Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.
about
Identification of abnormal screening mammogram interpretation using Medicare claims data.Probabilistic computer model developed from clinical data in national mammography database format to classify mammographic findings.Interpretation of positron emission mammography and MRI by experienced breast imaging radiologists: performance and observer reproducibilityAnalysis of Participant Factors That Affect the Diagnostic Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography.A new and fast image feature selection method for developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme.Reduction of false-positive recalls using a computerized mammographic image feature analysis schemeAssociation between computed tissue density asymmetry in bilateral mammograms and near-term breast cancer riskOptimization of breast mass classification using sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) and a support vector machine (SVM) model.Observer Variability of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Lexicon for Mammography.Optimal Breast Biopsy Decision-Making Based on Mammographic Features and Demographic Factors.Quality control in neuroradiology: impact of trainees on discrepancy ratesComputerized prediction of risk for developing breast cancer based on bilateral mammographic breast tissue asymmetry.Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammographyMammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practiceDisparities in screening mammography services by race/ethnicity and health insuranceImproving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.Assessment of performance and reproducibility of applying a content-based image retrieval scheme for classification of breast lesionsBilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment.An interactive system for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses.Performance of a subsidised mammographic screening programme in Malaysia, a middle-income Asian country.The Influence of Radiology Image Consultation in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer Patients.Initiative to Improve Mammogram Interpretation.Logistic LASSO regression for the diagnosis of breast cancer using clinical demographic data and the BI-RADS lexicon for ultrasonography.Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions.Interactive dedicated training curriculum improves accuracy in the interpretation of MR imaging of prostate cancer.Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.Diagnostic mammography: identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria.Potentially missed detection with screening mammography: does the quality of radiologist's interpretation vary by patient socioeconomic advantage/disadvantage?Artificial neural networks in mammography interpretation and diagnostic decision makingVariable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions.Statistical approaches for modeling radiologists' interpretive performance.Performance of diagnostic mammography differs in the United States and DenmarkA logistic regression model based on the national mammography database format to aid breast cancer diagnosis.Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway.Investigating the link between radiologists' gaze, diagnostic decision, and image content.Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.Radiology diagnostic exchange agents: clinical term identification and validation.Prediction of near-term breast cancer risk based on bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry.
P2860
Q30833965-939ED770-C549-439D-A409-9CECD5564A3FQ33430221-E7B070E2-1EB9-4FB3-B361-7D2706CAC579Q33654503-28757C09-67EC-43F8-9C0E-8067A91985A0Q33736316-780594D7-5B75-4FB6-B9E9-CB2007BD89B0Q33807163-6EE79CF8-4801-483F-B3C9-F02D479D87B8Q33929863-835368E1-6F95-4CAA-8697-C4AD785ACAAAQ33988820-3831D4DE-7EB7-47BA-BF11-626A4452CAB0Q34053289-6311649A-AEF5-4637-B7BA-A1501CD86BA2Q34250494-AC70B6EE-4E2C-4395-A477-E490A6AF1202Q34278769-BECE6D18-3534-4C3D-B354-5F85566EF3DDQ34670103-A7F75284-2F09-4603-8BC2-EF545F4EBBEEQ35111978-D9634D85-4AFE-41BC-84F5-6384DC7E5659Q35115892-3AD17A08-74BA-4D89-A694-00AE92CE0334Q35131036-3EF61F1C-0B63-443F-AE87-AC59D822186DQ35629889-07C4DFA4-3583-4F1A-9BC6-EC099090C13EQ35721756-AF118F79-B409-4303-A305-4F9EA290F215Q35742550-FE9EA87E-FFEC-48EC-8C89-2DE1E8A565BFQ35761829-FE7388A6-64BB-4032-BDA7-830FFC4DA80CQ36199030-3F7AD519-0131-42AA-8DAF-0A23A0E74FCDQ36247561-1CA500D2-09D9-4D3D-90B1-2BA81F3B7278Q36262898-784DFF97-F94A-4F0F-A3A5-8DBD440AE08EQ36288379-DC55A36A-18AA-4E1E-B74D-858B4A1E3417Q36403020-7C8D3971-0E36-49D3-B8B2-55F1852C95C7Q36406593-16760D86-8AF0-4D0D-8F3A-CE8891C96547Q36484992-889D3350-7AD6-45B0-8448-6F4E9467B376Q36721080-2AD95063-950C-4891-83D6-B2393895C8C3Q36726371-DACB547E-3401-4717-A8EC-FD76C82F585BQ36785608-145A6D4A-4736-4FCB-A4F0-E947365243EAQ36787907-32777107-BADD-46C6-8A6B-432EDD46AB29Q36916009-FD7F0494-3D46-4477-9A82-808B25FC4A6CQ36955146-9B5051F0-78AA-410F-AF56-5F86D1F6415CQ37122048-2CEA24B9-985E-402F-9D86-561A9691F33DQ37128239-A2C1B80A-35FF-4A21-B49B-4897B3DB26ADQ37140708-84BA1D87-5718-40BF-B57C-CF1C450C7A39Q37211022-5E5AE29A-B17C-4B56-8BD1-D5B0BE38CE3DQ37288821-695FF1F8-738C-4059-8F89-CD6F3004EAD0Q37292731-21BCB87E-374E-4809-87A4-6DC0B7D7A974Q37342501-6ACAD667-141C-45D6-B982-1C225F283372Q37354371-FCC9E977-9400-4BC8-B9F3-6805C33D5BC2Q37375608-031C7DE4-D20B-442D-AFDF-BF17FD68CEC7
P2860
Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2002 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
name
Performance parameters for scr ...... list and general radiologists.
@ast
Performance parameters for scr ...... list and general radiologists.
@en
Performance parameters for scr ...... list and general radiologists.
@nl
type
label
Performance parameters for scr ...... list and general radiologists.
@ast
Performance parameters for scr ...... list and general radiologists.
@en
Performance parameters for scr ...... list and general radiologists.
@nl
prefLabel
Performance parameters for scr ...... list and general radiologists.
@ast
Performance parameters for scr ...... list and general radiologists.
@en
Performance parameters for scr ...... list and general radiologists.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Performance parameters for scr ...... list and general radiologists.
@en
P2093
Dulcy E Wolverton
Edward A Sickles
Katherine E Dee
P304
P356
10.1148/RADIOL.2243011482
P407
P577
2002-09-01T00:00:00Z