Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis.
about
Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analysesPreviously unidentified duplicate registrations of clinical trials: an exploratory analysis of registry data worldwide.A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published resultsEvidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meetingUsing ClinicalTrials.gov to supplement information in ophthalmology conference abstracts about trial outcomes: a comparison study.Systematic Reviewers in Clinical Neurology Do Not Routinely Search Clinical Trials Registries.Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.Clinical trials registries are underused in the pregnancy and childbirth literature: a systematic review of the top 20 journals.Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.Systematic review protocol assessing the processes for linking clinical trial registries and their published results.Database choices in endocrine systematic reviewsDiscrepancies between ClinicalTrials.gov recruitment status and actual trial status: a cross-sectional analysis.A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review.Index of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine industry clinical study programmes and non-industry funded studies: a necessary basis to address reporting bias in a systematic review.Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews.
P2860
Q30235881-8DD8CE4F-C143-46E3-AC15-25743CA0B31BQ31115101-F3481DF3-81FE-485D-B1DB-805D851D95CAQ33864361-B0A6F35F-0613-4071-AA5F-21FE49B75F2CQ35604866-F2589B4A-B0A9-4C80-B233-6D4E54286C3FQ35673269-E5DC951B-5FA7-4728-9CCD-AD4FA977E2D8Q35725894-CC238917-3684-4C05-8EB7-AA557ABAF61BQ36027782-B7578222-3C70-44ED-A6F9-718F6286C4DCQ36171533-590C4EB2-290B-4B2E-87C6-F85E8B41F0F9Q36337697-E075D1E7-D967-41F1-BDCB-2BABD2960FD8Q37356008-70808EC1-403D-4E6D-AC64-328DE9F2E05DQ38618960-96AD8962-43E4-4541-B04D-D2175E76F8DAQ42650121-2D0E4E36-3716-4F9C-A455-2FCC6ABE5A1BQ47093430-9A9C6911-9EC2-43DF-8BA1-C1F1DFBBB406Q48216988-1F1E3ED9-4BB5-4503-B32A-7A9C539194DEQ55360746-764291C3-7BD5-451C-98F0-66EA441420E3
P2860
Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis.
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2014 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
name
Clinical trials registries are ...... s: a cross-sectional analysis.
@ast
Clinical trials registries are ...... s: a cross-sectional analysis.
@en
Clinical trials registries are ...... s: a cross-sectional analysis.
@nl
type
label
Clinical trials registries are ...... s: a cross-sectional analysis.
@ast
Clinical trials registries are ...... s: a cross-sectional analysis.
@en
Clinical trials registries are ...... s: a cross-sectional analysis.
@nl
prefLabel
Clinical trials registries are ...... s: a cross-sectional analysis.
@ast
Clinical trials registries are ...... s: a cross-sectional analysis.
@en
Clinical trials registries are ...... s: a cross-sectional analysis.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Clinical trials registries are ...... s: a cross-sectional analysis.
@en
P2093
Christopher W Jones
Lukas G Keil
Mark A Weaver
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/2046-4053-3-126
P577
2014-10-27T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1022323211