Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
about
Host control of insect endogenous retroviruses: small RNA silencing and immune responseRetroviral elements and their hosts: insertional mutagenesis in the mouse germ line.Plasticity of animal genome architecture unmasked by rapid evolution of a pelagic tunicateTransposable element evolution in Heliconius suggests genome diversity within LepidopteraLizards and LINEs: selection and demography affect the fate of L1 retrotransposons in the genome of the green anole (Anolis carolinensis)Frequency of intron loss correlates with processed pseudogene abundance: a novel strategy to test the reverse transcriptase model of intron lossLarge-scale transcriptome analysis of retroelements in the migratory locust, Locusta migratoriaThe transposable element profile of the anolis genome: How a lizard can provide insights into the evolution of vertebrate genome size and structurePaleogenomic record of the extinction of human endogenous retrovirus ERV9An active non-LTR retrotransposon with tandem structure in the compact genome of the pufferfish Tetraodon nigroviridisAchilles, a New Family of Transcriptionally Active Retrotransposons from the Olive Fruit Fly, with Y Chromosome Preferential DistributionLosing helena: the extinction of a drosophila line-like element.Burst of young retrogenes and independent retrogene formation in mammals.Dynamics of transposable elements: towards a community ecology of the genome.Effects of recombination rate and gene density on transposable element distributions in Arabidopsis thalianaRapid evolution of piRNA pathway in the teleost fish: implication for an adaptation to transposon diversity.Non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons: mechanisms, recent developments, and unanswered questions.Evolution of transcription factor binding in metazoans - mechanisms and functional implications.Impact of transposable elements on the evolution of mammalian gene regulation.SINEs and LINEs: symbionts of eukaryotic genomes with a common tail.The evolution and diversity of DNA transposons in the genome of the Lizard Anolis carolinensis.The first steps of transposable elements invasion: parasitic strategy vs. genetic driftChromosomal organization of repetitive DNA sequences in Astyanax bockmanni (Teleostei, Characiformes): dispersive location, association and co-localization in the genome.Reverse transcriptase domain sequences from tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa) long terminal repeat retrotransposons: sequence characterization and phylogenetic analysis.Evolutionary transitions in the Asteraceae coincide with marked shifts in transposable element abundance.The ecology of the genome - mobile DNA elements and their hosts.Recent LTR retrotransposon insertion contrasts with waves of non-LTR insertion since speciation in Drosophila melanogaster.Effects of recombination rate on human endogenous retrovirus fixation and persistence.Drawing a fine line on endogenous retroelement activityTransfer RNA gene-targeted integration: an adaptation of retrotransposable elements to survive in the compact Dictyostelium discoideum genome.The recent evolution of human L1 retrotransposons.Abundance, distribution and dynamics of retrotransposable elements and transposons: similarities and differences.Chromosomal location of retrotransposable REX 1 in the genomes in five Prochilodus (Teleostei: Characiformes.Transposable elements as a potential source for understanding the fish genome.Embryonic expression of endogenous retroviral RNAs in somatic tissues adjacent to the Oikopleura germlineAcquisition of Full-Length Viral Helicase Domains by Insect Retrotransposon-Encoded Polypeptides.Ty1-copia group retrotransposon families in cultivated cottons G. barbadense L. identified by reverse transcriptase domain analysis.Bioinformatics and genomic analysis of transposable elements in eukaryotic genomes.Using bioinformatic and phylogenetic approaches to classify transposable elements and understand their complex evolutionary histories.The evolutionary dynamics of autonomous non-LTR retrotransposons in the lizard Anolis carolinensis shows more similarity to fish than mammals.
P2860
Q24701796-0A9C6927-E9A3-4737-91C3-38AF6A493B6EQ25255710-B3E98639-130B-4FE9-BD57-08FC67D1E076Q28334396-08D99A3A-F6A5-46E9-BBFD-165076C912EBQ28657610-62B74564-24D5-4DB3-A070-CE2D747C2036Q28677670-E0CEB672-32C6-49FA-BEF2-4E02D2F28F36Q28703895-DC627525-9CBC-495D-AF36-35EB9C06E8FBQ28727429-490BEBD6-9FD4-4118-AEC2-EF623E54E10CQ28744078-1BE7ED14-625A-4017-83E9-40535BD23AF2Q28769724-13EDBA76-068D-43A2-A7A5-946E8E684D2DQ28775890-F2E80B32-7B95-47CB-81D8-2753EB54888DQ30996181-0BDD86E1-8C34-4F6E-8D30-6B846A6F4F89Q33326336-A2199F58-8D9B-4243-B616-9C67BFD32FD6Q33422997-032513F8-FF5C-48B9-A7E8-C509B7328AF0Q33470970-8E8F8AA3-BADA-4EEA-B037-AC362C9B077AQ33682824-C27C0DBE-DB30-45DB-9F53-33E9C5593C03Q33836718-923BE248-F5AB-489C-B1F8-23A84E440C71Q33898508-3AF79E37-3DD4-480B-8E21-73E50A247F54Q34245588-40D1ADEC-4F45-4FC4-A34A-18B086BEC6B8Q34442055-258CF2EE-2D2E-49F8-9FD3-5A2B382DB60AQ34442069-6D5BEB8E-90F7-4CB1-86A6-E9A89139E840Q34458419-DFA24565-59D3-4EEF-A219-B3EBBB43D2B7Q34570688-45C8FB2E-1D57-4CA6-83A2-C63AFA630BD8Q34979244-082C1169-2F49-42F2-B325-3625C27FEEFCQ35613471-ED39715D-64AD-4FCC-A3CF-C9034004754EQ35750879-2490C4DB-D386-4FCD-B096-2BD16D8224EAQ36004587-94B741D8-6A70-472B-8C17-A1605EEAE870Q36090183-86A26132-4928-48A0-AF35-EA811949F4EFQ36099013-FA1E49A1-1CCC-497F-B264-90DB9A6A6990Q36106583-7465124E-EEB4-4C49-B58C-04B145F317B5Q36225320-243CE818-9DE3-46B5-AAD1-1A7CF69F2B7AQ36225358-AC6906AB-8AEB-49CA-B0D3-8729A9D19ABAQ36225364-D09A019A-6D26-478F-A8B2-3E02EA5450FAQ37267311-EF0C97A4-8803-486C-9F19-A9462670AF86Q38668441-D8F36C9B-93C0-4686-89B6-18DE42AFA6E8Q39771374-7DC7CC6D-CC73-4B74-AB5A-9B917300F863Q40844181-5B0C8BA3-3F05-411C-A81F-49C57DA46196Q46478363-59511EF8-9F2F-4623-B3C6-12E47D1FFBD7Q46681274-A2BCC7E7-20D6-4383-B4B3-B84607132308Q47105297-A07F6D91-EB51-41FC-B810-07921FC35865Q50594942-15B7C653-ED89-403D-B469-A651052D3CED
P2860
Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002 թուականի Դեկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2002 թվականի դեկտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
name
Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
@ast
Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
@en
Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
@nl
type
label
Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
@ast
Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
@en
Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
@nl
prefLabel
Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
@ast
Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
@en
Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
@nl
P1476
Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
@en
P2093
Anthony V Furano
Thomas H Eickbush
P304
P356
10.1016/S0959-437X(02)00359-3
P577
2002-12-01T00:00:00Z