA65A0DQ34145778-60F25B7E-4D5D-4EA6-86CA-FFE5FE131BB2Q34326058-6A65B373-15D6-4FEB-9A3C-2BB74801D4E0Q34962670-2243D52E-DA37-42B9-BF65-E6A7261DF0D8Q34962700-5C5E050B-E073-41E9-B740-EF1204F7B5BDQ35599502-30B66C00-28B6-43A7-9B32-5974A352C964Q35816156-B96A5129-9991-4721-AAEE-7BB387A6806BQ36014614-BA27F07E-9BB7-4854-B5B5-937D6EB6E124Q36073972-C0657878-1830-4E91-AD2D-A6AE1FFE0BAAQ36297186-1F3F5FDD-D84F-40B1-8ECE-5CBC1626CE53Q36390301-9085ED63-9987-46EE-A24A-13876CF025E5Q36473758-D1D34781-B963-4E7F-AB30-89BD68F7290AQ36910199-73210FA1-8C14-45A8-BBCD-A1AF6F1F4704Q37024903-461C373B-6E31-47A4-90DB-B5F97482E355Q37214109-1E644D74-E334-4FDA-A4A6-D44BED0D1967Q37265390-DE67377B-3C07-403A-836C-E42CE8A0B01EQ37335323-470F5F2B-4016-41FA-9C8C-49B21692CC2DQ37357642-C82DB0DA-3FDA-46EC-8DBE-EE6DA3DCEB08Q37549498-823B9CD7-6890-44B6-AB5D-68A3DD32765EQ37563302-44BFD16B-5E00-4BF0-95E6-F424213A36BFQ38310795-55C12498-2A98-4FC8-8464-7C51AA796FC0Q38412208-2698D55A-0A5E-41D2-B376-C0D3F9128362Q38586272-E1465EC7-3972-4620-80DE-14B6E604CC54Q38602021-851A1EB4-6AB3-4DDA-A07B-F988E83DF4CEQ38629529-649D71AF-52C5-4862-993D-BE49AEF4D72BQ38641797-48D16D00-37C3-47F0-8E12-09E5AD4E7755Q38754987-85CCD8B7-5E86-4E99-B98A-34E371375B58Q38826065-D9273AB8-A734-401B-86C7-CE25B63A59CCQ38835283-D8FD7AE1-C647-4558-8C3F-9FE281A8E710Q39038816-2F7B5549-2E43-4C65-A4D9-A3E3D492268F
P2860
Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2013 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
name
Modelling a risk classificatio ...... g non-invasive morphokinetics.
@ast
Modelling a risk classificatio ...... g non-invasive morphokinetics.
@en
Modelling a risk classificatio ...... g non-invasive morphokinetics.
@nl
type
label
Modelling a risk classificatio ...... g non-invasive morphokinetics.
@ast
Modelling a risk classificatio ...... g non-invasive morphokinetics.
@en
Modelling a risk classificatio ...... g non-invasive morphokinetics.
@nl
prefLabel
Modelling a risk classificatio ...... g non-invasive morphokinetics.
@ast
Modelling a risk classificatio ...... g non-invasive morphokinetics.
@en
Modelling a risk classificatio ...... g non-invasive morphokinetics.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Modelling a risk classificatio ...... g non-invasive morphokinetics.
@en
P2093
Alison Campbell
Cristina Fontes Lindemann Hickman
Mark Sedler
Natalie Bowman
Samantha Duffy
Simon Fishel
P304
P356
10.1016/J.RBMO.2013.02.006
P577
2013-02-19T00:00:00Z