The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
about
Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient settingOverestimating outcome rates: statistical estimation when reliability is suboptimalProfiling quality of care: Is there a role for peer review?Design of a retrospective patient record study on the occurrence of adverse events among patients in Dutch hospitalsTreatment patterns for prostate cancer: comparison of Medicare claims data to medical record review.Using electronic medical record data to report laboratory adverse events.Statistical controversies in clinical research: Value of adverse events relatedness to study treatment: analyses of data from randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials.Examining intra-rater and inter-rater response agreement: a medical chart abstraction study of a community-based asthma care program.Evaluation of the value of attribution in the interpretation of adverse event data: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group investigation.Associations between patient factors and adverse events in the home care setting: a secondary data analysis of two canadian adverse event studies.To what extent are adverse events found in patient records reported by patients and healthcare professionals via complaints, claims and incident reports?Characteristics and predictors of missed opportunities in lung cancer diagnosis: an electronic health record-based study.A review of patient safety measures based on routinely collected hospital data.Identifying potentially preventable complications using a present on admission indicatorData quality assessment in healthcare: a 365-day chart review of inpatients' health records at a Nigerian tertiary hospital.Design of a prospective cohort study to assess ethnic inequalities in patient safety in hospital care using mixed methods.A string of mistakes: the importance of cascade analysis in describing, counting, and preventing medical errors.Beyond the medical record: other modes of error acknowledgment.Performance characteristics of a methodology to quantify adverse events over time in hospitalized patientsDetection of errors by attending physicians on a general medicine service.Ethnic minority patients not at increased risk of adverse events during hospitalisation in urban hospitals in the Netherlands: results of a prospective observational study.Adverse drug events identified by triggers at a teaching hospital in Brazil.Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool.Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience.Using prospective clinical surveillance to identify adverse events in hospital.Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of adverse events and rates of preventable adverse events in acute care hospitalsRate of medical errors in affiliated hospitals of mazandaran university of medical sciences.CareTrack Kids-part 3. Adverse events in children's healthcare in Australia: study protocol for a retrospective medical record reviewInsights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technologyA comparative assessment of adverse event classification in the out-of-hospital setting.Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospitalIs researching adverse events in hospital deaths a good way to describe patient safety in hospitals: a retrospective patient record review study.How effective are patient safety initiatives? A retrospective patient record review study of changes to patient safety over time.Detecting adverse events in surgery: comparing events detected by the Veterans Health Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Patient Safety IndicatorsMeasurement of patient safety: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of adverse event detection with record review.Patient safety: What does it all mean?The sensitivity of adverse event cost estimates to diagnostic coding error.Experiences with global trigger tool reviews in five Danish hospitals: an implementation studyIntegrating incident reporting into an electronic patient record system.Improving patient safety through the systematic evaluation of patient outcomes.
P2860
Q24550591-720451C4-8739-4C30-8C86-9F4C850C005FQ24674055-17225DDB-8E36-4762-BFEE-50402E7647AFQ24796419-19E27E47-6360-4B7C-BA46-B4F75ABE1665Q28219374-B1BDD7F4-574E-4B03-8F99-7894F660ADCCQ30580698-9BFE0DEA-F95F-44EE-B77C-F09CED3BC353Q31158675-4C9E1176-55FD-41C2-A45B-CD4D125FF121Q31160832-7A4FAA4F-9859-446F-AB38-F97291C96856Q33333651-228DBA1F-E511-424F-B3A8-2ABCDDEE50A5Q33579892-938A5E68-F35C-4CF9-9070-513A60CA9BD5Q33791701-6C161518-D09F-4899-A8B1-BE074B444B98Q33830930-6E9EB7E2-4DAB-4E4E-B3CA-CE4637D9952BQ33990902-B2672AC1-A236-4839-9BBC-CACF7D589FF7Q34012471-0AAF332F-5582-4ED2-81AB-CC2355102A1DQ34328492-A55847D1-DB1C-4C27-837F-B4BFDAFDE629Q34338276-81D606E0-943F-48E5-9E21-89FB32AFEDDCQ34502803-5461EA53-7968-4A74-A543-8042FF84FD10Q34628619-0757FDD7-BAA8-4162-98D4-2226F3CE345BQ34722988-98DD6329-4DE8-41BD-954B-A9D3B4873693Q34724835-78522AD0-47B4-4012-A927-5F13B77066FAQ34742093-09ADCD1F-4786-47FA-9C4A-A903C2729D30Q34799725-FA60BC78-53F1-44B8-8A78-AFBACC99F8C2Q34911147-BF20B4C4-66ED-4E75-A690-C3A65C3BBAEDQ34935406-95E05947-2FD6-411F-A2AC-78531AF7C6DDQ35062030-853A63A1-FE44-4396-B5FF-EE7A816A9A85Q35180487-01118A17-B532-40ED-B89B-053B34675A5DQ35253556-ED3F859D-203E-4010-B6CE-8F973225C044Q35263052-7685F7F4-587E-4AED-A45B-C407F6B9E820Q35333040-7C8D94B9-7C11-4636-B445-BF9EB3CB1DA9Q35527447-07B41D0A-7161-4460-ADA4-A385F011CBEEQ35541503-241A708C-9924-4969-8037-B13B939882E1Q35646404-5D01ED0C-8F19-4884-B5F6-643D2328AC26Q35844137-56E32001-0B58-4838-9375-F276B89BBBBBQ36005353-95E09A44-FCE8-48D9-B62B-26FD739449F4Q36020028-7984AA9D-C217-427C-B84F-19C573CFC5C8Q36109869-2F03793E-4601-44B1-88B2-D38E77C7F86AQ36170847-E995E2AF-F5D0-4574-BBE3-F24F4E0A5575Q36176150-B76D0E95-396A-40B6-AFD1-50E300F35C3EQ36370228-BB1C094A-0581-4C5B-86DE-18A7A871F84AQ36404484-D2F7F32C-4B32-4BE4-A219-1FF01F681F68Q36424090-25BD8B29-2B1A-45B6-A83B-15C4BEADEF72
P2860
The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2002 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
name
The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
@ast
The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
@en
The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
@nl
type
label
The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
@ast
The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
@en
The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
@nl
prefLabel
The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
@ast
The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
@en
The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
@nl
P2093
P1476
The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
@en
P2093
David M Studdert
Eric J Thomas
Stuart R Lipsitz
Troyen A Brennan
P304
P356
10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00009
P407
P577
2002-06-01T00:00:00Z