Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
about
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventionsInterventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and cliniciansInterventions to improve the use of systematic reviews for clinical and commissioning decision-makingQuality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic reviewOverview of systematic reviews - a new type of study. Part IIInfluence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological studyDoes preoperative physiotherapy improve postoperative, patient-based outcomes in older adults who have undergone total knee arthroplasty? A systematic reviewThe evidence base for interventions delivered to children in primary care: an overview of cochrane systematic reviewsThe impact of Cochrane Systematic Reviews: a mixed method evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the UK National Institute for Health ResearchThe Effect of Music on the Spirituality of Patients: A Systematic Review.What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study.Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological surveyIdentifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study.Geographical representativeness of published and ongoing randomized controlled trials. The example of: Tobacco consumption and HIV infection.Cochrane systematic reviews of Chinese herbal medicines: an overview.Identifying items to assess methodological quality in physical therapy trials: a factor analysisRating the quality of trials in systematic reviews of physical therapy interventions.An evaluation of epidemiological and reporting characteristics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) systematic reviews (SRs).Quantifying bias in randomized controlled trials in child health: a meta-epidemiological study.Compared with what? An analysis of control-group types in Cochrane and Campbell reviews of psychosocial treatment efficacy with substance use disordersHow do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study.Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review.Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authorsMethodological quality of meta-analyses: matched-pairs comparison over time and between industry-sponsored and academic-sponsored reports.Comprehensive computer searches and reporting in systematic reviews.Systematic Differences between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Meta-Analyses on the Same Topic: A Matched Pair Analysis.Are child-centric aspects in newborn and child health systematic review and meta-analysis protocols and reports adequately reported?-two systematic reviews.Lifestyle factors in hypertension drug research: systematic analysis of articles in a leading cochrane reportCoverage of mental health and substance misuse topics in the Cochrane review system.Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews.Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.Methodological quality, completeness of reporting and use of systematic reviews as evidence in clinical practice guidelines for paediatric overweight and obesity.Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four-item checklist.Impact of single centre status on estimates of intervention effects in trials with continuous outcomes: meta-epidemiological study.Clinical trials in sports physiotherapy. Building on five decades of research to produce even better trials: a critical review and tips for improvements.Bibliometric analysis of articles published from 1980 to 2009 in Physical Therapy, journal of the American Physical Therapy Association.Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Postoperative Pain in Children: Comparison Against the Recommended Core Outcome Set.Role of Cochrane Reviews in informing US private payers' policies.Probiotics and gastrointestinal conditions: An overview of evidence from the Cochrane Collaboration.
P2860
Q24193207-3D72F29A-EDD8-40FA-90A9-98E578AC0213Q24200884-982E75A5-F788-4573-B7FE-5E77E22BB7FBQ24236689-B7C172A0-5A8F-430A-87EC-823092DCA788Q26828986-2FE28968-B0F6-4E0B-BA94-0FE616A570F2Q26862742-CB336B40-CFB9-494B-90E5-C8E8440EF3CAQ27687577-126A493C-8948-41E0-AB49-E269ECC7BE9FQ28279099-8B5AEADA-6B4C-49D3-91E6-F007D89B467AQ28476394-4BB101F2-00E4-40EC-9CF2-A979BB06E7BDQ28651730-7886D6E7-581F-4B6E-95B9-BCE9120D8325Q30402806-0CDE3E66-FA12-471C-9825-7B023B2A4B04Q30828711-CDFC497D-770A-43BF-8E7C-75047C60E1ABQ30871934-1E35D841-422A-4EB3-A1B7-20C6585661B9Q30999735-0379AE99-9F07-4714-A86D-0CA1E49E9A82Q33814405-C72F308F-92E5-49FA-8576-70D089A2C077Q33828691-441F80C0-9A95-4EE5-BE62-1A63A913996CQ34103290-D695DB92-94C5-460D-A36E-BDA720B77FBCQ34135659-23147DBC-82E0-496C-B67C-1938CA5B8818Q34136795-9028D231-51A1-484B-9DB7-6BCAF05D1F00Q34558486-753FAEEA-5160-4165-B4B7-FB14939A2FDAQ35088375-6289D6CB-EA6F-41B8-86ED-9D1C90FACAAFQ35218781-6BB167D6-A8E5-44A4-9626-147459C5FACAQ35496622-7D9F88CB-EA37-4E59-9191-2D4D46B6183DQ35586847-BE64ACDB-3974-451E-B85B-3D425B61005DQ35621524-73F12796-1D6F-43B4-B475-8D02ECF0373FQ35656915-156AA5A3-57E4-4B63-931C-CB232EF5C7C0Q35659929-47D20995-5D88-4A59-9802-D9A03978D728Q35869658-6AEC8345-B99A-4450-B232-06CABEB06610Q36297521-08A600D7-8320-481E-981F-F16394FBA243Q37616383-53511C6A-07D3-4668-A966-3F727EA3DBE5Q38054286-6C8728D7-CDF7-4C8E-95C2-A26C939EB87CQ38206295-BF9DB5A4-C8EC-4700-8A48-093E69900301Q38673534-3F1D81B7-2E22-4C3A-A85A-F49F0F010DFCQ38767084-FF192B4F-5E74-4102-AB4C-5B82D1194DC9Q39027809-B0C02A8C-FD83-4920-9B9E-485A371589C2Q41111726-E490FC83-5CA6-47A6-9442-028DA210AFBBQ44421844-69E26807-2405-4F8F-AE26-C13EB1803421Q45048664-EE321588-BCF8-4D96-ABD8-ED7350F3654DQ47649967-E80FF196-FD22-4E2B-BA2B-E5E4E1D3D1EFQ49376570-0E602FC5-E688-4CDF-AE90-2A84FCD4C2B0Q50224112-89E6702C-3256-47BB-9E82-DBD87F73BC1C
P2860
Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2009 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
name
Cochrane reviews used more rig ...... atic reviews in physiotherapy.
@ast
Cochrane reviews used more rig ...... atic reviews in physiotherapy.
@en
Cochrane reviews used more rig ...... atic reviews in physiotherapy.
@nl
type
label
Cochrane reviews used more rig ...... atic reviews in physiotherapy.
@ast
Cochrane reviews used more rig ...... atic reviews in physiotherapy.
@en
Cochrane reviews used more rig ...... atic reviews in physiotherapy.
@nl
prefLabel
Cochrane reviews used more rig ...... atic reviews in physiotherapy.
@ast
Cochrane reviews used more rig ...... atic reviews in physiotherapy.
@en
Cochrane reviews used more rig ...... atic reviews in physiotherapy.
@nl
P50
P1476
Cochrane reviews used more rig ...... matic reviews in physiotherapy
@en
P2093
Anne M Moseley
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2008.09.018
P577
2009-03-17T00:00:00Z