Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.
about
How do women trade-off benefits and risks in chemotherapy treatment decisions based on gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer? A discrete choice experimentWhen outcome is a balance: methods to measure combined utility for the choice between induction of labour and expectant management in mild risk pregnancy at termHIV vaccine acceptability among immigrant Thai residents in Los Angeles: a mixed-method approachConsumer preferences for hearing aid attributes: a comparison of rating and conjoint analysis methodsDepression treatment preferences of older white and Mexican origin menIs the Nintendo Wii Fit really acceptable to older people? A discrete choice experiment.Patients' preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician.Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing.A review of studies examining stated preferences for cancer screening.A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.Willingness to pay to avoid metastatic breast cancer treatment side effects: results from a conjoint analysis.Value of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer in a Probability-Based US Online SampleThe influence of health care policies and health care system distrust on willingness to undergo genetic testing.Use of conjoint analysis to assess HIV vaccine acceptability: feasibility of an innovation in the assessment of consumer health-care preferences.Personal utility and genomic information: look before you leapWhat patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' prioritiesAdaptive choice-based conjoint analysis: a new patient-centered approach to the assessment of health service preferences.A review of self-testing for HIV: research and policy priorities in a new era of HIV prevention.How much do patients' preferences contribute to resource use?What are the key attributes of primary care for patients? Building a conceptual 'map' of patient preferences.Preferences for evidence-based practice dissemination in addiction agencies serving women: a discrete-choice conjoint experiment.Elderly patients' experiences using adaptive conjoint analysis software as a decision aid for osteoarthritis of the knee.Modeling the Mental Health Practice Change Preferences of Educators: A Discrete-Choice Conjoint Experiment.How do physician assessments of patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests differ from actual preferences? A comparison in Canada and the United States using a stated-choice surveyModeling mental health information preferences during the early adult years: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.Chronic pain patients' treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment.A Comparison of Methods for Capturing Patient Preferences for Delivery of Mental Health Services to Low-Income Hispanics Engaged in Primary Care.Caregiver characteristics and economic cost of home-based care: a case study of Maun and Gumare villages in North West District, Botswana.Discrete-choice experiments versus rating scale exercises to evaluate the importance of attributes.Examining Parents' Preferences for Group and Individual Parent Training for Children with ADHD SymptomsSmoking cessation among Norwegian adolescents and young adults: preferred cessation methods.The interim service preferences of parents waiting for children's mental health treatment: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.Randomized trial of presenting absolute v. relative risk reduction in the elicitation of patient values for heart disease prevention with conjoint analysis.Modeling the anti-cyberbullying preferences of university students: Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis.Estimating Preferences for Complex Health Technologies: Lessons Learned and Implications for Personalized Medicine.Practitioners preferences of care coordination for older people: A discrete choice experiment.Modeling the Decision of Mental Health Providers to Implement Evidence-Based Children's Mental Health Services: A Discrete Choice Conjoint Experiment.What Do Patients Want from Otolaryngologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment.People with dementia and carer preferences for home support services in early-stage dementia.
P2860
Q24658523-14D1430A-006B-4493-80B4-C36945E7BBCFQ33289914-4F92EF6E-BDA1-4E5C-8202-203DED0E7FE6Q33689222-2D4C3C37-D1B9-4FEC-8DB5-4D5AD6A60276Q33695793-D6C27353-FA33-4607-8DC9-32E8A2D7AAE0Q33699263-3D8DFB17-94AC-4E21-AECD-945E136FDCA7Q34051661-E245BC18-7989-45B6-8184-C8870EAA46C9Q34337469-FCF650F9-3ED0-428D-B5A4-F13F292B7A3AQ34623445-B804A3D7-3DE0-430C-A5B2-531821334F2AQ35131307-0FFA7EBF-A831-480F-B00C-027B0DC7BA97Q35231568-378FFA4D-4D76-4F39-B8BD-D095D9563C1DQ35661600-5F69C405-82F6-461D-AC8A-FE0EC4877F4FQ35850612-B7AE3021-5785-4C03-9D8F-F6A780F61E8EQ35989670-BBEA5B74-4EDF-4593-B4BD-01EB355417D3Q36022717-5C5DCE2A-5088-4B6D-9B56-9EA751DE5611Q36158668-AD410AF6-BFAD-44A7-9687-7EF800C67E0DQ36495429-C7876D21-53FF-4449-A524-579385069FB8Q36632070-A8315D5B-DE21-4D10-B423-C6A868269EFAQ36892873-843B5A0F-9661-4C83-8636-920BFE59C31BQ37318523-A9E478B6-DAC8-48E3-BFD9-5AB1F8D96881Q37332016-7839C5D3-738E-4650-8731-DCA087BD2746Q37396512-A0BC39BE-2860-4A75-AF07-167D0EBEAA91Q37446207-F81A6C29-9024-4892-9C3F-3C44AAE9F9F2Q37583099-B54AE476-4DD4-4DDA-98AA-1367910264DCQ37661469-092D00BE-7D47-4544-A6C0-0F399AD345D5Q37718252-24CDB3C5-F16C-4B77-9511-8582CF56D378Q38148000-C13A592B-FB64-4D02-9E22-4393DF02D124Q38221971-3EB5C7DB-EAC5-491A-9A5F-666622929FABQ40186513-46A7E726-6B15-431F-8E78-08BABA8993CBQ40796666-9082ECC0-F538-49FF-9362-368B7858DBACQ41122723-1E5C54F5-86CB-48B0-8453-1F061666DB19Q42735042-4D537956-7997-431F-8945-AAD538DF6817Q43524084-763AD9A7-A7A6-4C20-A41F-F8392B02C99DQ45350352-B5C5E682-4506-4AFF-9DCE-3603F2BB27FAQ46326295-D30453C8-37D3-41E8-9C28-C2BB98C65778Q46728334-C409D085-E550-4232-A3DA-92EEC3E735B4Q47363206-3D5B3A72-BC1D-4F87-9E7F-6AD85E491790Q47563260-8F83B128-B7AB-4167-9EDD-9006B1517C4AQ47620183-D2E54BC4-6523-40C9-AE25-3254F20345D6Q47796765-8D159ADF-E5E4-43E1-93C7-F9E46C9974F1Q48223791-D8E5CF6C-773E-4F7D-9AFD-534C56F0FC42
P2860
Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002 թուականի Դեկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2002 թվականի դեկտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
name
Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.
@ast
Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.
@en
Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.
@nl
type
label
Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.
@ast
Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.
@en
Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.
@nl
prefLabel
Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.
@ast
Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.
@en
Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.
@en
P2093
F Reed Johnson
Kathryn A Phillips
Tara Maddala
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/1475-6773.01116
P577
2002-12-01T00:00:00Z