Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

about

Cost-effectiveness of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus observation in older patients presenting with mild biliary disease.Predictors of improvement in health-related quality of life in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

P2860

Q34076083-8CF8D5DA-D090-44DD-A354-3A83E00AE6E2 Q47348491-700B40CE-58CA-4660-B180-5179E52A1309

P2860

Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35561839

description

2002 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2002年の論文

@ja

2002年論文

@yue

2002年論文

@zh-hant

2002年論文

@zh-hk

2002年論文

@zh-mo

2002年論文

@zh-tw

2002年论文

@wuu

2002年论文

@zh

2002年论文

@zh-cn

name

Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

@ast

Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

@en

type

Item

label

Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

@ast

Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

@en

prefLabel

Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

@ast

Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

@en

P1476

Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy

@en

P2093

A Bilbao

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

B Barrios

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

I López de Tejada

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

I Aróstegui

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J Cabriada

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

M Varona

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

V Oribe

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Fortnightly review: gallbladder disease.

Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: a comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel.

Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway.

Appropriateness of cholecystectomy in the United Kingdom--a consensus panel approach.

Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Scotland.

Indications for coronary revascularisation: a Dutch perspective.

How representative are members of expert panels?

When does consensus exist in expert panels?

The appropriateness of performing coronary artery bypass surgery.

The paradox of appropriate care.

P304

320-326

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/QHC.11.4.320

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

José M Quintana

P577

2002-12-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

11002385

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

12468691

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

cholecystectomy

P932

1757992

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

about

P2860

P2860

Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P698

P921

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P698

P921

P932