Comparison of fecal and cecal microbiotas reveals qualitative similarities but quantitative differences.
about
Blurred Lines: Pathogens, Commensals, and the Healthy GutPrebiotics and gut microbiota in chickensDoes adaptive radiation of a host lineage promote ecological diversity of its bacterial communities? A test using gut microbiota of Anolis lizards.The gastrointestinal tract microbiota of the Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica.High-throughput sequencing technology to reveal the composition and function of cecal microbiota in Dagu chicken.Gut metagenomic analysis reveals prominent roles of Lactobacillus and cecal microbiota in chicken feed efficiency.Temporal Relationships Exist Between Cecum, Ileum, and Litter Bacterial Microbiomes in a Commercial Turkey Flock, and Subtherapeutic Penicillin Treatment Impacts Ileum Bacterial Community Establishment.Bacteria within the Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiota Correlated with Improved Growth and Feed Conversion: Challenges Presented for the Identification of Performance Enhancing Probiotic Bacteria.An investigation into blood microbiota and its potential association with Bacterial Chondronecrosis with Osteomyelitis (BCO) in Broilers.Differential fecal microbiota are retained in broiler chicken lines divergently selected for fatness traits.The Bacteriomes of Ileal Mucosa and Cecal Content of Broiler Chickens and Turkeys as Revealed by Metagenomic Analysis.Effects of Eimeria tenella infection on chicken caecal microbiome diversity, exploring variation associated with severity of pathology.Comparative characterization of bacterial communities in geese fed all-grass or high-grain diets.Inheritance and Establishment of Gut Microbiota in Chickens.Measuring the gut microbiome in birds: comparison of faecal and cloacal sampling.Assessing the microbiomes of scalder and chiller tank waters throughout a typical commercial poultry processing day.Fecal Microbiota Transplant from Highly Feed-Efficient Donors Shows Little Effect on Age-Related Changes in Feed-Efficiency-Associated Fecal Microbiota from Chickens.Selenium nanoparticles in poultry feed modify gut microbiota and increase abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii.Host and Environmental Factors Affecting the Intestinal Microbiota in Chickens.At-hatch administration of probiotic to chickens can introduce beneficial changes in gut microbiota.Tannins and Bacitracin Differentially Modulate Gut Microbiota of Broiler Chickens.Astragalus affects fecal microbial composition of young hens as determined by 16S rRNA sequencing.Biomarkers for monitoring intestinal health in poultry: present status and future perspectives.Comparison of gizzard and intestinal microbiota of wild neotropical birds.Differences in gut microbiota composition in finishing Landrace pigs with low and high feed conversion ratiosComparative Analyses of the Digestive Tract Microbiota of New Guinean Passerine BirdsIntestinal toxicity of deoxynivalenol is limited by supplementation with JM113 and consequentially altered gut microbiota in broiler chickens
P2860
Q26776078-9872B47F-ABA6-498E-9B94-52FF4E86C41DQ26799785-0368D6EF-E704-4CD8-8B1D-FD1E29C59C40Q30276178-74C637AA-5F0D-4372-BA59-B211C8E7FDFBQ35892000-E9AB6820-BCC2-45E7-9E65-58ED9235D365Q36183100-B75ED7D4-C419-43F2-A7AE-D5D5E08AB1BEQ36325098-9E779BDA-04FC-4D8C-B822-3996D04FBF71Q36353391-C7F7A1D7-90F9-4736-96CD-CF15A941ABB2Q36596802-19390BB6-688E-45BA-963B-32BF58F0E514Q36897965-AE6D41CC-F176-420D-A457-E42686AAAC25Q37430905-020A40B9-C74A-4284-919B-298B8BA18430Q37578590-B3181745-50AF-44C4-AB3C-9AC49135CF10Q42269661-A813FA69-D4CD-4514-85AB-0F5112D1B1D3Q42369573-F19E9C06-2B68-4583-94A4-951AF6A268F5Q42700502-9AAA6C32-5E1B-417E-B43B-F1A4118299AFQ46247905-31743E8F-ED60-4C5D-BC58-80B44A096E65Q46513053-FE6D8EFC-2136-40F8-91A5-796D07766E10Q47590596-2D55DC7B-58ED-4A6C-A917-87F94763640EQ47776924-484773DB-6771-4BC5-A6B2-A1AC296E9A9BQ50351530-7E567770-5120-4B00-9748-5613D69A60BFQ52640430-F39E32ED-37CC-4099-8249-6B3C11BD8698Q53692770-75106523-EBA0-4781-98BA-055ADBA16047Q53827329-BD8A8C1B-3150-4428-BB9E-B1FCAEF30AD9Q54942199-12AEFD5A-231E-44B8-8029-5352A3753373Q55192297-DA27F98C-94D1-4BD8-B05D-12A908BD8CCFQ57098720-8FD42075-C202-4988-B68F-9D1EA4E67C68Q57688676-42862DBE-F87E-48ED-959B-393D91B99999Q58580590-B2042D99-D20F-4FED-85A1-3738C6838E5D
P2860
Comparison of fecal and cecal microbiotas reveals qualitative similarities but quantitative differences.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2015 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
name
Comparison of fecal and cecal ...... but quantitative differences.
@ast
Comparison of fecal and cecal ...... but quantitative differences.
@en
type
label
Comparison of fecal and cecal ...... but quantitative differences.
@ast
Comparison of fecal and cecal ...... but quantitative differences.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of fecal and cecal ...... but quantitative differences.
@ast
Comparison of fecal and cecal ...... but quantitative differences.
@en
P2860
P50
P1433
P1476
Comparison of fecal and cecal ...... but quantitative differences.
@en
P2093
Honglei Chen
Robert J Hughes
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/S12866-015-0388-6
P577
2015-02-27T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1051061233