Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34512822

about

Cancer diagnostic classifiers based on quantitative DNA methylation Advantages of evaluating mean nuclear volume as an adjunct parameter in prostate cancer.DNA methylation gene-based models indicating independent poor outcome in prostate cancer.Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer: Guideline recommendations The Quantitative Criteria Based on the Fractal Dimensions, Entropy, and Lacunarity for the Spatial Distribution of Cancer Cell Nuclei Enable Identification of Low or High Aggressive Prostate Carcinomas.Prognostic histopathological and molecular markers on prostate cancer needle-biopsies: a review On the relationship between tumor structure and complexity of the spatial distribution of cancer cell nuclei: a fractal geometrical model of prostate carcinoma.Computer-Aided Image Analysis and Fractal Synthesis in the Quantitative Evaluation of Tumor Aggressiveness in Prostate Carcinomas Gleason grading challenges in the diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma: experience of a single institution.Effect of pathologic revision and Ki67 and ERG immunohistochemistry on predicting radical prostatectomy outcome in men initially on active surveillance.Gleason inflation 1998-2011: a registry study of 97,168 men.Prognostic implications of 2005 Gleason grade modification. Population-based study of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.Pathology Imagebase-a reference image database for standardization of pathology.Prostate cancer antigen-3 (PCA3) and PCA3-based nomograms in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: an external validation of Hansen's nomogram on a Norwegian cohort.Ability of PITX2 methylation to predict survival in patients with prostate cancer.Interpathologist concordance in the histological diagnosis of focal prostatic atrophy lesions, acute and chronic prostatitis, PIN, and prostate cancer.On complexity and homogeneity measures in predicting biological aggressiveness of prostate cancer; Implication of the cellular automata model of tumor growth.Translationally controlled tumor protein in prostatic adenocarcinoma: correlation with tumor grading and treatment-related changes.The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists.Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.Handling and reporting of transperineal template prostate biopsy in Europe: a web-based survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP).[Objective grading of prostate carcinoma based on fractal dimensions: Gleason 3 + 4= 7a ≠ Gleason 4 + 3 =7b].Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.On cribriform prostate cancer.DNA methylation ofPITX2predicts poor survival in men with prostate cancer Clinical significance of subtypes of Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer

P2860

Q27012960-6B12C694-EA0E-48E0-8BE0-3123F1F8FEB2 Q33874522-599CD19D-CF55-435B-AED4-2B3C1D888596 Q34174356-D2DAE907-9916-4CA5-B281-AFD2AB8D4196 Q35725546-DFD0CECB-195A-453E-A2AC-2EE76D14F7A1 Q36568781-190D15DD-1B33-4731-8A6E-79AD3B0529DB Q38253055-850EDC10-184C-49C0-ACC3-C617AFCDD61A Q38302346-8F21857A-5FFF-4D06-A6F1-0FC86AF192B2 Q38446649-AD7E9547-C32C-412B-9D34-90EB19EE8E48 Q38632033-059EA0CA-29FC-4ADB-87AA-57D00BE960FB Q38764526-8D5E1287-2079-4D39-9B88-7DECD149F64F Q39199397-0A3F1FB6-DF9B-44E7-800B-1E3CB176C093 Q39501766-08EBB6E3-DD72-4183-BD94-D526A616DE17 Q40116896-A6CFBA4F-C959-4D43-98ED-FDADD1AF7646 Q40216437-6D865153-4D9B-4BBB-9C4A-50DAF48252C4 Q40230694-B29F4662-259E-4FD1-856B-02B708D5DADF Q40244370-5BBC44D6-5CB7-459C-B468-75519E36D730 Q40437169-D4877B38-9371-4C5C-AC23-45907A137D4F Q43125303-845EE234-E17D-452A-A040-B86C079ECDDB Q44345074-8E1CECB9-F31D-4859-A315-6D040957635D Q46393657-1CCED0BA-81DB-4824-B7DB-67C36079B961 Q48062857-76C0AF2C-5423-459B-879F-D6574E2B29D2 Q50073783-E7139DC7-DA17-4C5A-A6E6-DED5873E3F96 Q53149206-539FAE89-BC1A-48C3-9DF1-DF832756358E Q54349639-D559909B-9DBC-4E6F-BA47-C843A65E6F23 Q55020762-0DB9C650-CCB4-47F0-9CDB-52FC78805480 Q58327420-216386BB-EBFE-4E56-9A1F-7000AECA7115 Q58562217-60C83C82-F11B-42E6-84CC-68E8A348FBA2

P2860

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34512822

description

2013 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2013 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2013 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2013年の論文

@ja

2013年論文

@yue

2013年論文

@zh-hant

2013年論文

@zh-hk

2013年論文

@zh-mo

2013年論文

@zh-tw

2013年论文

@wuu

name

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

@ast

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

@en

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

@nl

type

label

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

@ast

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

@en

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

@nl

prefLabel

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

@ast

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

@en

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.

