Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.
about
A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care.Quality of pharmaceutical care in surgical patientsDesign of a continuous quality improvement program to prevent falls among community-dwelling older adults in an integrated healthcare system.The minimum data set prevalence of restraint quality indicator: does it reflect differences in care?Selecting process quality indicators for the integrated care of vulnerable older adults affected by cognitive impairment or dementiaDoes delayed measurement affect patient reports of provider performance? Implications for performance measurement of medical assistance with tobacco cessation: a Dental PBRN study.Methodology for developing quality indicators for the care of older people in the Emergency Department.Evaluation of the quality of antenatal care using electronic health record information in family medicine clinics of Mexico CityQuality of care and health-related quality of life of climacteric stage women cared for in family medicine clinics in MexicoMeasuring the quality of care provided to community dwelling vulnerable elders dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid.Validity versus feasibility for quality of care indicators: expert panel results from the MI-Plus study.Does screening for pain correspond to high quality care for veterans?Development of quality indicators for monitoring outcomes of frail elderly hospitalised in acute care health settings: study protocol.Assessing quality of care of elderly patients using the ACOVE quality indicator set: a systematic reviewQuality and safety of medication use in primary care: consensus validation of a new set of explicit medication assessment criteria and prioritisation of topics for improvement.Evaluating quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes using electronic health record information in Mexico.Relationship of nursing home staffing to quality of careEffect of inpatient quality of care on functional outcomes in patients with hip fracture.Towards a standardized method of developing quality indicators for palliative care: protocol of the Quality indicators for Palliative Care (Q-PAC) study.Research priorities for high-quality geriatric emergency care: medication management, screening, and prevention and functional assessment.Contrasting effects of geriatric versus general medical multimorbidity on quality of ambulatory careQuality of care in one Italian nursing home measured by ACOVE process indicators.Quality indicators for the primary care of osteoarthritis: a systematic review.Quality of care for older persons at the dawn of the third millennium.Face-validation of quality indicators for the organization of palliative care in hospitals in Indonesia: a contribution to quality improvement.Developing quality indicators for older adults: transfer from the USA to the UK is feasible.Development of quality of care indicators for Parkinson's disease.Quality of Co-Prescribing NSAID and Gastroprotective Medications for Elders in The Netherlands and Its Association with the Electronic Medical Record.Quality of care indicators for gout management.Computerized condition-specific templates for improving care of geriatric syndromes in a primary care settingAssociation of patient-centered outcomes with patient-reported and ICD-9-based morbidity measures.[Validation of indicators of the management of cognitive impairment in geriatric assessment units].Effect of Physician Delegation to Other Healthcare Providers on the Quality of Care for Geriatric Conditions.Capitalizing on the teachable moment: osteoarthritis physical activity and exercise net for improving physical activity in early knee osteoarthritisWhen comorbidity, aging, and complexity of primary care meet: development and validation of the Geriatric CompleXity of Care Index.Identification of quality indicators of end-of-life cancer care from medical chart review using a modified Delphi method in Japan.Physician job satisfaction and quality of care among hospital employed physicians in Japan.The association of patient age with cardiovascular disease risk factor treatment and control in diabetes.Quality indicators for geriatric emergency care.From assessment to improvement of elderly care in general practice using decision support to increase adherence to ACOVE quality indicators: study protocol for randomized control trial.
P2860
Q26778303-9D21A9AC-5A67-43AD-B60E-E8D29C3029CCQ28540545-ECC9566B-E9BB-4FEE-A697-76469D6A1FA5Q30491761-E9A69AE1-E5FA-4094-9AB2-2AA09DC6655AQ30920641-72D9DD0B-E7D3-4B51-AED7-F5FF18002ADBQ33307806-7CB4F612-9613-4E1B-9391-0FD89E0B341DQ33333136-C5FEECF3-AA0D-4DF2-8CFF-D008B629B626Q33643914-B283836D-58BB-44AA-B6FE-9FCECB5366A8Q33645815-21DB9A0D-B390-45D1-86B3-2717C135B7F3Q33748833-EEF4D135-E7BB-4614-AE09-4B937D5B1AABQ33767489-D190B4EE-44E5-4183-AC97-A68144C86249Q33845770-E96E69B9-D578-43CC-87A3-40D6D4B4E117Q34050753-37E802F7-2A8D-4CA2-AB6B-5867B6AD9F99Q34052459-AEA7F9D2-52AC-4E9C-89E6-E769CD84708FQ34110211-39A14BB1-9389-4C3B-AA20-4723F93CAAE2Q34153612-823BF408-3944-4C75-BF80-38F482E9A944Q34294366-0DADE232-AF9E-4890-8C65-4050FCAF3318Q34336334-231E1AFD-D406-4D7C-B27A-18D6B5AC4638Q34552291-D8F11C3D-EB2D-48B6-A841-D687B9A4A186Q34581281-92721C73-14CC-4D2B-AF08-0CD7D0071B39Q35051538-170B6281-63A0-4B85-9DC1-226B558E09F2Q35132172-2C388E97-F42F-43AE-B0F0-242954F6E376Q35133327-99C7116B-016C-4001-B1E7-D282AC7A4A79Q35136026-775BB80D-901D-4A09-BCF2-120B7F60C9C4Q35161381-C59B50A8-FADB-40DB-81FC-F03DE49AE7F7Q35219043-983CDE40-7E9C-4AA4-850A-2B558E2658F0Q35527020-9B5FD1DA-C7B4-4535-94A6-9A7011AC3F47Q35673294-BC29FB29-EF09-4B4F-BDDB-4D4A97952826Q35674170-021CB291-37D3-4B39-8DAA-893ACDD407DAQ35691678-15D282CA-12FF-4D2D-8C7C-5DE918A5AB54Q35695900-2511E4EB-A213-4B22-ACFB-4FAECCF5A8ACQ35860119-EBB0F589-6249-40C1-8E03-B7AE2BA3F601Q36440349-3272A69A-A9A7-4BB6-9FD8-51BDE45E070DQ36604451-8C8E1D81-EDBF-4EE7-91F0-814B228ABAB6Q36834261-15ED0C46-058D-4C19-B054-92611332D8FEQ36974729-574F0A9F-7E1F-484E-8BAE-D48328A0EBE6Q37045429-55C020C5-C461-4256-9295-7989860ECF49Q37096836-8696A477-E350-4E7D-898B-9412FE7E1A66Q37305215-80403284-6CBA-42EC-9D5D-BA312D0F9725Q37432265-50CBB165-A80A-49E5-BA7B-FD98F0E2DDF4Q37715305-6103F44E-F8D6-4365-B554-861BA3136ED7
P2860
Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.
description
2001 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2001 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2001 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2001年の論文
@ja
2001年論文
@yue
2001年論文
@zh-hant
2001年論文
@zh-hk
2001年論文
@zh-mo
2001年論文
@zh-tw
2001年论文
@wuu
name
Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.
@ast
Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.
@en
Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.
@nl
type
label
Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.
@ast
Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.
@en
Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.
@nl
prefLabel
Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.
@ast
Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.
@en
Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.
@en
P2093
MacLean CH
Shekelle PG
P304
P356
10.7326/0003-4819-135-8_PART_2-200110161-00003
P407
P433
P577
2001-10-01T00:00:00Z