Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials.

Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34671180

about

Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids Quantitative serial MRI of the treated fibroid uterus Low-dose dexamethasone as a treatment for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: protocol for response-adaptive randomised placebo-controlled dose-finding parallel group trial (DexFEM).The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.The menstrual bleeding questionnaire: development and validation of a comprehensive patient-reported outcome instrument for heavy menstrual bleeding.Nonsurgical management of heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review Practice patterns and attitudes about treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a national survey of obstetricians and gynecologists.A systematic review comparing hysterectomy with less-invasive treatments for abnormal uterine bleeding.Abnormal uterine bleeding, health status, and usual source of medical care: analyses using the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey A framework for crafting clinical practice guidelines that are relevant to the care and management of people with multimorbidity.Antibiotic prophylaxis for selected gynecologic surgeries.Core outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review.Radiofrequency endometrial ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding among women at high surgical risk.Predicting anatomical urological abnormalities in children who present with their first urinary tract infection.A conversation with Joseph Lau.PALM-COEIN Nomenclature for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.

P2860

Q24187109-7C1101A4-4E94-4AD5-9096-52A1EEBFBE2B Q28540610-2C48917D-C6CA-4F4A-99CC-8D1D2DEC09A4 Q30487570-CB36F1AD-3A0D-4D1C-95A8-8E5DEC1E6831 Q33877196-56CF263C-BC9B-41FC-9000-D9DB54D69CA7 Q35217566-0E88197F-2678-4F15-9F5E-213F7BD45F90 Q35551771-5B81230E-B2BC-4661-8BA6-CF51BE2BDEBD Q35552456-DB582779-0C80-48EE-A464-F149220238ED Q35719158-CA1D0B21-19B9-481C-9015-10E2AEEDFB46 Q37286946-BB86C88A-C618-4EEA-8341-347EE27AD8DB Q37663077-15BC4C3A-AFE1-43D8-B7CC-F6E5B1360A94 Q38049825-F9E03122-2BAC-4424-A95E-2A4778448190 Q38371279-0F89C3CA-C168-4135-924F-2FE01B12049B Q39183862-400A50C6-2DEB-45C4-A0FE-00B832A69D9B Q40250224-2A70B0F3-9433-4B1E-9009-2F66E52AC47F Q48037017-F58DF0CC-F7D0-4609-B512-1E467473B3CE Q48564552-3EC33D29-3CFB-4172-8868-70926D4EC913

P2860

Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34671180

description

2010 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2010 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2010 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2010年の論文

@ja

2010年論文

@yue

2010年論文

@zh-hant

2010年論文

@zh-hk

2010年論文

@zh-mo

2010年論文

@zh-tw

2010年论文

@wuu

name

Systematic review highlights d ...... ormal uterine bleeding trials.

@ast

Systematic review highlights d ...... ormal uterine bleeding trials.

@en

Systematic review highlights d ...... ormal uterine bleeding trials.

@nl

type

label

Systematic review highlights d ...... ormal uterine bleeding trials.

@ast

Systematic review highlights d ...... ormal uterine bleeding trials.

@en

Systematic review highlights d ...... ormal uterine bleeding trials.

@nl

prefLabel

Systematic review highlights d ...... ormal uterine bleeding trials.

@ast

Systematic review highlights d ...... ormal uterine bleeding trials.

@en

Systematic review highlights d ...... ormal uterine bleeding trials.

@nl

P1433

Q34671180-624D7337-9A4B-4323-9BAD-546744BC4AA1

P1476

Q34671180-A2D45760-8A98-41A2-BA5B-E4AEAF0C64AF

P2093

Q34671180-0EECC007-FF3B-4FB0-A5E1-C8B6CC78B15D

Q34671180-24630D7B-89F3-4841-8D57-3F658248AECB

Q34671180-3F206550-B352-4EDD-BFC1-32F768822DDD

Q34671180-47298812-FD4E-4FAF-8744-17C2B49FC939

Q34671180-60072427-DD2C-4D5E-857B-B63C3E8757C2

Q34671180-70F4DBC7-D39C-4A35-AEC3-8F40C18A7C85

Q34671180-73CE911D-FFBC-4573-9986-04AE40CC1E38

Q34671180-74241E1F-4D6F-4971-9CA8-B5B319CA0DDF

Q34671180-DC3F9287-9CF2-4485-9A1B-7F88EBDD6EF7

Q34671180-EC44A334-EB85-4333-AE11-C0EAC1AD8E63

P2860

Q34671180-06057FAF-DC51-41E2-ADC0-531EF747926D

Q34671180-09500343-0110-40E2-A41E-C58F85C050F5

Q34671180-0ACB3E40-5F2C-4B50-9F04-B16F7CDDFBEE

Q34671180-117C7D0D-0D23-4CB9-A68D-34178868DC5B

Q34671180-1876883C-DCCD-460A-A00E-19E060096443

Q34671180-2A6466A5-CDE7-4284-A9E7-F32DA6C3BABC

Q34671180-2CE24DAF-553C-4BF5-8BDB-CA25653357B1

Q34671180-46B4F3C5-95EB-4BBB-80AF-9554F9136570

Q34671180-5E8AA173-4958-4231-8DF3-FAA28F1D8533

Q34671180-66502CAD-C90A-4FED-8E51-C68C4ECFF2F9

P304

Q34671180-8762D220-A472-4B59-B321-718E6D2E743C

P31

Q34671180-9D0165B1-BD32-40D7-8277-DB8F0E35F806

Q34671180-cd721110-ecac-4aff-884d-3a3a69af43ba

P356

Q34671180-91EB6069-0897-449F-9191-698F540112BF

P433

Q34671180-3F670F05-A9DD-4E9F-81B2-EB3BEC56DC66

P478

Q34671180-5D07020C-88CF-4417-85C5-CAD380F47D21

P577

Q34671180-3C3289B9-E74E-4D42-877D-58DE150F409E

P5875

Q34671180-E13B2BF9-5F2D-45AB-9F51-E41579483509

P698

Q34671180-F88410EF-34E1-4895-B3BC-B7E5B3A28614

P932

Q34671180-5C1008E2-6B2B-473A-8DE8-8B085C1F658A

P356

J.JCLINEPI.2010.03.017

P1433

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

P1476

Systematic review highlights d ...... ormal uterine bleeding trials.

@en

P2093

David D Rahn

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ethan M Balk

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Husam Abed

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Joseph I Schaffer

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Katrin Uhlig

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kristen A Matteson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Matthew D Barber

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Michelle Y Morrill

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Rebecca G Rogers

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Society of Gynecologic Surgeons-Systematic Review Group

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials

Menorrhagia I: measured blood loss, clinical features, and outcome in women with heavy periods: a survey with follow-up data.

What aspects of periods are most bothersome for women reporting heavy menstrual bleeding? Community survey and qualitative study

SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions.

Making sense of ambiguity: evaluation in internal reliability and face validity of the SF 36 questionnaire in women presenting with menorrhagia.

Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.

Use of health services associated with increased menstrual loss in the United States.

Referral for menstrual problems: cross sectional survey of symptoms, reasons for referral, and management.

Can we achieve international agreement on terminologies and definitions used to describe abnormalities of menstrual bleeding?

P304

293-300

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2010.03.017

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

64

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2010-08-12T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

45639903

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

20705427

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3057176

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string