The nonuse of psychological research at two federal agencies.
about
Do author-suggested reviewers rate submissions more favorably than editor-suggested reviewers? A study on atmospheric chemistry and physicsPeer review, program officers and science fundingIs it time for studying real-life debiasing? Evaluation of the effectiveness of an analogical intervention technique.An examination of sources of peer-review bias.Psychological research and the prostate-cancer screening controversy.Offering chemotherapy and hospice jointly: one solution to hospice underuse.
P2860
The nonuse of psychological research at two federal agencies.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2003 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
name
The nonuse of psychological research at two federal agencies.
@ast
The nonuse of psychological research at two federal agencies.
@en
type
label
The nonuse of psychological research at two federal agencies.
@ast
The nonuse of psychological research at two federal agencies.
@en
prefLabel
The nonuse of psychological research at two federal agencies.
@ast
The nonuse of psychological research at two federal agencies.
@en
P2860
P356
P1476
The nonuse of psychological research at two federal agencies.
@en
P2093
Hal R Arkes
P2860
P356
10.1111/1467-9280.01410
P577
2003-01-01T00:00:00Z