Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal.
about
Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studiesEditorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?A quantitative ranking of Canada's research output of original human studies for the decade 1989 to 1998.Predictive validity evidence for medical education research study quality instrument scores: quality of submissions to JGIM's Medical Education Special Issue.A peek behind the curtain: peer review and editorial decision making at Stroke.Information for peer reviewers.
P2860
Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal.
description
1992 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1992年の論文
@ja
1992年論文
@yue
1992年論文
@zh-hant
1992年論文
@zh-hk
1992年論文
@zh-mo
1992年論文
@zh-tw
1992年论文
@wuu
1992年论文
@zh
1992年论文
@zh-cn
name
Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal.
@ast
Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal.
@en
type
label
Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal.
@ast
Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal.
@en
prefLabel
Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal.
@ast
Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal.
@en
P1433
P1476
Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1097/00001888-199212000-00013
P407
P577
1992-12-01T00:00:00Z