Surgery with disc prosthesis versus rehabilitation in patients with low back pain and degenerative disc: two year follow-up of randomised study. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Surgery with disc prosthesis versus rehabilitation in patients with low back pain and degenerative disc: two year follow-up of randomised study.

Surgery with disc prosthesis versus rehabilitation in patients with low back pain and degenerative disc: two year follow-up of randomised study.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35002503

about

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults Total disc replacement for chronic back pain in the presence of disc degeneration Generic Preference-based Measures for Low Back Pain: Which of Them Should Be Used?Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of chronic low back pain: A meta-analysis based on current evidence.Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease The Prolo Scale: history, evolution and psychometric properties.Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.Long-term effects of interprofessional biopsychosocial rehabilitation for adults with chronic non-specific low back pain: a multicentre, quasi-experimental study ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.Change in pain, disability and influence of fear-avoidance in a work-focused intervention on neck and back pain: a randomized controlled trial.Interspinous process stabilization with Rocker via unilateral approach versus X-Stop via bilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study.Predictors of outcome after surgery with disc prosthesis and rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: 2-year follow-up Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis.Clinical outcomes after treatment with disc prostheses in three lumbar segments compared to one- or two segments.Fat in the lumbar multifidus muscles - predictive value and change following disc prosthesis surgery and multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: 2-year follow-up of a randomized trial.Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of discogenic low back pain.Factors associated with survey response in hand surgery research.Five-year follow-up of total disc replacement compared to fusion: a randomized controlled trial.Open discectomy vs microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation - a protocol for a pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.Standardizing and monitoring the delivery of surgical interventions in randomized clinical trials.Comparative effectiveness of microdecompression and laminectomy for central lumbar spinal stenosis: study protocol for an observational study The role of stem cell therapies in degenerative lumbar spine disease: a review.Systematic review of intervention design and delivery in pragmatic and explanatory surgical randomized clinical trials.Lumbar disc replacement surgery-successes and obstacles to widespread adoption.Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Interspinous Fastener Provides Comparable Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rate to Pedicle Screws.Microsurgical decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-center observational study.Do more MRI findings imply worse disability or more intense low back pain? A cross-sectional study of candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis.Lumbar total disc replacement: predictors for long-term outcome.Reliability of change in lumbar MRI findings over time in patients with and without disc prosthesis--comparing two different image evaluation methods.Comparison of Lumbar Total Disc Replacement With Surgical Spinal Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Degenerative Disc Disease: A Meta-Analysis of 5-Year Outcomes From Randomized Controlled Trials.We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement DELTA guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial DELTA2 guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial

P2860

Q24193855-6DD7B4DC-7CF1-401E-AA52-0FF937BB5506 Q24197505-0968D02D-D3E6-4465-8CA0-9DD67D7D227C Q24200767-EA2BCB26-BD31-4683-A624-7C39A0C87C61 Q28085341-413EB670-422C-4348-BD79-B1361592EA4B Q34673289-91D6EE9C-CAF4-4449-8F78-DBCA2B63B807 Q34690656-9E3D7FCF-67CB-47D9-918F-1503FF0AA150 Q34713995-55EFB67B-0A78-416A-8D43-4ECCA36FF1FE Q34996360-6EDC922C-3535-464A-BC05-9E5ED828FB11 Q35158187-94C4A477-5233-43A7-97A0-1716F2284139 Q35175687-FF60401B-6EEA-443B-A570-B0C256671764 Q35179473-1FAEB4A7-6D32-47D1-BB83-7552E2C5B395 Q35238572-C008B797-4ACF-4E40-BD0B-ECA4C0FBCB52 Q35540617-C68E1818-CA45-45BD-BF46-5E92D07AC17B Q35828745-824CD3F7-0101-495A-A785-FEE2CDBE0564 Q35888260-4F69FF3B-3381-492C-8D88-E12319BA9ADD Q36055856-C5D03D9C-9AAB-420F-A6D2-481F8490BCDD Q36175585-87CE9CD7-D2C4-498F-8312-C502A2FAB9A3 Q36334596-23E33677-6759-4528-A57E-AA823F96EA35 Q36783054-E3C5DA51-8029-4E6E-A84F-E0DEAF9EC970 Q37170967-9BAAFDAD-CF14-4146-B93E-2E7E18DF49BF Q37245760-AA765320-F7F4-46D0-8C32-7AE58836C33D Q37384239-0BF157E9-6EB9-45EE-85F0-570C9029A522 Q37462265-7FE3CC15-7FFA-4E59-A6FE-3BA9C4FE606F Q37657370-8773E063-125B-45F4-BE9F-43CD6CDC39A7 Q38370139-FC602F65-6430-4F58-84A9-7FEF430952F2 Q38515144-04D28384-5C1F-4E85-9099-3BB624DC3ED6 Q38742144-99F6A5A5-EE56-48C8-9293-A19C641F651A Q38763859-5BFA8386-0B0A-4B16-B9D2-5037A46A510F Q40909397-3B0666C8-3442-4E5F-A9AA-883892ABC294 Q44075932-23C041C8-24B1-4790-A690-817B84764523 Q48365272-81CCDB17-98DC-4FD1-B0C4-3ABBF3DBF2B4 Q51399014-4FCBADDB-2B8C-45C6-93AF-8C23FD245E67 Q55430137-216E4003-60C4-4DDD-9057-644C33007172 Q57135664-CCD012A8-953D-4BEC-B46D-C4687FED258D Q58612542-25C277EB-C6E4-4AEB-9228-DA19EDF34201 Q59133671-F0D048F3-53BD-4232-8FA2-0D3733F23085

