Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34984432

about

Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline.In search of a tolerance-induction strategy for cow's milk allergies: significant reduction of beta-lactoglobulin allergenicity via transglutaminase/cysteine polymerization WSES Guidelines for the management of acute left sided colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments WSES guidelines for management of Clostridium difficile infection in surgical patients Exercise and BMI in Overweight and Obese Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Trial Sequential Meta-Analysis.2015 recommendations for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica: a European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology collaborative initiative Executive Summary: 2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis in Adults Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: report of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel NHF-McMaster Guideline on Care Models for Haemophilia Management.2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Evaluating diagnostic tests.The CONSENSUS study: protocol for a mixed methods study to establish which outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for oropharyngeal cancer.Evidence-informed recommendations for rehabilitation with older adults living with HIV: a knowledge synthesis Management of bleeding following major trauma: an updated European guideline.WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias.2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.2015 Recommendations for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica: a European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology collaborative initiative.WSES consensus conference: Guidelines for first-line management of intra-abdominal infections.World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines for management of skin and soft tissue infections The efficacy and safety of cilostazol for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke in acute and chronic phases in Asian population--an updated meta-analysis.Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study.A survey of FDG- and amyloid-PET imaging in dementia and GRADE analysis DRACMA one year after: which changes have occurred in diagnosis and treatment of CMA in Italy?(18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer patients: study protocol for a multicentre, diagnostic test accuracy study Manual examination in the diagnosis of cervicogenic headache: a systematic literature review.Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on pancreatic cancer: a PRISMA-compliant article.Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations Diagnostic performance of imaging modalities in chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Patients at Increased Risk for Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.An Ontology for Telemedicine Systems Resiliency to Technological Context Variations in Pervasive Healthcare World Allergy Organization-McMaster University Guidelines for Allergic Disease Prevention (GLAD-P): Vitamin D.Guidelines for guideline developers: a systematic review of grading systems for medical tests Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment.Barriers to making recommendations about medical tests: a qualitative study of European guideline developers A comparison of conservative interventions and their effectiveness for coccydynia: a systematic review.Efficacy and safety of iguratimod for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Systematic review of the accuracy of antibody tests used to screen asymptomatic adults for hepatitis C infection.Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist Radiological diagnosis of periapical bone tissue lesions in endodontics: a systematic review.

P2860

Q21092902-B7EA8C41-6F55-4436-BEBD-2BC1F4209A2C Q24633242-1B632FE0-B3AA-451C-B635-67F5E53B86B0 Q26740358-95DEA16E-7C69-468E-9A9B-5BEDD2D30172 Q26783025-65FED87F-F689-4115-A89B-A74BB67AE6E0 Q26795429-508EB3BF-31F3-4CFF-BA3B-F279D6848EFB Q26826957-EE906904-6E8A-429E-8B01-48D926A4A3C9 Q28081356-23E30C6F-6911-4A26-A3D2-DB12AD323EA5 Q28083622-A7BB192E-DCB0-46A1-BDFF-4BDA22B80E19 Q28300001-EAF969A5-2484-42D6-9D20-21305B3C7636 Q30249305-2782C44C-AD69-45AB-A8D5-92059C577864 Q30367068-6481EE3A-2E8C-45CF-B085-2C63CCC5B3F7 Q30387061-8BEB1A43-B800-4A75-8ECD-7FED7F59977F Q33621888-A54B1829-4F23-4087-BDAD-F8F4F7406B01 Q33626077-76B505A1-364B-43E0-AF27-9D508881AAAC Q33919178-B263F7FF-3095-4304-8C28-C1DBDF2A80A9 Q34248734-B7201A7F-125E-44BA-A6A9-050C31D5363E Q34321150-F76F0F1D-0B0E-4E92-9E7A-7A1A75703F21 Q34493588-7D2A59E0-954B-49E7-A480-48FF45CA776D Q34541183-381D34AB-DA22-4D94-97C6-9806FC53070A Q34565950-BF28241F-3C14-4A74-86FC-18C862F25110 Q34995043-23405C16-C035-40F6-B363-4C2035027B97 Q35109418-EB250DD9-D458-4598-84E5-47E247485053 Q35158547-8E73B8DF-12E7-44A6-B4F2-7C715A1A1AFD Q35576605-332A402A-DD40-4E90-9227-5B7C512E72C4 Q35890956-B7622210-8F39-4FB1-9F96-026299DA176F Q35936650-BCB85084-51CF-42B1-AD05-FA8D497A0E3C Q36009104-5D8D1629-34D2-4BD5-9A75-908DB3361FF3 Q36217828-97C17755-6EC9-4219-80FA-49E7A15A1893 Q36263061-3A03FA50-D516-42D7-87E6-2FBFA09EAAA3 Q36409308-0BF16CF3-0AF6-4FCD-A321-7BCDC0CD28F9 Q36844521-FD1B8949-E6EE-4174-B259-BE88ED0131CA Q36907237-7785F3BE-B1E7-484B-B552-1B4AEA490033 Q37028486-3948C189-0027-4154-83EA-A48623C92094 Q37101470-E6D0ADEA-376C-4E9E-8BC5-F799B37EE2AE Q37271449-B9FC9D78-8620-4C67-88A9-E6F49763A7CC Q37293318-8745DBF6-5BE0-48B3-A31B-338F0109DBA5 Q37382449-6069231A-7C63-4162-9DAE-35E19068B087 Q37521078-9DB5D4E0-80B4-4C95-94EC-C846547D2CC4 Q37898046-27DAEF6F-E8F5-4E1F-B013-FD3249EFB3AA Q37994809-55AD184F-6C89-421B-A994-E81A6DD2ABCF

