Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.
about
A scale invariant clustering of genes on human chromosome 7Integrated taxonomy: traditional approach and DNA barcoding for the identification of filarioid worms and related parasites (Nematoda)De novo genome sequencing and comparative genomics of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera)Genomic deletions and precise removal of transposable elements mediated by short identical DNA segments in primatesIndel-based evolutionary distance and mouse-human divergenceEvolution of a distinct genomic domain in Drosophila: comparative analysis of the dot chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilisThe InDeVal insertion/deletion evaluation tool: a program for finding target regions in DNA sequences and for aiding in sequence comparisonComparative primate genomics: emerging patterns of genome content and dynamicsGeneral continuous-time Markov model of sequence evolution via insertions/deletions: local alignment probability computation.General continuous-time Markov model of sequence evolution via insertions/deletions: are alignment probabilities factorable?Intron evolution: testing hypotheses of intron evolution using the phylogenomics of tetraspaninsDo echinoderm genomes measure up?Genome-wide influence of indel Substitutions on evolution of bacteria of the PVC superphylum, revealed using a novel computational methodImpacts of low coverage depths and post-mortem DNA damage on variant calling: a simulation studyFine-scale signatures of molecular evolution reconcile models of indel-associated mutationAnalysis of complete nucleotide sequences of 12 Gossypium chloroplast genomes: origin and evolution of allotetraploidsA basal deuterostome genome viewed as a natural experimentAnalysis of the role of retrotransposition in gene evolution in vertebratesAnalysis of the genome-wide variations among multiple strains of the plant pathogenic bacterium Xylella fastidiosaGenomic divergences among cattle, dog and human estimated from large-scale alignments of genomic sequencesDeveloping market class specific InDel markers from next generation sequence data in Phaseolus vulgaris L.An evolutionary constraint: strongly disfavored class of change in DNA sequence during divergence of cis-regulatory modules.DNA indels in coding regions reveal selective constraints on protein evolution in the human lineage.A macaque's-eye view of human insertions and deletions: differences in mechanisms.High divergence in primate-specific duplicated regions: human and chimpanzee chorionic gonadotropin beta genesPrimate-specific spliced PMCHL RNAs are non-protein coding in human and macaque tissues.Genome and gene alterations by insertions and deletions in the evolution of human and chimpanzee chromosome 22.Insertion and deletion processes in recent human history.Evolutionary analysis of the well characterized endo16 promoter reveals substantial variation within functional sites.Thirteen Camellia chloroplast genome sequences determined by high-throughput sequencing: genome structure and phylogenetic relationships.In transition: primate genomics at a time of rapid change.Genetic analysis and molecular characterization of Chinese sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) cultivars using insertion-deletion (InDel) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers.Insertions, deletions, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms at rare restriction enzyme sites enhance discriminatory power of polymorphic amplified typing sequences, a novel strain typing system for Escherichia coli O157:H7INDELible: a flexible simulator of biological sequence evolutionDevelopment of genetic markers in Eucalyptus species by target enrichment and exome sequencingNature and distribution of large sequence polymorphisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeIndelFR: a database of indels in protein structures and their flanking regionsComplete Plastid Genome Sequencing of Four Tilia Species (Malvaceae): A Comparative Analysis and Phylogenetic ImplicationsGenomic disorders: genome architecture results in susceptibility to DNA rearrangements causing common human traits.The genomic landscape of short insertion and deletion polymorphisms in the chicken (Gallus gallus) Genome: a high frequency of deletions in tandem duplicates.
P2860
Q21283982-4455050D-4AE2-4A41-8F6A-6451F6AA8498Q21558541-72488F81-A65B-444D-9157-355C441CC298Q22122118-7C19914A-C386-4CFE-8E06-C1D662B659DBQ24531797-2A6D0222-FAC9-4879-A452-1B53340BB1C7Q24564229-C11DB23C-27AC-45E5-A3A1-89E3AB704792Q24628063-91B93193-CE3E-4E68-8C68-963EC5D34F93Q24794364-D02CF75B-E398-4FBF-9681-3D30F011CB51Q27006713-A819AF39-F601-4A24-B997-2A81494F6874Q27318718-E4A95898-8694-47ED-BA2A-CC7E6D9354BEQ27318818-5BB0101F-A929-4D7C-A4B1-C417DBC2BCD3Q27351922-C9A3FDC4-23BC-4EF4-A328-053267111C64Q28080821-2FBEA298-BD3A-4BC0-8985-E36A95B7C086Q28297624-B91734A3-DAEF-488D-B2B4-A445FC56900BQ28650823-3B19210F-BDE8-4014-8DA4-918FC41D52C9Q28681872-40D35249-5E82-4763-8F84-D10E4A32B471Q28728594-4EF54FB7-1B83-4579-8B22-8707D52D2BD7Q28755942-13C46E3B-373D-4025-8B43-49C5500BA2C3Q28756796-56AC02D6-808E-46FD-AA4D-BB0D283B43C0Q28767438-7F488BF3-A013-4DF2-AC8C-5ADAE75F4CF6Q30477703-143A8207-FEC8-4A19-9D20-EBE1CDB38CBAQ30826702-6C4D518E-F2B2-4C3E-B582-93AA3FD2021BQ33221336-5B638877-32DE-4F91-BFBE-2013B56C1B34Q33302559-7193643A-6F61-493B-ABC3-878548CA09D3Q33302934-6FA5D712-299D-4F53-AFAA-1E0E7716F636Q33349625-AB9A80A0-DAC2-42A6-B845-D7D9CEAED8B1Q33391575-8642F061-116D-454D-A6BE-E3AA6AD6890CQ33403093-F592AA88-DD9F-42E6-9763-671BDF6C156BQ33526355-E54E11BF-CE6C-42E4-A5FF-6764F79B73F9Q33853841-5EE3DF21-98A0-43F1-ABC7-1270AD0C49E6Q33926814-37B61385-C6C3-4853-AB5B-76D84B074330Q34381428-47A2CF4F-1B88-4E0B-A2E4-83EB12EEF104Q34525657-27941889-464E-402A-9F1C-0D41AB88DFF5Q34782078-FBB9DE15-627F-4467-9E46-FF814EF5B5B9Q34979731-646638B2-E5CD-4191-8E82-CB468118CB2DQ34989518-B32F6983-2E26-48D8-85D0-788F12D87F5AQ35585075-F9F7C9AD-CB8D-404F-BA03-20BF05384FEFQ35630717-E4D98ACF-46B8-42BC-81EE-41CDFD18BB54Q35840977-946C5CFF-7800-4420-8755-D66EB7212068Q35875197-755B4888-1B48-4BC5-A19B-9DCCD950A91DQ35910944-D6170F9C-ECF9-441F-818F-B404A191A592
P2860
Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2003 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
name
Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.
@ast
Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.
@en
Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.
@nl
type
label
Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.
@ast
Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.
@en
Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.
@nl
prefLabel
Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.
@ast
Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.
@en
Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.
@en
P2093
John Williams
R Andrew Cameron
Roy J Britten
P2860
P304
P356
10.1073/PNAS.0330964100
P407
P577
2003-04-02T00:00:00Z