Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.
about
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesPreferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementUse of electronic health records to support smoking cessationEnhancing the reporting and transparency of rheumatology research: a guide to reporting guidelinesA high-fiber diet does not protect against asymptomatic diverticulosisRole of Lipids in the Onset, Progression and Treatment of Periodontal Disease. A Systematic Review of Studies in HumansUsing theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic reviewThe Prevalence of Mental Disorders Among Children and Adolescents in the Child Welfare System: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisCiprofloxacin resistance in community- and hospital-acquired Escherichia coli urinary tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studiesGuidelines for reporting methodological challenges and evaluating potential bias in dementia researchAssociation between Occupational Exposure to Wood Dust and Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisBuilding resilience for future adversity: a systematic review of interventions in non-clinical samples of adultsHerpes simplex virus type 2 and HIV disease progression: a systematic review of observational studiesCortisol levels and the severity and outcomes of acute stroke: a systematic reviewA Systematic Review of Hospital-to-School Reintegration Interventions for Children and Youth with Acquired Brain InjuryPreferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementPrevalence of dry eye disease in visual display terminal workers: a systematic review and meta-analysisDisorders induced by direct occupational exposure to noise: Systematic reviewAntibioprophylaxis in Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisQualichem in vivo: a tool for assessing the quality of in vivo studies and its application for bisphenol ASTARE-HI - Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics: explanation and elaborationEpidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review.Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions.Retrospective studies of end-of-life resource utilization and costs in cancer care using health administrative data: a systematic review.Does the type of abortion provider influence contraceptive uptake after abortion? An analysis of longitudinal data from 64 health facilities in GhanaMultiple imputation for non-response when estimating HIV prevalence using survey dataIliotibial band syndrome in runners: a systematic review.Overestimates of survival after HAART: implications for global scale-up efforts[The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting of observational studies].STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement.Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections.The relationship between anti-merozoite antibodies and incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic review: surveillance for breast cancer in women treated with chest radiation for childhood, adolescent, or young adult cancer.Guidance in author instructions of hematology and oncology journals: A cross sectional and longitudinal study.Registration of observational studies: is it time?The impact of the inpatient practice of continuous deep sedation until death on healthcare professionals' emotional well-being: a systematic review.Frequency of persistent tooth pain after root canal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Thiazolidinedione use and the longitudinal risk of fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitusFace validity of the single work ability item: comparison with objectively measured heart rate reserve over several days.Immune phenotype predicts risk for posttransplantation squamous cell carcinoma.
P2860
Q21092368-669D20CA-285C-4017-B774-4717F9CD1E00Q21562278-0C87BE2A-F462-48FF-92FF-382A37E20C1AQ24235188-1B5ED045-9CFF-42FA-849E-F3038DB963EDQ24288897-66EEF337-18AA-49BF-A284-146C562790C6Q24595057-07E8B7DF-304A-45A6-B98F-1E9D7C4ACEDBQ26741316-59D9744D-90E6-4CC6-8F14-745B04D0058AQ26751446-12EC4094-9999-47F5-BE75-4A5976B8140CQ26765149-B9483305-486A-4BF9-87A0-DB2010AC993FQ26775453-86675733-67D7-4EB7-AB35-991C7EC37DC1Q26781852-8F90741C-1903-44C2-8650-8A973AD3F744Q26801836-311CE4E7-3EB9-4EFF-AB26-485F8AEC2A03Q26823730-25423A20-DC58-4B2B-8E2E-9802D95767BAQ26861777-75C6E8A0-A9CF-463A-BB77-08A30087DB4CQ26864822-E1FC97EF-421A-42E7-8D2B-D9AAA7FF13FAQ26864890-160969AE-FBBD-4341-944B-919436C893E7Q27860868-D00673DE-5B77-4D86-AFF8-FDC213344287Q28073073-F444CEDF-6224-4576-9240-8B1B8B03DFC9Q28075487-87054AAD-57D5-4FEF-B599-37CCEBBE2D02Q28276112-C5F34751-DC76-4AD1-A5E9-D7FF4D06E290Q28539319-C9F6CE10-70D7-4972-B3F2-FFC13309078CQ28673321-5E04E2D9-7C63-4250-99DB-FBE41EA2D15DQ30235265-03FC70A7-3C53-4665-8EA9-7B65996DEB12Q30484925-50911CAE-DC1F-4425-AACB-B7E2C10940CAQ30827101-E859F939-BC1D-45F5-8753-AF1B0B08EC27Q30976185-96122F38-70F0-4B86-B748-9DF1205BE911Q31007076-6ED6A7B2-7BB5-4E39-BEA4-95D951AD9653Q31096301-E360996D-D9AF-427B-A541-2B06D64EB45FQ33322531-A480B105-184F-4BF9-BE1D-DBD8DED5E0B1Q33338796-943D37BE-21F4-4051-B699-81BF62DEA62AQ33405556-B12DBA03-893A-49E5-BABC-87F6994835A0Q33506761-75D42874-D04D-45AF-B294-4CECC0A7C5E5Q33526349-56223A11-48A2-425D-949A-7A15BDAD20E4Q33549627-06266856-42B0-4DE4-B911-FA64D98C6FE6Q33614639-F04EA718-209A-4153-8E5D-828A18853F61Q33636327-8A943204-F7E7-4FBE-9387-719ECB0EEBE4Q33651385-8FED08DB-2122-4817-80EB-A0CD22BCFCE1Q33706308-3B4993E2-7A3F-4738-9F6D-9ADC4588338EQ33736122-CC9035BC-7151-4E70-A36B-139F3DE89BD3Q33742359-EFB2E9F1-4A1B-4D3E-B438-0F946D54C57AQ33748547-516A9764-75F6-4F91-BA91-F173F8862B01
P2860
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2007 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
name
Strengthening the Reporting of ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@ast
Strengthening the Reporting of ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@en
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
@nl
type
label
Strengthening the Reporting of ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@ast
Strengthening the Reporting of ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@en
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
@nl
prefLabel
Strengthening the Reporting of ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@ast
Strengthening the Reporting of ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@en
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
@nl
P2093
P50
P1476
Strengthening the Reporting of ...... : explanation and elaboration.
@en
P2093
Charles Poole
Cynthia D Mulrow
James J Schlesselman
Jan P Vandenbroucke
Matthias Egger
STROBE initiative
Stuart J Pocock
P304
P356
10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-W1
P407
P577
2007-10-01T00:00:00Z