Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.
about
Cardiac and electro-cortical concomitants of social feedback processing in womenCompetition-related factors directly influence preferences for facial cues of dominance in alliesNeural correlates of gender differences in reputation buildingDo human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy?Does the sex difference in competitiveness decrease in selective sub-populations? A test with intercollegiate distance runners.Thumbs up or thumbs down? Effects of neuroticism and depressive symptoms on psychophysiological responses to social evaluation in healthy students.The development of human female competition: allies and adversaries.Own Attractiveness and Dissatisfaction With Physical Appearance Independently Predict the Salience of Facial Cues to Size When Women Judge Other Women's Attractiveness.Social exclusion weakens storage capacity and attentional filtering ability in visual working memory.Ostracizing for a Reason: A Novel Source Paradigm for Examining the Nature and Consequences of Motivated Ostracism.Is She Angry? (Sexually Desirable) Women "See" Anger on Female Faces.Human males appear more prepared than females to resolve conflicts with same-sex peers.Ostracism in Everyday Life: The Effects of Ostracism on Those Who Ostracize.Stressful life events, relationship stressors, and cortisol reactivity: The moderating role of suppression.When compliments don't hit but critiques do: an fMRI study into self-esteem and self-knowledge in processing social feedback.
P2860
Q27320663-CCF3B71B-6F08-43B9-96C1-3C7E271CDB96Q28596021-56AE724A-E244-4652-8ABC-1E2BB3E2DA5EQ34122422-2ABA101D-8C55-4BC9-A421-C9A02992F88EQ34380821-C2DF0FBE-4A20-43A4-8879-C84944A2E81AQ35543831-B2FDF11C-75AF-4D56-8D30-BA49D6EBEDD9Q37245893-7A0CB0CE-2DD2-48D6-A829-F3183611F2A9Q37304207-94835E9B-B885-49EF-A375-41941B51530CQ38692557-DA6AAEF1-0C98-4172-9014-C9BE0E19856BQ47576541-C8D27341-1DF9-4AC1-A6F7-8B9679CFC32DQ47623902-409C59A0-C95E-4B51-8F25-D9D1DC1999F6Q47640647-4069EC29-9970-4E24-801E-E6A1AA18C77EQ47768229-03848699-82EE-4E02-9E96-2C2D1D85ED4DQ47990076-D52627C6-2FAE-4AFA-BDD2-509D88A10C61Q50054425-31B02A6F-58A6-47C8-9F78-797188136447Q55119857-94BDDAA8-2F54-4184-A17C-ADCE2199462F
P2860
Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2013 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
name
Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.
@ast
Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.
@en
Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.
@nl
type
label
Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.
@ast
Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.
@en
Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.
@nl
prefLabel
Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.
@ast
Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.
@en
Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Social exclusion: more important to human females than males.
@en
P2093
Brittney Hultgren
Grace Bullock
Henry Markovits
Joyce F Benenson
Richard Wrangham
Tuyet Nguyen
P2860
P304
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0055851
P407
P577
2013-02-06T00:00:00Z