Evaluating the evidence for evidence-based medicine: are randomized clinical trials less flawed than other forms of peer-reviewed medical research?
about
Evaluating the evidence for evidence-based medicine: are randomized clinical trials less flawed than other forms of peer-reviewed medical research?
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2013 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
name
Evaluating the evidence for ev ...... eer-reviewed medical research?
@ast
Evaluating the evidence for ev ...... eer-reviewed medical research?
@en
Evaluating the evidence for ev ...... eer-reviewed medical research?
@nl
type
label
Evaluating the evidence for ev ...... eer-reviewed medical research?
@ast
Evaluating the evidence for ev ...... eer-reviewed medical research?
@en
Evaluating the evidence for ev ...... eer-reviewed medical research?
@nl
prefLabel
Evaluating the evidence for ev ...... eer-reviewed medical research?
@ast
Evaluating the evidence for ev ...... eer-reviewed medical research?
@en
Evaluating the evidence for ev ...... eer-reviewed medical research?
@nl
P356
P1433
P1476
Evaluating the evidence for ev ...... eer-reviewed medical research?
@en
P2093
R Grant Steen
P304
P356
10.1096/FJ.13-230714
P407
P577
2013-05-21T00:00:00Z