The evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test.
about
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsDecision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsDecision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsWhat is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsProstate cancer screening practices and beliefsApplying strategies from libertarian paternalism to decision making for prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening.The development of a web- and a print-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening.A computer-tailored intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among African American men.Evaluation of educational videos to increase skin cancer risk awareness and sun-safe behaviors among adult Hispanics.Helping men make an informed decision about prostate cancer screening: a pilot study of telephone counselingPerceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worryPerceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey.Predictors of perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: sociodemographic factors and mass media exposures.Patient education for informed decision making about prostate cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-upRandomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences, and behaviorsDo men make informed decisions about prostate cancer screening? Baseline results from the "take the wheel" trialA randomized trial of a computer-tailored decision aid to improve prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the Take the Wheel trialHow should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.A randomized controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen testA Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial for PSA Screening Decision Support Interventions in Two Primary Care Settings.How physicians approach prostate cancer screening before and after losing a lawsuitPatient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision makingHealth perceptions in patients who undergo screening and workup for prostate cancerPart 2: Patient information, informed decision-making and the psycho-social impact of prostate-specific antigen testing.Information on pros and cons of prostate-specific antigen testing to men prior to blood draw: a study from the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden.Informed decision making about prostate cancer testing in predominantly immigrant black men: a randomized controlled trial.Shared decision-making in the selection of outpatient analgesics for older individuals in the emergency department.Shared decision making in the medical encounter: are we all talking about the same thing?Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions.National evidence on the use of shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen screening.Applicability of a video intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate-specific antigen testing.PSA-based prostate cancer screening: the role of active surveillance and informed and shared decision making.The global role of health care delivery science: learning from variation to build health systems that avoid waste and harm.An evaluation of two decision-making scales for children with life-limiting illnesses.Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates.Conducting implementation research in community-based primary care: a qualitative study on integrating patient decision support interventions for cancer screening into routine practice.Who uses decision aids? Subgroup analyses from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial of two prostate cancer screening decision support interventions.Jordanian Physicians' Attitudes toward Disclosure of Cancer Information and Patient Participation in Treatment Decision-making
P2860
Q24200969-7B05E9D6-8BB9-4EA9-B9FC-5F325D368070Q24235817-7EE3D017-A958-486E-A1A2-C62F3907A578Q24239885-D8094BFF-2CA3-4175-AD4E-148673492DAEQ26822925-627662CC-F4FF-4D7F-8076-7ED5564C6A80Q29994603-FE0629D0-971D-4ABF-A14D-B1A8FB299D4CQ30309005-B8CC909A-E42D-4B39-A47D-078AFDFD2324Q30402074-D015A06D-68C4-4421-A676-60B919269CC7Q30493869-7BDA7C81-943A-4547-9AC4-C250D6054357Q33796424-62F45C07-E8CF-4661-87CC-E29A35C88AEEQ34062084-6497357F-CA36-4901-B975-FAE3358681BEQ34267863-80CB6EF4-A826-4941-AF79-791860AE06B8Q34324409-DC5AC085-0093-4ADC-B5F1-5D68AB345822Q34344856-7EB09849-75E4-47EC-842B-EDA114FF0389Q34393575-B263E7DB-891D-4968-8C5D-D5AF22BF196BQ34628065-09A7E590-0099-4AA4-9DE8-C2109F81735DQ34733392-38E82AC9-3152-4CE5-B2AD-A5E6EDB9CC37Q35282349-8E0D6788-8460-41C2-9D4A-518CD8926E9CQ35285033-7DBBFD44-F989-401C-958E-91AD6BB73CF8Q35429513-2620C1DC-A027-478B-9710-2D8529051609Q35548293-C078BC7F-6259-4664-A1BD-1AFF1E52BDB6Q35638183-F82AB18F-A2A2-4D74-B802-87D9843D9F0FQ35721892-B322A9A9-D9AC-4ECE-BC74-4343CDF10B5EQ35721908-5F8FABC6-3C23-4F91-B835-8BEAD2AA80D0Q35792722-C100E8CA-8C66-41E6-B2E8-860313C85829Q36103676-F4CD1D26-CB5D-4E39-AD9E-7EA34629D8DDQ36353239-2BF372AA-F0EA-486A-8450-E613D514C2AAQ36406693-78ABE82F-10B1-4747-9C21-517CAF2A7D96Q36849902-2261D5E4-267A-4636-B9DA-69A5D645890AQ36943289-613691AF-6386-432E-848B-30E18E35EDB0Q36943292-15FA9613-0297-447F-9495-DCB35D0EFD36Q36943296-94707EA0-8B52-4B3E-82DB-DCB772486E6FQ36992262-C87571C8-5193-45DA-9631-56045F971090Q37014636-9B6AAB92-6B7F-4AA1-B14B-142AB4B8C4DCQ37084366-9C0425EA-306E-4D9F-9E63-780B12B2AC20Q37097208-3BE77BDD-DB80-4545-9E7C-97D8026B4140Q37261229-456DB409-E088-47FF-9C9E-F5B0043D3829Q37314726-6E205E2E-3E10-4C0B-BB06-D26964CB302CQ37325539-FB62268D-0255-4D1A-9E87-C5A621C7C7E5Q37332024-A0BCDA97-545D-4F89-905B-4D96434209D8Q37441005-A258D58C-8003-48E8-95E8-EF1BB7190F00
P2860
The evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test.
description
2001 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2001 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2001 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2001年の論文
@ja
2001年論文
@yue
2001年論文
@zh-hant
2001年論文
@zh-hk
2001年論文
@zh-mo
2001年論文
@zh-tw
2001年论文
@wuu
name
The evaluation of two methods ...... rostate-specific antigen test.
@ast
The evaluation of two methods ...... rostate-specific antigen test.
@en
The evaluation of two methods ...... rostate-specific antigen test.
@nl
type
label
The evaluation of two methods ...... rostate-specific antigen test.
@ast
The evaluation of two methods ...... rostate-specific antigen test.
@en
The evaluation of two methods ...... rostate-specific antigen test.
@nl
prefLabel
The evaluation of two methods ...... rostate-specific antigen test.
@ast
The evaluation of two methods ...... rostate-specific antigen test.
@en
The evaluation of two methods ...... rostate-specific antigen test.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
The evaluation of two methods ...... rostate-specific antigen test.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1046/J.1525-1497.2001.016006391.X
P577
2001-06-01T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1046523779