Rate of and risks for regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescents and young women.
about
A systematic review of randomized trials assessing human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screeningCervical excisional treatment of young women: a population-based studyHow to interpret the results of medical time series data analysis: Classical statistical approaches versus dynamic Bayesian network modeling.Revised terminology for cervical histopathology and its implications for management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.Cervical cytology screening among low-income, minority adolescents in New York City following the 2009 ACOG guidelinesPrediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) using HPV DNA testing after a diagnosis of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) in Catalonia, SpainHPV mRNA is more specific than HPV DNA in triage of women with minor cervical lesions.A cross sectional study of HPV type prevalence according to age and cytologyClinical application of DNA ploidy to cervical cancer screening: A review.From Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Detection to Cervical Cancer Prevention in Clinical Practice.Age-stratified 5-year risks of cervical precancer among women with enrollment and newly detected HPV infection.HPV E6/E7 RNA in situ hybridization signal patterns as biomarkers of three-tier cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade.c-myc copy number gain is a powerful prognosticator of disease outcome in cervical dysplasiaNext Generation Cancer Protection: The Bivalent HPV Vaccine for FemalesCarcinogenic HPV infection in the cervical squamo-columnar junction.Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practiceCervical carcinoma rates among young females in the United States.Serial type-specific human papillomavirus (HPV) load measurement allows differentiation between regressing cervical lesions and serial virion productive transient infections.Investigating Diagnostic Problems of CIN1 and CIN2 Associated With High-risk HPV by Combining the Novel Molecular Biomarker PanHPVE4 With P16INK4a.The detection of hTERC amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis and prognosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a case control study.Clinical Utility of Molecular Biomarkers in Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in a Young Adult Population.HPV vaccines and cancer prevention, science versus activism.Using the Cancer Risk Management Model to evaluate the health and economic impacts of cytology compared with human papillomavirus DNA testing for primary cervical cancer screening in Canada.Benchmarking CIN 3+ risk as the basis for incorporating HPV and Pap cotesting into cervical screening and management guidelines.Five-year risks of CIN 3+ and cervical cancer among women who test Pap-negative but are HPV-positive.Six-year regression and progression of cervical lesions of different human papillomavirus viral loads in varied histological diagnoses.Screening adolescents and young womenAnswering human papillomavirus vaccine concerns; a matter of science and time.Updating the natural history of human papillomavirus and anogenital cancersSee-and-Treat for High-Grade Cytology: Do Young Women Have Different Rates of High-Grade Histology?Impact of 2-, 4- and 9-valent HPV vaccines on morbidity and mortality from cervical cancerCompliance with cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus testing guidelines among insured young women.National- and state-level impact and cost-effectiveness of nonavalent HPV vaccination in the United StatesHPV 16 Is Related to the Progression of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2: A Case SeriesImpact of Age at Conization on Obstetrical Outcome: A Case-Control StudyDoes CIN2 Have the Same Aggressive Potential As CIN3? A Secondary Analysis of High-Grade Cytology Recurrence in Women Treated with Cold-Coagulation Cervical Treatment.Current recommendations for cervical cancer screening: do they render the annual pelvic examination obsolete?Exploiting biospectroscopy as a novel screening tool for cervical cancer: towards a framework to validate its accuracy in a routine clinical setting.Factors influencing decisions about surgical treatment of cervical precancerous lesions.Worldwide incidence of cervical lesions: a systematic review.
