What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?
about
Relationship Between the Lateral Center-Edge Angle and 3-Dimensional Acetabular Coverage.Evaluation of Constant Thickness Cartilage Models vs. Patient Specific Cartilage Models for an Optimized Computer-Assisted Planning of Periacetabular Osteotomy.An increased iliocapsularis-to-rectus-femoris ratio is suggestive for instability in borderline hipsMultiplanar evaluation of radiological findings associated with acetabular dysplasia and investigation of its prevalence in an Asian population: a CT-based studyMeasures of hip morphology are related to development of worsening radiographic hip osteoarthritis over 6 to 13 year follow-up: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis ProjectRadiographic Prevalence of Dysplasia, Cam, and Pincer Deformities in Elite Ballet.Periacetabular Osteotomy Provides Higher Survivorship Than Rim Trimming for Acetabular Retroversion.The John Charnley Award: Redefining the Natural History of Osteoarthritis in Patients With Hip Dysplasia and Impingement.Acetabular Wall Indices Help to Distinguish Acetabular Coverage in Asymptomatic Adults With Varying Morphologies.What MRI Findings Predict Failure 10 Years After Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?Three Patterns of Acetabular Deficiency Are Common in Young Adult Patients With Acetabular Dysplasia.Comparison of rotational acetabular osteotomy performed with navigation by surgeons with different levels of experience of osteotomies.Is Increased Acetabular Cartilage or Fossa Size Associated With Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement?Preoperative Outcome Scores Are Predictive of Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement.Comment on Mittal et al: Defining the lateral edge of the femoroacetabular articulation: correlation analysis between radiographs and computed tomography.Hips With Protrusio Acetabuli Are at Increased Risk for Failure After Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A 10-year Followup.INFLUENCE OF AGE ON PARAMETERS FOR FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT AND HIP DYSPLASIA IN X-RAYSFemale Sex Is a Risk Factor for Failure of Hip Arthroscopy Performed for Acetabular Retroversion.Prevalence of Femoral and Acetabular Version Abnormalities in Patients With Symptomatic Hip Disease: A Controlled Study of 538 Hips.What Are the Risk Factors for Revision Surgery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at 7-year Followup?Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects.Preoperative planning for redirective, periacetabular osteotomies.Outcomes of intra-articular corticosteroid injections for adolescents with hip pain.One-third of Hips After Periacetabular Osteotomy Survive 30 Years With Good Clinical Results, No Progression of Arthritis, or Conversion to THA.Labral Reattachment in Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery Results in Increased 10-year Survivorship Compared With Resection.Complete Circumferential Osseous Extension in the Acetabular Rim Occurs Regardless of Acetabular Coverage.[Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. : Indications, technique and results 30 years after the first description].CORR Insights®: Acetabular Wall Indices Help to Distinguish Acetabular Coverage in Asymptomatic Adults with Varying Morphologies.Imaging of femoroacetabular impingement-current concepts.
P2860
Q33590207-B9B07E2C-E68D-41BD-B2CE-7749B8154A10Q35885313-683BAD1A-FB31-4FD4-8DA5-96FCE52DD5A7Q36226284-03AEE773-2E25-4946-89A3-A72C70C576AFQ36264132-E6109233-337A-4105-B1CE-761D26339414Q36600157-939CC16D-CDA9-4BF9-A972-A03783EB9FA6Q38577725-001B0900-02B0-49A6-A681-38D5E0D0D641Q38786742-63D46133-3D3F-4608-B535-3F520B7AF968Q38806387-A23A0668-7F5B-4A71-85B3-DB75ADE33DD8Q38823871-E859560D-6FB4-485F-825C-85E00FB2DA16Q38825856-C5086988-16F8-4F3D-91C4-545DABEF4B20Q39004233-C170F04A-FE24-4147-AE47-BDBE279879D7Q39248114-E0A5A455-8927-4CCA-8008-7D560B3F07CCQ39380733-5723F95B-303A-4926-98FD-46849C6295DFQ40527344-960E2469-63D6-4FC6-8632-13682984371CQ41298675-CFBA48A7-779E-4DAF-9FA8-72C6326FFC90Q41637911-167347F6-6FE8-4235-BC0E-D2B7FD9503F0Q42732637-BD6B81E3-53F1-4DCC-93E2-22A6DC15872AQ44070615-56FB6DB8-0BFD-4C79-8C45-2463855120ECQ47631170-E94E4EF2-3B44-4D60-8B9A-25D4D057FB3EQ48314185-1AE6F10D-4F80-4F94-986A-E81765E002FDQ49048603-3580DA74-3B18-47A2-BF4A-126CC24618CCQ49709253-12B0BFBD-D0E5-4CD7-8A11-16F369AD2778Q50052398-6C43EDE1-FAD7-4D66-8536-08A6649FBEFEQ51034616-7FFC8027-99B4-42A7-8A0F-188841DEAD70Q51770947-71905EA5-6874-41B0-8B94-CAD4DF55657AQ52868487-F0CA5D03-7087-44EF-A91E-E9B333542271Q54412865-DA032C71-FC0B-411A-B687-3C071283C165Q54839698-E787D7B0-E80C-49D1-966B-9A43BC14156BQ55394404-D0C81491-7E6D-43A4-B0AD-E9C10E379AAD
P2860
What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2015 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
name
What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?
@ast
What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?
@en
type
label
What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?
@ast
What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?
@en
prefLabel
What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?
@ast
What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?
@en
P2093
Klaus A Siebenrock
Markus S Hanke
Moritz Tannast
Simon D Steppacher
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S11999-014-4038-3
P407
P50
P577
2015-04-01T00:00:00Z