P2860

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34984432

description

2009 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2009 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2009 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2009年の論文

@ja

2009年学术文章

@wuu

2009年学术文章

@zh-cn

2009年学术文章

@zh-hans

2009年学术文章

@zh-my

2009年学术文章

@zh-sg

2009年學術文章

@yue

name

Grading quality of evidence an ...... agnostic tests and strategies.

@ast

Grading quality of evidence an ...... agnostic tests and strategies.

@en

Grading quality of evidence an ...... agnostic tests and strategies.

@nl

type

label

Grading quality of evidence an ...... agnostic tests and strategies.

@ast

Grading quality of evidence an ...... agnostic tests and strategies.

@en

Grading quality of evidence an ...... agnostic tests and strategies.

@nl

prefLabel

Grading quality of evidence an ...... agnostic tests and strategies.

@ast

Grading quality of evidence an ...... agnostic tests and strategies.

@en

Grading quality of evidence an ...... agnostic tests and strategies.

@nl

P1433

Q34984432-6F8C2ABD-B7B7-4627-88A0-C83857AB2DDE

P1476

Q34984432-B258880F-0AA4-4A41-94DD-52F5AF240A9C

P2093

Q34984432-1B510052-C92E-43CE-87DA-BDC66F0871D4

Q34984432-212AF843-B571-4838-A6DC-B9C3577AAFB5

Q34984432-21BF2A89-45FA-4549-8795-C1B0716C3DDA

Q34984432-314AE89F-8A83-4BF6-914B-BCA6B0368DC2

Q34984432-5E383764-C7EA-474F-A3C7-DABE724EEE75

Q34984432-604491EE-E17B-463F-BF8E-88424C809805

Q34984432-84D508ED-49C0-440D-AF2C-5F4269C04780

Q34984432-8902AF0E-9D87-40E7-ABE3-151C464D8F31

Q34984432-8A765BBD-749C-429B-ADD8-56507AFA0592

Q34984432-92D57642-7363-46D8-A0A7-E99679804265

P2860

Q34984432-578B5C26-F94E-4797-A33D-23E406550C12

Q34984432-5937DB3D-742D-4ECB-B6DF-9B8F3CA869E5

P304

Q34984432-1DA2C06F-FB24-45F3-85CE-08023F742249

P31

Q34984432-165D3ED5-1467-42E1-BAFA-865846E79247

P356

Q34984432-382E80D3-040B-4708-87B1-9C4A128F2765

P433

Q34984432-79228147-CFA0-425A-B466-538D2A697771

P478

Q34984432-FBAF0F9C-048C-4306-BDA2-3C82B0263F3E

P50

Q34984432-7CBF00F8-B49B-43D3-9BA7-7FE1385C60FC

Q34984432-E11D33D7-E413-4214-A4CA-ECAEAD06A78F

P577

Q34984432-05ECEA14-FF6B-48F9-9F94-211D4AD4C5D1

P5875

Q34984432-2D2415CB-7678-4C7E-AAEB-D408287BAE73

P698

Q34984432-60972326-867C-42C1-B7E4-240639F93B94

P921

Q34984432-5db43c35-860c-40cd-8a32-673d281efb19

P356

J.1398-9995.2009.02083.X

P1433

P1476

Grading quality of evidence an ...... agnostic tests and strategies.

@en

P2093

A R Horvath

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

B Phillips

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

D M Lang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

E A Akl

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

E Ueffing

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

G H Guyatt

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

GRADE Working Group

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

H J Schünemann

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J Bousquet

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J L Brozek

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions.

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.

P304

1109-1116

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/J.1398-9995.2009.02083.X

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

64

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Joerg J Meerpohl

Paul P. Glasziou

P577

2009-05-29T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

26260479

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

19489757

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921