P2860
Q26824878-894ACAD3-581D-45B8-9015-1E99ADB477C9Q30407712-FC967390-6969-4E9D-A4FE-A92AB4683A9BQ31159691-09A225FD-3145-43E6-BB69-2F1BCAAE7310Q33745439-6EC32FCB-A62F-4D53-AA12-7D3F52AB4AB1Q33822258-EE64D456-0083-430E-9207-B2D11E1DF1A8Q34141990-E368FBD6-699C-4B48-AD81-9C8186905E09Q34535660-9A2B2C72-7B59-445E-96CD-766D995A3482Q34567575-4CB774B7-EDB9-41D6-A2B2-29F2B673E45DQ34657755-0259DC6F-B3F5-4F2C-96E3-0DFDB068EAE3Q34774870-22CD6C21-0B7C-44F0-8E8B-B767E452249BQ35039759-03DA4FBB-4020-4299-9D1D-94020B279DCFQ35119921-E707D5D6-52B8-4122-B9A9-3714F19E4B2CQ35176152-91E36273-67D7-4D0D-A215-C10E8D1FE8E7Q35550810-ADE6BCE2-BDDF-4DA1-86B1-D4FF81D599B8Q35688731-080D4F19-1303-4FF6-BBE0-95C43A720EC2Q35738881-B3289F55-8E5F-494F-A5FF-92CAE687BD7EQ35966730-4A0BC215-1BC1-485A-9C39-3533CD988AD6Q36023925-879EFC42-EBD9-446F-B185-C7105E918984Q36159360-65A7D1A8-4D13-402D-9A6D-A28A63B4A53CQ36360128-D3D85D1E-E18B-412C-8C3E-1D7A54E15CD5Q36404806-A36B235A-F0E7-4CA5-8CD3-2D223CDE1977Q36591743-971973A7-C22B-43F4-88D2-1CA6D0800FABQ36658811-BE195437-5FED-4BE3-829F-AFAD41A4B8F8Q36739947-C969FBA5-52F5-404A-B1CC-A6DC3828E8C8Q36740029-B69D627A-7D17-42E4-9AB4-055390DA1337Q36794559-66D50802-202D-44E0-819B-1B09E37244E7Q36903551-E192FB24-757F-4640-9DB5-43EA0FB5CE5AQ36952972-11E66F57-9010-437C-860A-D8BB82684606Q36979148-889037F4-0867-4379-8FA2-F6C91FC58669Q37037356-393F08D9-CDAC-4F67-A301-62E3EBA081E9Q37135163-14197043-72D1-4229-BC5A-76ECFFDF031EQ37135167-95F17B7C-B1BF-413C-9F4B-A16AC53BD2A7Q37173134-28F6B4A6-83D9-434B-9C93-F43566A150C0Q37403002-0F0BAC49-A817-4AEA-9BF2-E4D0AA681B57Q37722593-EBD7901F-5649-4210-8DF1-FECF3F8AC613Q37740243-281CE86F-6EAD-4A49-AD49-31A3A3D59076Q38074769-F070DF9A-A3D5-465C-A818-AFBA4006ABA9Q38158188-354E7F24-000E-47AD-A2E8-D9B7B0005276Q38190107-B2509982-428E-4690-BDB5-62CD4DC271E3Q38216073-B08EE478-F48E-4BD1-BBE1-0119942B6C23
P2860
Rate of and risks for regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescents and young women.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010 թուականի Դեկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2010 թվականի դեկտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
name
Rate of and risks for regressi ...... n adolescents and young women.
@ast
Rate of and risks for regressi ...... n adolescents and young women.
@en
Rate of and risks for regressi ...... n adolescents and young women.
@nl
type
label
Rate of and risks for regressi ...... n adolescents and young women.
@ast
Rate of and risks for regressi ...... n adolescents and young women.
@en
Rate of and risks for regressi ...... n adolescents and young women.
@nl
prefLabel
Rate of and risks for regressi ...... n adolescents and young women.
@ast
Rate of and risks for regressi ...... n adolescents and young women.
@en
Rate of and risks for regressi ...... n adolescents and young women.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Rate of and risks for regressi ...... n adolescents and young women.
@en
P2093
Adaleen Powers
Anna-Barbara Moscicki
Charles Wibbelsman
Sepideh Farhat
Stephen Shiboski
Teresa M Darragh
P2860
P304
P356
10.1097/AOG.0B013E3181FE777F
P407
P577
2010-12-01T00:00:00Z