Comparison of class A and D G protein-coupled receptors: common features in structure and activation.
about
Structure of a Double Transmembrane Fragment of a G-Protein-Coupled Receptor in MicellesA novel structural framework for α(1A/D)-adrenoceptor selective antagonists identified using subtype selective pharmacophoresInvited review: GPCR structural characterization: Using fragments as building blocks to determine a complete structure.Comparison of fragments comprising the first two helices of the human Y4 and the yeast Ste2p G-protein-coupled receptorsCross-linking of a DOPA-containing peptide ligand into its G protein-coupled receptorExpression and biophysical analysis of a triple-transmembrane domain-containing fragment from a yeast G protein-coupled receptor.Comparative NMR analysis of an 80-residue G protein-coupled receptor fragment in two membrane mimetic environments.Amino acid residues critical for endoplasmic reticulum export and trafficking of platelet-activating factor receptorOligomerization of G-protein-coupled receptors: lessons from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Changes in conformation at the cytoplasmic ends of the fifth and sixth transmembrane helices of a yeast G protein-coupled receptor in response to ligand binding.Structural characterization of triple transmembrane domain containing fragments of a yeast G protein-coupled receptor in an organic : aqueous environment by solution-state NMR spectroscopyIdentification of destabilizing and stabilizing mutations of Ste2p, a G protein-coupled receptor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Computational methods in drug design: modeling G protein-coupled receptor monomers, dimers, and oligomersThe role of pheromone receptors for communication and mating in Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei).Accessibility of cysteine residues substituted into the cytoplasmic regions of the alpha-factor receptor identifies the intracellular residues that are available for G protein interaction.Quantification of mutation-derived bias for alternate mating functionalities of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ste2p pheromone receptorDouble-mutant cycle scanning of the interaction of a peptide ligand and its G protein-coupled receptor.How and why do GPCRs dimerize?Novel insights on thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor signal transduction.Identification of specific transmembrane residues and ligand-induced interface changes involved in homo-dimer formation of a yeast G protein-coupled receptor.Fungal mating pheromones: choreographing the dating gameThe N-terminus of the yeast G protein-coupled receptor Ste2p plays critical roles in surface expression, signaling, and negative regulation.Homology-based Modeling of Rhodopsin-like Family Members in the Inactive State: Structural Analysis and Deduction of Tips for Modeling and Optimization.NMR Investigation of Structures of G-protein Coupled Receptor Folding Intermediates.How to Choose the Suitable Template for Homology Modelling of GPCRs: 5-HT7 Receptor as a Test Case.Identification of a protein hydrolysate responsive G protein-coupled receptor in enterocytes.Differential activation of polymorphisms of the formyl peptide receptor by formyl peptides.Binding of fluorinated phenylalanine alpha-factor analogues to Ste2p: evidence for a cation-pi binding interaction between a peptide ligand and its cognate G protein-coupled receptor.Similarity between class A and class B G-protein-coupled receptors exemplified through calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor modelling and mutagenesis studies.Do plants contain g protein-coupled receptors?Identification of residues involved in homodimer formation located within a β-strand region of the N-terminus of a Yeast G protein-coupled receptor.Interacting residues in an activated state of a G protein-coupled receptor.Understanding GPCR Recognition and Folding from NMR Studies of Fragments.
P2860
Q27655003-41860A6F-ADA0-408B-942A-2D2147D7D7FEQ28478109-F5F6D6E8-C7DF-46F6-9FA7-79BA5DEB00FFQ30360845-2D8DFF25-BC4B-457B-88A6-9DDDA50190D8Q30561114-B20D9B9A-D8AA-41B3-8847-6D01089A488AQ33400809-537C8003-19D9-4A4E-A4FA-764A3975E387Q33939900-09D77E38-3B0E-4DEA-B454-F10D9C49C38AQ33972236-BB005070-B481-477A-BE9E-C4EF0F7A834EQ34087866-81127ED1-CC81-4216-9ABE-AFAE2E78A178Q34232914-9A2C544E-5D91-4860-8388-0437CFABFF05Q35156750-3FC49C0D-8AE8-4890-B452-0D4CDEC24D3DQ35554000-148C627B-03DF-47ED-8CD9-C2E7ACEE9548Q35554301-18C58244-71BD-40E4-AD8A-AC5931A8E2E5Q35594835-961B5BBA-FD1C-48B3-A02A-DF9506C9F205Q36293662-6D5EBB7C-18BF-48A6-8EA9-444B5C4D4E73Q36860288-771BF497-7503-48F9-8D7E-46E020142131Q36941643-D1FF1B79-C986-489B-BF23-DFC67E50239EQ36990378-1F72814E-657D-4E53-B6CD-956EB47991DAQ37120246-31C720EA-D0E6-426B-A77D-F3E7F2A35B11Q37203610-877F8559-8562-4136-8AC0-3BF728D018C2Q37438039-2F05139B-C9A3-441E-949A-E5B0ACD45C85Q37865612-BED4C6CB-1FA8-4E8D-9F95-42BFB0EC6575Q38798242-4E632E0D-7638-4156-B1F7-E0B5622B832BQ38856178-FCA33254-760E-4BE8-B2A4-D524F00386F2Q39173136-E24EECDC-376E-4415-B600-8DB6C3E30D20Q39469192-E5049D04-84C2-4CE4-90DA-69923A57F3E7Q40239081-B074DA30-4BC0-4477-8A27-234555AEDD01Q40643148-AD499D08-9F16-46CA-BBB7-9000A7C7A742Q42736253-72988ECE-2F8E-4E59-A4E0-91E9062C422EQ43186896-4F0AA795-2FE8-44A2-8564-FB22D630716BQ45920467-6A7B8B9C-6A4D-4D1A-B3CB-F08A4DC968ECQ46095475-BFCC42B3-B94A-4EA2-8413-1F424F292A6AQ46825061-76918A6E-6B22-4D30-AE94-E65B4DFC21C6Q54203381-A46EA4AB-38C0-4E2A-B254-4318D734EEC3
P2860
Comparison of class A and D G protein-coupled receptors: common features in structure and activation.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2005 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
name
Comparison of class A and D G ...... s in structure and activation.
@ast
Comparison of class A and D G ...... s in structure and activation.
@en
Comparison of class A and D G ...... s in structure and activation.
@nl
type
label
Comparison of class A and D G ...... s in structure and activation.
@ast
Comparison of class A and D G ...... s in structure and activation.
@en
Comparison of class A and D G ...... s in structure and activation.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of class A and D G ...... s in structure and activation.
@ast
Comparison of class A and D G ...... s in structure and activation.
@en
Comparison of class A and D G ...... s in structure and activation.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Comparison of class A and D G ...... s in structure and activation.
@en
P2093
James B Konopka
Markus Eilers
Steven O Smith
Viktor Hornak
P2860
P304
P356
10.1021/BI047316U
P407
P577
2005-06-01T00:00:00Z