Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review
about
A living document: reincarnating the research articlePreferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statementSTRengthening analytical thinking for observational studies: the STRATOS initiativeAn Investigation of the Shortcomings of the CONSORT 2010 Statement for the Reporting of Group Sequential Randomised Controlled Trials: A Methodological Systematic ReviewReporting trends of randomised controlled trials in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic reviewA systematic review protocol for reporting deficiencies within surgical case seriesMethodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic reviewThe quality of reporting methods and results of cost-effectiveness analyses in Spain: a methodological systematic reviewThe CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline developmentTiming and completeness of trial results posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in journalsNonindustry-sponsored preclinical studies on statins yield greater efficacy estimates than industry-sponsored studies: a meta-analysisAvoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study.Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal instructions to authorsReporting of context and implementation in studies of global health interventions: a pilot study.Missing steps in a staircase: a qualitative study of the perspectives of key stakeholders on the use of adaptive designs in confirmatory trials.Using the STROBE statement to assess reporting in blindness prevalence surveys in low and middle income countries.Assessing the utility of an institutional publications officer: a pilot assessment.Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic reviewImpact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study.CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trialsConsolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.The Relationship between Risk of Bias Criteria, Research Outcomes, and Study Sponsorship in a Cohort of Preclinical Thiazolidinedione Animal Studies: A Meta-AnalysisTesting the PRISMA-Equity 2012 reporting guideline: the perspectives of systematic review authors.Elevating quality with manditory use of standard reporting guidelinesThe use of systematic reviews and reporting guidelines to advance the implementation of the 3Rs.Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trialsWhat affects authors' and editors' use of reporting guidelines? Findings from an online survey and qualitative interviews.Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial.Heterogeneity of the definition of elderly age in current orthopaedic research.Transparency of Outcome Reporting and Trial Registration of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.Associated Factors and Consequences of Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Yoga: A Systematic Review.Quality of Reporting and Study Design of CKD Cohort Studies Assessing Mortality in the Elderly Before and After STROBE: A Systematic ReviewSupportive care for men with prostate cancer: why are the trials not working? A systematic review and recommendations for future trials.Confidentiality considerations for use of social-spatial data on the social determinants of health: Sexual and reproductive health case study.CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trialsThe Devil Is in the Details: Incomplete Reporting in Preclinical Animal Research.Protocol for the development of a CONSORT-equity guideline to improve reporting of health equity in randomized trials.Impact of a web-based tool (WebCONSORT) to improve the reporting of randomised trials: results of a randomised controlled trial.Quality of missing data reporting and handling in palliative care trials demonstrates that further development of the CONSORT statement is required: a systematic review.
P2860
Q21128660-542E1DB2-79A8-4384-8975-54A541C8A643Q21195843-3E8BAB78-1D1C-4BA8-A8FD-565A0BE0C007Q24289520-FF55E39A-E52E-480E-A7D3-4AD06EF73FA4Q26777085-2F50A8A3-764F-43CE-95AD-946095CD1C82Q26779538-DFF45BB5-A2E2-4447-81CD-2521068DED05Q26781894-2F9AE044-2D02-49EC-8C9C-9735B628D0BFQ26782088-7775446D-2D08-4E2C-9B69-BB8DA434440FQ28073282-126BBA1C-48D8-4151-B38A-70B3D2BDA171Q28302523-A7A7BC00-2083-4D43-B946-C51CCF362F26Q28535706-348C755E-DD5A-4604-B346-655ACAD95FEDQ28538894-68C78D6F-8A6F-4083-B066-91F6B855E08CQ28651692-B3FDD5FE-0872-48B8-9ED6-25EBEDCE486CQ30552717-9AE596B9-2A06-4207-BADF-0AC74985C86DQ30566026-6B7A25BD-E53D-4CD5-8AC8-EA4463772F5EQ30579881-608D8145-1861-48CD-8E2B-157D848160FAQ30666196-968A708E-F7E5-4461-92A5-818652F562A1Q33648127-A80271E0-B92D-4F69-850E-9E6E228774F7Q33756337-F9980353-9EBD-4FC4-BE7D-56A797FE0A85Q33804561-0CEE4289-FB48-4C26-9E1B-6D21E6DD5596Q33829090-C9922694-9E71-4743-97DB-1E613BBDDCF5Q33857464-37774D18-8699-4845-81E1-3903D128138FQ34636815-331CC276-7FD7-4E58-846A-1F514C7E149AQ35012566-2CD6AE62-4442-4C37-9BFE-2945C2B5944FQ35018200-A1CFAB64-F8C0-4ADD-8D9F-C79171857A1BQ35226970-3DC831B8-62FE-45D3-967D-834E1F2D231BQ35244647-9745894F-E587-4ED3-8792-DB984968EA1EQ35303719-6144AEB0-0F84-4126-B949-F540A07C2012Q35431427-D69802E6-6DFE-497F-86BE-E4208A0604D3Q35775281-59C108AD-E30F-479C-AE7A-416E49BE2631Q35787491-E04B95D1-B625-41B5-91C0-7E28976C4E0AQ35845397-A753D60C-2DA4-4638-A842-3C82456942CBQ35858660-53AAAD8A-12A5-44E9-8788-F1F1AFA1FC17Q36014629-01076018-EF72-456F-8954-1B12EC3BF1BFQ36023895-C15F8398-0023-48E8-BC75-17222C118EBEQ36107943-9E199987-E529-4CA0-BE26-84DB7752F350Q36173563-979A7F40-CD2F-40FD-863E-A929DEBEC899Q36195278-9F6FC143-977B-4939-A06E-8C889696DF94Q36200139-BDB59C96-4614-4224-934B-1724AF3363F6Q36206010-2B4835A3-5997-486C-BEE9-D056F039A6A0Q36378102-25F391B7-794A-4658-B704-6F9C0CA2FB6C
P2860
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012 թուականի Նոյեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2012 թվականի նոյեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
name
Does use of the CONSORT Statem ...... al journals? A Cochrane review
@ast
Does use of the CONSORT Statem ...... al journals? A Cochrane review
@en
Does use of the CONSORT Statem ...... al journals? A Cochrane review
@nl
type
label
Does use of the CONSORT Statem ...... al journals? A Cochrane review
@ast
Does use of the CONSORT Statem ...... al journals? A Cochrane review
@en
Does use of the CONSORT Statem ...... al journals? A Cochrane review
@nl
prefLabel
Does use of the CONSORT Statem ...... al journals? A Cochrane review
@ast
Does use of the CONSORT Statem ...... al journals? A Cochrane review
@en
Does use of the CONSORT Statem ...... al journals? A Cochrane review
@nl
P2860
P50
P356
P1433
P1476
Does use of the CONSORT Statem ...... al journals? A Cochrane review
@en
P2093
Kenneth F Schulz
Lucy Turner
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/2046-4053-1-60
P577
2012-11-29T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1018792197