Is consumer response to plain/standardised tobacco packaging consistent with framework convention on tobacco control guidelines? A systematic review of quantitative studies.
about
Tobacco packaging design for preventing tobacco uptakeTobacco packaging design for preventing tobacco uptakeTobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco usePerceptions and impact of plain packaging of tobacco products in low and middle income countries, middle to upper income countries and low-income settings in high-income countries: a systematic review of the literaturePlain packaging of cigarettes: do we have sufficient evidence?Cute as candy: a qualitative study of perceptions of snus branding and package design among youth in Norway.Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use.Impact of Australia's introduction of tobacco plain packs on adult smokers' pack-related perceptions and responses: results from a continuous tracking survey.Are young people's beliefs about menthol cigarettes associated with smoking-related intentions and behaviors?Plain cigarette packs do not exert Pavlovian to instrumental transfer of control over tobacco-seeking.Personal pack display and active smoking at outdoor café strips: assessing the impact of plain packaging 1 year postimplementation.Are quitting-related cognitions and behaviours predicted by proximal responses to plain packaging with larger health warnings? Findings from a national cohort study with Australian adult smokersAustralian adult smokers' responses to plain packaging with larger graphic health warnings 1 year after implementation: results from a national cross-sectional tracking survey.Do larger graphic health warnings on standardised cigarette packs increase adolescents' cognitive processing of consumer health information and beliefs about smoking-related harms?Has the introduction of plain packaging with larger graphic health warnings changed adolescents' perceptions of cigarette packs and brands?The impact of the 2009/2010 enhancement of cigarette health warning labels in Uruguay: longitudinal findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Uruguay SurveyComplying with the framework convention for tobacco control: an application of the Abridged SimSmoke model to Israel.Over-Time Impacts of Pictorial Health Warning Labels and their Differences across Smoker Subgroups: Results from Adult Smokers in Canada and Australia.Global tobacco prevention and control in relation to a cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention framework: A narrative review.The influence of threatening visual warnings on tobacco packaging: Measuring the impact of threat level, image size, and type of pack through psychophysiological and self-report methods.Packaging colour research by tobacco companies: the pack as a product characteristic.Projecting the future smoking prevalence in Norway.The Impact of Implementing Tobacco Control Policies: The 2017 Tobacco Control Policy Scorecard.Smoke signals: The decline of brand identity predicts reduced smoking behaviour following the introduction of plain packaging.Personal tobacco pack display before and after the introduction of plain packaging with larger pictorial health warnings in Australia: an observational study of outdoor café strips.Commentary on Zacher et al. (2014): Emerging behavioural impact of packaging changes in Australia: time for action elsewhere.Estimating the ‘consumer surplus’ for branded versus standardised tobacco packaging
P2860
Q24186235-F3E54B5F-1055-424C-A193-05B94259840CQ24194642-7434326F-C857-4D93-9470-154D810F7ECAQ24194648-4259F96E-AE1A-4186-8EA2-A5407274BCB7Q28070582-B10A4398-7E13-467C-8B92-B00834CF36D3Q28083910-2EC10BED-937C-425A-AB41-7AE4C4B09B0BQ33552616-FF007327-A316-4B5C-A024-13190C52C1B1Q34555905-FC20953A-A5EB-4796-9BB2-048C59867104Q34768309-98B4DCD7-AE41-411B-8D42-8BBFB4118FAEQ34974762-D7B4DA7F-0CF0-490E-A205-E47FDCDEF880Q35022203-211D8306-21A6-4238-8242-874B0B3EF7C3Q35350657-352C0DDC-C87E-447B-A2E7-08116B33754EQ35460481-7BC5C7EA-48CB-4A58-9FEC-E5DE3BCCC7FFQ35460496-329CB4BA-34E7-451C-A3C1-99D155B1FB14Q35460515-822BDE82-DE9F-4D46-88B3-6E05A0DA4E36Q35460610-269F4F47-68BD-4411-8176-67EDB4457800Q36200514-BA1D7AE0-5F8D-466A-905F-0855ABE7FD57Q37258258-3538D248-04FD-4E4D-ADCD-23AE85E26913Q38715310-DC274818-0C91-4A56-B688-3C2265655C20Q38975382-42C4824B-6A03-49FD-B73C-8749FEEC3917Q41072587-62853795-254D-436B-A9BC-2086CDBEBB47Q46059380-EE4460EC-757B-4F05-ACB2-DF09943C687DQ48060162-F99310B2-E771-4085-9E35-FA8652CAD9F4Q49926953-DE2B99EC-D8B7-40C2-8C4C-27D97518D5ACQ49931108-BE52A995-7412-45E9-B343-2B6CE82F5351Q52303906-EBBE9236-B92C-4218-9FC8-479FF9745B34Q52304447-A17221BB-A920-43E9-BE0E-3BE4784A36AEQ58477020-240883DC-8FFE-42AC-B31E-C7FEBE22B83B
P2860
Is consumer response to plain/standardised tobacco packaging consistent with framework convention on tobacco control guidelines? A systematic review of quantitative studies.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2013 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
name
Is consumer response to plain/ ...... eview of quantitative studies.
@ast
Is consumer response to plain/ ...... eview of quantitative studies.
@en
Is consumer response to plain/ ...... eview of quantitative studies.
@nl
type
label
Is consumer response to plain/ ...... eview of quantitative studies.
@ast
Is consumer response to plain/ ...... eview of quantitative studies.
@en
Is consumer response to plain/ ...... eview of quantitative studies.
@nl
prefLabel
Is consumer response to plain/ ...... eview of quantitative studies.
@ast
Is consumer response to plain/ ...... eview of quantitative studies.
@en
Is consumer response to plain/ ...... eview of quantitative studies.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P1433
P1476
Is consumer response to plain/ ...... review of quantitative studies
@en
P2093
Gerard Hastings
Irene Kwan
James Thomas
Kate Hinds
Kathryn Angus
Linda Bauld
Martine Stead
Richard I Purves
Stuart L Bryce
P2860
P304
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0075919
P407
P577
2013-10-16T00:00:00Z