What should an ideal spinal injury classification system consist of? A methodological review and conceptual proposal for future classifications
about
Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Injury Severity Score System: A Literature Review of Its SafetyAO spine injury classification system: a revision proposal for the thoracic and lumbar spineThe Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Condylar Process Fractures - Level 3 Tutorial.Detecting Facet Joint and Lateral Mass Injuries of the Subaxial Cervical Spine in Major Trauma Patients.The precision, accuracy and validity of detecting posterior ligamentous complex injuries of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a critical appraisal of the literatureThe Edwin Smith papyrus: a clinical reappraisal of the oldest known document on spinal injuries.The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2010.The First AO Classification System for Fractures of the Craniomaxillofacial Skeleton: Rationale, Methodological Background, Developmental Process, and ObjectivesAn evidence-based approach towards the cranio-cervical junction injury classifications.Definitions of traumatic conus medullaris and cauda equina syndrome: a systematic literature review.Reliability assessment of AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system and Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) for thoracolumbar spine injuries: results of a multicentre study.Do we have an ideal classification system for thoracolumbar and subaxial cervical spine injuries: what is the expert's perspective?Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by Chinese spinal surgeons.AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system.
P2860
Q26770360-2F9764EC-DF13-4118-91A4-95C1625D9C6DQ27007702-64595977-190E-422F-BE83-C25EEE5E8208Q34610440-CCBB3BF0-920F-4057-94B2-50621C865255Q35756446-F1144449-4CCE-4B42-B687-914918318223Q36648516-22CF6D57-9304-4474-BC7D-F3ED4731AB61Q37779028-CB6805A0-81EE-4A35-9BE8-DDF3E9EC5A51Q37830383-45785EFD-A30C-41BB-8AFE-5820B19F1BBDQ38285663-6EDD5E56-25EF-4F17-967F-45E7385899B4Q38386524-85D8F976-8135-428E-9C52-7B9FCE5A8F9EQ38769442-60314615-9E8A-42F5-B97C-BFE69A481C40Q39662195-0074A293-0C5C-44B4-BADD-058702E0935AQ53081815-6EDB52FC-879F-4A88-B8AE-3CECC3C9E739Q53223296-7F22FDB8-941C-41D0-BB7C-42886A78A82FQ53233023-56D588B6-01F6-4E14-BAA0-DDD2C4DEA2E4
P2860
What should an ideal spinal injury classification system consist of? A methodological review and conceptual proposal for future classifications
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2010 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
name
What should an ideal spinal in ...... sal for future classifications
@ast
What should an ideal spinal in ...... sal for future classifications
@en
What should an ideal spinal in ...... sal for future classifications
@nl
type
label
What should an ideal spinal in ...... sal for future classifications
@ast
What should an ideal spinal in ...... sal for future classifications
@en
What should an ideal spinal in ...... sal for future classifications
@nl
prefLabel
What should an ideal spinal in ...... sal for future classifications
@ast
What should an ideal spinal in ...... sal for future classifications
@en
What should an ideal spinal in ...... sal for future classifications
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
What should an ideal spinal in ...... sal for future classifications
@en
P2093
Allard J F Hosman
Beate Hanson
Jens R Chapman
Joost J van Middendorp
Laurent Audigé
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00586-010-1415-9
P577
2010-05-13T00:00:00Z