Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.
about
Infection Prevention and Evaluation of Fever After Laparoscopic HysterectomyPelvic surgical site infections in gynecologic surgeryIntracorporeal electromechanical tissue morcellation: a critical review and recommendations for clinical practiceAn economic analysis of robotically assisted hysterectomy.Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy.Minimally invasive specialists and rates of laparoscopic hysterectomyRobotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.Complication reports for robotic surgery using three arms by a single surgeon at a single institution.A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of the Use of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopy in Surgery Compared with Open or Laparoscopic Surgery.Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy.The future of robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery in Australia - A time and a place for everything.Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy.30 Years of Robotic Surgery.Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.Risk of Occult Uterine Sarcoma in Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.Corneal abrasion in hysterectomy and prostatectomy: role of laparoscopic and robotic assistance.Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: Which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery?Premature Judgment of Uterine Morcellation: Look at the Data Before You Leap.Movement to outpatient hysterectomy for benign indications in the United States, 2008-2014.Arm reduced robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with transvaginal cuff closure.Outcomes in women undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy at a tertiary hospital in Western Australia.Risk, risk reduction and management of occult malignancy diagnosed after uterine morcellation: a commentary.Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center.Health care cost consequences of using robot technology for hysterectomy: a register-based study of consecutive patients during 2006-2013.Trends in Route of Hysterectomy after the Implementation of a Comprehensive Robotic Training ProgramUse of Paracervical Block Before Laparoscopic Supracervical HysterectomyA systematic review about costing methodology in robotic surgery: evidence for low quality in most of the studies
P2860
Q26782707-D0096808-1EB5-42E8-BC06-2037549312FFQ26826947-7DA0ED6F-46C3-485D-B322-070CA902F9EFQ26858930-249E7003-80E8-4D25-9501-7091AA26DB95Q34089701-4E29F903-530A-4183-B79B-C638B0E4A4C4Q34625098-F802ED48-ED4C-48A2-8635-D4DAF27F5CB1Q35223320-4117A88E-CEDC-46FD-BA5B-9F863030C4F2Q35739210-DB7BE5C8-C5DC-458F-96AB-9A0EB3F7EF20Q35948624-87602CD5-82B1-4972-A947-F4A89F71948BQ36914426-A490EF2B-7059-4722-BF09-ABA99109DC4CQ37550782-8E2A6EC7-BCB7-4C59-AE1E-A4EEB262379AQ38560210-8DBDD56E-84DA-4FE3-A487-015CA901998FQ38623831-EEE0A48A-4AF5-4048-8375-ACF0E5DBE6C4Q38635195-829346BF-A6B2-4F9B-A2BE-A7C15CBCAA20Q38635646-D37799C2-358F-4EE2-B7AC-60D3250D0431Q38867460-45438D86-A06C-49AC-97CE-EE49FF1BF108Q39655693-A9762F6B-8BE4-42D5-B4BE-1C643EEADF2BQ40015102-4259B1EE-36DE-48CC-AA79-0CA6BA561C69Q41311688-BA694416-6F1F-4D04-BB9F-1D64B3215CFCQ42698838-C36BE34D-141E-49F8-8EE4-69CA590A1AD7Q45146630-0441D991-A493-435D-9023-5FF3E4DEFD1BQ46216988-E0680296-7E08-41B1-877B-EE80FDD9BF87Q47096946-1BBDF08F-43AE-4C51-A125-585960367EC3Q47424377-A0D59418-F86C-4AD1-B8B9-7DA85F3AEA28Q52894849-4DF3D9FB-4103-4C6E-B659-3B708BE2C107Q53053783-FB2607BB-9EC2-4BC5-9DEF-1432B37727B6Q54142958-01ED707F-A705-4603-9699-DE53200DDF15Q57493313-B65E11BD-438E-4121-A6B6-617BBD67212CQ57825095-FCCD0555-E3AF-4B90-BF24-E49089CDF597Q58759522-AA8980AC-A837-44CA-A4F7-FBAB69FC09D7
P2860
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2013 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
name
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.
@ast
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.
@en
type
label
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.
@ast
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.
@ast
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.
@en
P2093
Eric B Rosero
Girish P Joshi
Joseph I Schaffer
Kimberly A Kho
Martin Giesecke
P2860
P304
P356
10.1097/AOG.0B013E3182A4EE4D
P407
P577
2013-10-01T00:00:00Z