P2860

Surgery with disc prosthesis versus rehabilitation in patients with low back pain and degenerative disc: two year follow-up of randomised study.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35002503

description

2011 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2011 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2011 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2011年の論文

@ja

2011年論文

@yue

2011年論文

@zh-hant

2011年論文

@zh-hk

2011年論文

@zh-mo

2011年論文

@zh-tw

2011年论文

@wuu

name

Surgery with disc prosthesis v ...... follow-up of randomised study.

@ast

Surgery with disc prosthesis v ...... follow-up of randomised study.

@en

type

label

Surgery with disc prosthesis v ...... follow-up of randomised study.

@ast

Surgery with disc prosthesis v ...... follow-up of randomised study.

@en

prefLabel

Surgery with disc prosthesis v ...... follow-up of randomised study.

@ast

Surgery with disc prosthesis v ...... follow-up of randomised study.

@en

P1433

Q35002503-623EEACB-9FDA-4320-A2E7-882D4DB088D8

P1476

Q35002503-07D0B1C8-1D7D-4186-9425-7714FF675182

P2093

Q35002503-0CB33A21-82A8-43DC-87EE-5B2E6297830B

Q35002503-16495D81-EDA2-46F5-BC8D-E7F131BB299E

Q35002503-4F004E1B-41F6-4B75-9975-450B3AFAA598

Q35002503-55B7AB81-AE7F-4AAB-B78D-A1627450BADD

Q35002503-7878EF9A-5AB6-418D-9BCC-6F7161F40A96

Q35002503-9D97EF91-EB1E-4D92-92FE-236DA4C50AA0

Q35002503-A13B39A6-1105-4561-A957-C6DBDA4DCBCF

Q35002503-BFA522FC-3BBE-482D-BF81-4BF0E97930EC

Q35002503-CA040ED9-95EB-48E7-BAF2-3D4BA2339DBA

Q35002503-D7CDB416-3690-42B1-986B-A34601C60B0D

P2860

Q35002503-0336546C-0BD7-4560-B596-0F63FEA4DE2A

Q35002503-083A0985-47BA-462F-BA74-C1A08B295737

Q35002503-1907289E-BAA0-4CF0-B2B4-3193E8A7396D

Q35002503-293A5EAC-ED6B-4AF3-A19A-C9B68916BF00

Q35002503-2C498DC5-D467-480C-94A2-589DF0CF82BF

Q35002503-34BB171C-D5A5-437E-B46E-BCB94B75B2D2

Q35002503-37EABA7B-1FCE-48C6-9E5C-F3EB420114AA

Q35002503-3A9D2FC0-5009-42E1-A9A2-D7D01E36A336

Q35002503-3CC3469E-7032-4347-9620-365A8644E9F4

Q35002503-3CD8532E-51B7-49A5-B274-A7BCC9612FB3

P304

Q35002503-156BE75C-5813-4506-9DE0-32A09CE09172

P31

Q35002503-6E2E5204-B8A2-494D-BEBE-CAAB641407B8

P356

Q35002503-87D4C1E5-7D7F-4451-B485-0644417ABBF7

P407

Q35002503-7C091E6A-A65A-4F77-A255-8E8A27BA0F86

P478

Q35002503-E406AD75-C07E-4D4C-9A20-E7632988B578

P577

Q35002503-C915D08E-C4BD-478F-95BF-9DBE764F17C7

P5875

Q35002503-29D90FB2-5409-4342-99EA-D72108375008

P698

Q35002503-F7F93AA6-7192-4238-A84E-55385F26AAE8

P932

Q35002503-24058A51-18B9-4F35-B461-26A8E5A1B398

P356

P1433

P1476

Surgery with disc prosthesis v ...... follow-up of randomised study.

@en

P2093

Christian Hellum

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ivar Rossvoll

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jens Ivar Brox

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kjersti Storheim

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lars Gunnar Johnsen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Leiv Sandvik

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Magne Rø

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Norwegian Spine Study Group

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Oliver Grundnes

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Oystein P Nygaard

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis

Charité total disc replacement--clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years

The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group

Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up

Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications

Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up

A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes

Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients

EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life

P304

d2786

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/BMJ.D2786

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P478

342

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2011-05-19T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

51150589

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

21596740

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3100911

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string