A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening.
about
Utilization of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance among American patients: a systematic reviewFollow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests: considering the multilevel context of careSurveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma.Unifying screening processes within the PROSPR consortium: a conceptual model for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screeningData for cancer comparative effectiveness research: past, present, and future potential.A framework for understanding cancer comparative effectiveness research data needsA review of systematic reviews evaluating diabetes interventions: focus on quality of life and disparities.Developing and sustaining quality improvement partnerships in the VA: the Colorectal Cancer Care Collaborative.The health disparities cancer collaborative: a case study of practice registry measurement in a quality improvement collaborative.Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in mortality among women diagnosed with cervical cancer in New York City, 1995-2006The colorectal cancer screening process in community settings: a conceptual model for the population-based research optimizing screening through personalized regimens consortiumRacial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogramFunctional health literacy in Spanish-speaking Latinas seeking breast cancer screening through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Program.Using computational modeling to assess the impact of clinical decision support on cancer screening improvement strategies within the community health centersRacial, social, and clinical determinants of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillanceElectronic medical records and improving the quality of the screening process.Breast cancer screening in an era of personalized regimens: a conceptual model and National Cancer Institute initiative for risk-based and preference-based approaches at a population level.Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.Performance measurement for people with multiple chronic conditions: conceptual model.Primary care practice organization influences colorectal cancer screening performance.Patient characteristics associated with the level of patient-reported care coordination among male patients with colorectal cancer in the Veterans Affairs health care system.Hepatocellular Carcinoma From Epidemiology to Prevention: Translating Knowledge into Practice.Failure rates in the hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance process.A multilevel research perspective on cancer care delivery: the example of follow-up to an abnormal mammogramToward improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the interfaces of primary and oncology-related subspecialty careThe organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality.Implementation and spread of interventions into the multilevel context of routine practice and policy: implications for the cancer care continuum.Computational modeling and multilevel cancer control interventions.Introduction: Understanding and influencing multilevel factors across the cancer care continuum.Multilevel factors affecting quality: examples from the cancer care continuum.Behavioral theory in the context of applied cancer screening research.Time to follow up after an abnormal finding in organized gastric cancer screening in KoreaImproving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: innovative strategies and future directions.Variation in Screening Abnormality Rates and Follow-Up of Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening within the PROSPR ConsortiumImproving hepatocellular carcinoma screening: applying lessons from colorectal cancer screening.Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patientsBreast cancer mortality in Appalachia: reversing patterns of disparity over time.Psychosocial determinants of intention to screen for Alzheimer's disease.The need for holistic cancer care framework: breast cancer care as an exampleTowards a more comprehensive understanding of cancer burden in North Carolina: priorities for intervention
P2860
Q26852154-19A05F43-4D22-45A1-9D61-6013FDF00DF3Q26861549-9B6B89B4-A543-414D-ADA3-1C993DC87DD2Q27690269-0627879A-F5E5-4F47-8BE6-06B0D3B21D56Q28392615-B642AA66-5B5D-4C9E-839F-0160C4B20F5BQ30416509-B0B1DB3C-C672-4C81-841F-9E39B99B2856Q30416607-876F12A2-8C92-4E78-B932-C1AC918F5566Q33581975-EAD692C9-1EE5-48A8-AEFA-0C414C7F9EEDQ33592629-E1F7D8C9-A264-49C5-AF4D-5C95BB218A90Q33969111-28259B3C-4B3B-4348-9632-29FA85775C3EQ33990351-DC454666-AB86-4441-9565-D875B71E1AF4Q34106363-30136AE3-FB30-4CD6-B6BB-AF232BBA8F53Q34141799-2C8C00FE-70C0-478B-B2DB-81F85FC83F79Q34271963-9BC77F65-35E7-4CA2-8F36-C41657529491Q34325166-41FDC859-AF2A-4723-AE4B-16710748925AQ34808945-8A4543D3-4C4C-4125-9387-8F7131A31ADDQ35111954-0AE038D3-4875-4F17-A481-A3BA5F9AA46DQ35125812-93E59C71-9DB9-4E08-9F12-459C4E27FB0FQ35126323-34B44917-964E-45C3-B900-42D063849FBAQ35695207-DBF80F19-103C-45B7-9E6E-82F3403AE3DAQ35954924-A0A173B6-81A4-442A-B042-0E2ACF3AC844Q36070081-E6190AD3-1218-4274-B58A-2A3C78B98972Q36199751-9E057DBF-11F7-4B84-BEED-995483A3C548Q36213610-225EE4F0-C318-4ED9-86EE-774BACCB41B5Q36306247-1F317A13-6FC6-4DCA-AB61-881B09A33B26Q36352783-617CD66B-CBAE-4816-A1FB-F577F9FD9665Q36352794-D44B3C31-DAB9-483D-9347-706BFA0F56B6Q36352824-09340461-09E3-418F-9D32-59BF0BA893A4Q36352839-219EF98A-BC83-46E5-8051-31125948A2E9Q36352867-6AAF519F-256E-41AA-B08C-324D5264DEEAQ36352891-92F361EF-411B-411F-A6DB-3A8576DEA9CEQ36352941-C5569139-7F94-41CC-B9C3-C6C33F696BA8Q36453828-8B0FCFCC-711B-46EA-900C-B1CECF96E094Q36551996-9793121B-93DE-4A5A-ADD5-442D2D88000CQ36717601-6021409A-4F94-436A-B391-624913690587Q36724362-B135B702-1B6C-4875-B5B1-FDAE7E13CE4CQ36834162-3488F40B-50B3-4CF5-A833-D8FFF966F2D8Q36893152-8BC415ED-12A1-4DC0-959C-9FA9E51E52E5Q37026487-119C4EE8-86EC-411D-9A01-6FC81A2B00FFQ37160516-D09D1EC5-547F-4316-AA2F-E0FE6C2E6914Q37346817-987CC9C2-668D-4083-93D9-9077D78E6100
P2860
A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2003 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
name
A framework for improving the ...... and cervical cancer screening.
@ast
A framework for improving the ...... and cervical cancer screening.
@en
type
label
A framework for improving the ...... and cervical cancer screening.
@ast
A framework for improving the ...... and cervical cancer screening.
@en
prefLabel
A framework for improving the ...... and cervical cancer screening.
@ast
A framework for improving the ...... and cervical cancer screening.
@en
P2093
P1476
A framework for improving the ...... and cervical cancer screening
@en
P2093
Jane G Zapka
Leif I Solberg
M Michele Manos
Stephen H Taplin
P577
2003-01-01T00:00:00Z