@nl

P1433

Q34512822-84FAEBFC-1FB2-4241-BEEC-6B0541605D7C

P1476

Q34512822-151A60FC-A9A6-4F7A-AE9A-F47E390A3A80

P2093

Q34512822-1D3B55F4-688F-4395-BCF7-3AB185B82731

Q34512822-26609775-766E-46E0-85D0-AC253B95DA29

Q34512822-383A4199-9964-4B84-AB0C-54430265AC35

Q34512822-3C59D149-5481-437B-BE86-02F3A824E822

Q34512822-423A2568-C72B-4492-A0A0-F781E8B5D3CA

Q34512822-4BD60F01-C5DA-4A7E-B618-3EE2B32EBE36

Q34512822-54984213-D10C-4BB6-AF4E-751C15B91AF2

Q34512822-564C7949-DC42-4DBE-A85A-5B46CA945629

Q34512822-6AF76E1C-25BF-49DE-8A8E-C090129B0281

Q34512822-6F23BCC3-C36D-4F78-B218-5D0227A2D832

P2860

Q34512822-0AFC6188-BEA3-4D29-9843-B545D2B0957C

Q34512822-0FD0304E-1B4F-4476-8D78-CC804D23A4FD

Q34512822-1B068697-DC5B-46F2-9FB3-30F1064B0C91

Q34512822-21DFAAEB-760A-4562-91EA-C3589C8B04D2

Q34512822-49376D4A-F304-459D-8FB4-45B34C3BFEC1

Q34512822-5BB14187-A8C0-4240-9E1C-D60F87345AA3

Q34512822-629130D2-6094-4D90-A5F0-842B6EAFC75F

Q34512822-70DCE7B9-CAB2-40B9-8A73-B5F70022F88F

Q34512822-752F5176-67EA-4D0D-8B22-54CF753E59EC

Q34512822-85736656-B97F-440B-B0F7-C3379F45C255

P304

Q34512822-5E902217-24B5-4404-8D7A-20B8697F04F2

P31

Q34512822-4480C8BB-D7A0-4378-A712-067273A7BBB3

P356

Q34512822-B320AF5B-100B-4483-85B5-7B7C3378086F

P433

Q34512822-35678578-CD23-47E4-B51B-24E0686DD4E0

P478

Q34512822-1750F17E-2398-4875-80ED-215CE8886A9B

P50

Q34512822-9F3C7F81-875E-4116-B527-51B1B460099F

Q34512822-C0760C7D-04E3-45AA-A979-6C75A15C8C73

P577

Q34512822-CB2F7963-6D3C-42A1-9142-1BB0441EF9A7

P698

Q34512822-2826B639-EB55-42A5-8EF1-4E3A8343B438

P356

P1433

P1476

Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists

@en

P2093

Amar S Ahmad

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Andrew J Evans

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Antonio Lopez-Beltran

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ben Vainer

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Cord Langner

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

David Griffiths

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Eva Compérat

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ferran Algaba

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Glen Kristiansen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Liliane Boccon-Gibod

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

Gleason scoring: a comparison of classical and modified (international society of urological pathology) criteria using nadir PSA as a clinical end point.

The potential impact of reproducibility of Gleason grading in men with early stage prostate cancer managed by active surveillance: a multi-institutional study.

Interactive digital slides with heat maps: a novel method to improve the reproducibility of Gleason grading.

Gleason grading: past, present and future.

Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings.

Handling and reporting of nephrectomy specimens for adult renal tumours: a survey by the European Network of Uropathology.

Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.

Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.

Reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostate cancer can be improved by the use of reference images.

P304

247-256

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/HIS.12008

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

62

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2013-01-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

23240715

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string